Unmatched Innings: Dilip Kumar Looks Back (THE HINDU)

LINK
Uttam Kumar was watching a trial show of “Sagina Mahato” in 16mm print at NT1 Studio, Kolkata in July, 1972. Later he told director Tapan Sinha, “Tapan da, thank God you did not cast me as Sagina. It would have been a blunder as I could not have matched Yusufda who has brought Sagina alive on screen.”

This is one of the stories in thespian Dilip Kumar’s fourth biography, written by his wife Saira Banu. This comprehensive biography of one of India’s greatest actors has initiated a lot of curiosity since it was announced five years ago.

Films like “Andaz”, “Jogan”, “Daag”, “Foot Path”, “Devdas” and “Ganga Jumna” stand testimony to his versatility. Even today viewers remember his ro Nina ro in “Andaz”, as he shows Nargis the photo of her late father and helps her get over the shock of his death.

Dilip Kumar is in a relaxed and happy mood, a summer evening at his legendary Pali Hill residence.

He sips a cup of black tea and gears up for an interview about his biography and glorious career spanning around seven decades in films.

Tell us more about your biography.

It will not be repetitive. I do not believe in or allow repetitions. My earlier biographies were by Vinita Lamba, Sanjit Nawrekar and Lord Meghnad Desai.

Saira Banu who knows me the best has written exhaustively about my childhood at Peshawar, education, family fruit business, the pains of Partition and my career at length with special mention about my Bengali films, Pari and Sagina Mahato.

It also does not hide my famous romances (laughs). I am confident it will be of interest for readers and my admirers for whom the book is really meant.

Satyajit Ray described you as the ultimate method actor…

Did he? I consider it a great compliment from India’s most acclaimed director. We shared a warm rapport and I feel bad I could not work under his direction. Had I, perhaps my greatest performance would have been extracted by him.

My tragic performances required method acting as there was a matter of meter and chord for each shade in my performance. But when I shifted to light-hearted, comic characters in “Aan”, “Azad”, “Kohinoor”, “Leader” and “Ram Aur Shyam” I tried my best to transcend method as it has its limits.

I learnt to play the sitar for one and a half years before the Madhuban mein Radhika nache re sequence in “Kohinoor”. It had to be spontaneous yet real. Similarly, when Salil Chowdhury requested me to lower my voice by three notes to sing Lagi nahin chute Ram in “Musafir”, I did not opt for any method.

How did you succeed in Bengali films?

I wanted to learn Bengali and deliver my dialogues with conviction after being influenced by talented directors like Amiya Chakrabarty, Nitin Bose, Bimal Ray and Hrishikesh Mukherjee. Script writer Nabendu da, who penned “Devdas” and “Yahudi”, was also instrumental in my learning Bengali.
The other director from Bengal with whom I felt satisfied as an actor was Tapan Sinha. For the sequence in “Sagina Mahato” where I plead innocence in the people’s court, I dubbed 19 times. I was so inspired by the scene and felt I was not able to modulate my voice properly. Tapan finally said, “Yusuf, enough” and used my 18th take during the dubbing.

Tell us about your relationship with Raj Kapoor and Dev Anand?

If I am a legend, so are they. We shared a mutual set of unspoken ethics, had a deep silent regard for each other’s works and never believed in cut-throat competition.

Whatever we achieved was due to merit and not publicity gimmicks. Raj with his plastic face was unforgettable in “Gopinath”, “Jaagte Raho” and “Teesri Kasam”. Dev, the most handsome actor I have seen on the Indian screen, was peerless in “Kala Pani” and “Guide”.

Your memories of Suchitra Sen and other co-stars?

My memories of working with Suchitra Sen in “Devdas” are as fresh as ever. Her beautiful eyes responded like live electric wires in certain shots and only Devika Rani earlier had that kind of dignity.

My other co-stars were also highly gifted: Meena Kumari was seeped with emotion, Nargis was truly versatile, Nimmi still unmatched in intensity, and Vyjayantimala and Waheeda Rehman were highly talented performers as well as dancers.

Your favourite actors and directors?

From Hollywood, with deep respect, I would like to mention Sir Charles Laughton, Paul Muni, Marlon Brando and Richard Burton. Greta Garbo, Ingrid Bergman and Katherine Hepburn are my all-time favourites.

From India, I consider Ashok Kumar, Motilal, Balraj Sahni, Chabi Biswas and Pahari Sanyal as icons of natural performances. Uttam Kumar and Shivaji Ganesan were very powerful actors and I must mention the polished performances of Sabitri Chatterjee and Arundhati Sinha. From the past four decades, Amitabh Bachhan, Aamir Khan and Tabu are gifted performers. Among the directors, Amiya Chakrabarty, Nitin Bose, Bimal Ray, Zia Sarhadi and K. Asif and Mehboob Khan were unforgettable.

Your hand gestures along with dialogues ushered in a revolution…

I used my hands only to justify certain dialogues, which had intensity and meaning. It was spontaneous, not a conscious effort. If I used my arm with every dialogue, it would have seemed phoney and contrived. In films like “Jogan”, “Babul”, “Footpath” and “Devdas”, I avoided unnecessary use of my hands.

Lastly, did you ever feel nervous while performing romantic scenes?

(Smiles) Yes, I did. In the initial years, I felt awkward especially when I found the scenes were peculiar and meaningless. A romantic scene without reality does not impress me.

To perform my romantic scenes I relied on my eyes and then my dialogue delivery. Depth and reality came into romantic scenes from the 1950s onwards.

68 Responses to “Unmatched Innings: Dilip Kumar Looks Back (THE HINDU)”

  1. >>From the past four decades, Amitabh Bachhan, Aamir Khan and Tabu are gifted performers.

    Dilip Saheb, Oldgold is coming…. be ready for the treat… how dare u take Aamir name??

    • As an Aamir fan, I will readily admit Aamir isn’t ‘gifted’ — at least not as an actor. His gift lies in creating a brand of cinema, which is unique in the sense that it invites and/or provokes debate(s) at the same time satisfying the basic minimum entertainment criteria that brings in people by the droves. His ‘script’ sense is more like the ‘sixth’ sense, literally.

      Having said that, he isn’t a slouch as an actor either. But to call him ‘gifted’ as an actor, is stretching it too far, IMO.

    • Glad to see Tabu get a shout — it’s such a shame that “To Baat Pakki” is the only sort of film she seems to be offered these days. She isn’t the most versatile actress, but she has tremendous, under-stated, presence.

      That being said, to mention Tabu as the only female “gifted performer” from the last four decades is pretty outrageous: Smita Patil, anyone?

      • Yeah, and much as I enjoy him, Aamir Khan is not someone who would make this short a shortlist of actors from the past four decades of Indian film!

        Nice to see a mention for Sivaji Ganeshan. I’m not a big fan, but at least Dilip Kumar gave a shout to someone southside.

        • Absolutely. In fact, it is very striking (and somewhat un-generous) to omit the likes of Om Puri, Naseer, Sanjeev Kumar, etc.

          • agree smita patil, snajeev kumar, naseer and om puri ..all are nautral performers and way above aamir at least.. i rate sanjeev very high and tabu is brilliant…

            May be he is not exposed to too many films of them to form an conclusive opinion or is’t a intentional slip??

            In some intv he was aked films he regrets of not doing, He only mentioned 3 movies and one of them was Pyaasa.

          • Iamthat, ultimately I wouldn’t pick apart the answers here too intensely. I’m sure he just rattled off a couple names…

      • ideaunique Says:

        “it’s such a shame that “To Baat Pakki” is the only sort of film she seems to be offered these days.” not true Q – i read in an interview where she told that she has been flooded with scripts but doesn’t feel like doing any of them now…..very choosy and moody she is….good to know DK mentioning AB, AK and Tabu…

        • If so, then Tabu needs to have her head examined for turning down all sorts of scripts but accepting “To Baat Pakki”…

          • lol

          • alex adams Says:

            the likes of tabu need a man in their life …..lol…sorry for being so politically incorrect…and i dont think she is being offered so many millions of roles..
            but yes, her choices seem a bit surprising—she does not seem to be v serious about her career rite now…

          • I will pass over the sexism in that comment, IF you mean that the man Tabu needs is me.

  2. alex adams Says:

    The one thing that strikes me most about this man is dignity and grace.
    The interesting thing is that (if i am correct) he has done only 50-odd filmz in his entire career….

  3. alex adams Says:

    something totally unrelated —
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/cricket/top-stories/Pakistan-board-officials-slaves-to-betting-mafia/articleshow/6464875.cms

    reminds me of the phrase–”dal mein kaala ya kaale mein daal”

  4. alex adams Says:

    he seems to be his usual sensible, thoughtful self in this interview..maybe it is an older interview?
    Lately he has appeared to be deeply afflicted with alzhemiers dementia (to name one)
    I have seen dilip kumar profusely praising SRK esp after his devdas performance (much to my surprise).
    he sad that when looks at an srk film, srk is the only thing one ends up watching…
    Reassuring to NOT find srks name in his shortlist of gr8 actors…
    aamir—is a v good actor , but to me, he is peerless in his film-making acumen and grip of the medium, but maybe is not one of the best all-time actors as such…

  5. myselfaamir Says:

    it really pains me to no end when people underestimate Aamir’s acting capabilities and his achievements. He has essayed variety of roles with elan and is as good as anybody in these roles and characters. What does this term “Natural” mean?????? this term itself is very subjective which can not be the unanimous choice for all, As Aamir has played almost all kind of roles with aplomb without falling short of the requirement of these characters.

  6. If he’s beginning to suffer from Alzheimer then perhaps he can only remember 3i from recent times which he has seen and therefore came up with Amir’s name.

    @IAMTHAT
    >Dilip Saheb, Oldgold is coming…. be ready for the treat… how dare u take Aamir name??

    I respect and admire Dilip Kumar so much that I will take his remark in my stride and not get overwhelmed ;-) for I don’t think Amir is a gifted actor at all (his mostly student act is *groan*), even in films of his which I have liked (not because of him, but in spite of him). SRK has proved to be a far better actor (MNIK, CDI, Swades etc).

  7. Aamir has not always played student Oldgold. If you consider CDI, Swades and MNIK, then you should not forget Raakh, AAA, Sarfarosh, Earth, Rangeela, Akele Hum Akele Tum, TZP and Lagaan.

    If you care to objectively compare both SRK and Aamir’s filmography you’ll find Aamir has played student roles far less number of times than SRK’s played his usual lover boy roles.

    Finally, Aamir Khan is an accomplished performer. It is unfair to only praise his acumen in selecting the ”right scripts” and marketing the film right. He’s actually a good actor and has performed various kinds of roles really well.

    I don’t know whether he can be included in the league of actors like Sanjeev Kumar, Om Puri, Naseeruddin Shah etc., but among his contemporaries in Bollywood, he’s certainly the best.

    There is a certain bias against Aamir. And it’s permanent. Earlier, when his films were not able to get the kind of success and attention they deserved, he was dismissed as a talented performer who couldn’t get his due. Now that his films are getting success, he’s been limited to merely a marketing guy. Be it the media or any other section, no one is ready to fully acknowledge his success and accomplishments. Initially, they even said that the reports about record collections of Ghajini and 3 Idiots were fake and pumped up!

    Anyway, why has an article on Dilip Kumar led to a debate on Aamir’s acting capabilities? He’s said many other things apart from that one line, in his interview! Looks like people are going to go even after Dilip Kumar for committing the sin of naming Aamir (that too, along with Lord Amitabh Bachchan) as a gifted performer.

    Though many here disagree with Dilip Kumar’s choice, but I have noticed in almost every yesteryear actor’s interview (be it Dilip Kumar, Waheeda Rehman or Manoj Kumar, Vinod Khanna) that they do name Aamir Khan whenever they’re asked to name the best actors in contemporary times. Even Om Puri had praised Aamir Khan and said he felt Aamir Khan had the same fire (in present day acting) as himself and Naseer (in his interview to Filmfare).

    [Can post links of interview of each yesteryear actor as a proof in case someone wants it.]

    Even the general public thinks of Aamir highly as an actor. That is reflected in results of surveys like Outlook poll – in which he was voted the second all-time most accomplished actor of Bollywood after Amitabh Bachchan and the Zee News best of of India poll in 2003, in which he was voted the second greatest actor of India after Amitabh Bachchan.

    Though I don’t believe in such polls or surveys, but I mentioned it just to emphasize that even the public thinks he’s among the best when it comes to acting.

    Finally, there is no use arguing or making a case for a person who no one wants to acknowledge. Even his marketing skills were termed as a fluke and certain people said that it was just a stroke of luck or a mere anomaly that his ”so-called marketing skills” had worked. People can barely tolerate any kind of praise for Aamir – be it his acting or his marketing skills.

    Some of you praise him for his knack of selecting the right script. There are many who even term that as a fluke and say that it was merely by chance that these ”rejects of other actors” (Lagaan, DCH, RDB, 3 Idiots), fell into his lap and ended up working! No one was ready to do these films, so they fell in his lap! Ha!

    It’s totally futile to argue for Aamir, because people have termed almost everything he does, as mere fluke or result of chance factors!

    The Oscar nomination of Lagaan is a fluke – the jury was wrong in selecting an undeserving film like Lagaan for the nomination. Indian audience is stupid for liking TZP or 3 Idiots or being influenced by RDB. All his 90s films are flops, no wait a minute…every film before 2008-2009 is a flop or average. Dilip Kumar is wrong in calling him a gifted actor. Anyone who reacts positively towards Aamir or his films is wrong in some way!

    He may not be as great as Amitabh Bachchan or legendary actors down South. Maybe all other contemporary actors are superior to him in various ways. But he’s not that bad either – so as to routinely dismiss his every accomplishment in such a manner…

    • But who dismisses Aamir in this way? Maybe I’ve been hanging out in the wrong (virtual) neighborhoods, but from the time I became aware of him (due to the Lagaan buzz) and started looking him up, almost invariably and consistently he was described as the best actor of the present generation, with a flair for picking the unique or different film, a method actor, an intellectual, etc. Though I didn’t think his early films lived up to these descriptions, that is still the description I remember. And certainly today he seems to be untouchable in the media’s eyes as being a cinematic genius. Again I may not fully agree, but that seems to be the uniform image. So even if there are a few detractors here and there, I don’t think you need to be worried that Aamir is being un- or underappreciated.

      • >>that Aamir is being un- or underappreciated..
        sm, its not that but its like when ppl here and media around want to sing (un)- Glories of some other actor they use aamir for that… just like if somone is asked to make a line shorter, either one can draw a line bigger than original line, which it shud be or cut the size of original line… most ppl and oldgold follow that latter logic and reason

        • You know, if I can live with people dragging in Salman’s name every time they want to talk about a “non-actor”, I think the Aamir fans should be able to live with a few unflattering comparisons involving Aamir. After all, the plaudits for Aamir are much more numerous and widespread. The few dissenting voices can be thought of as spicing up the otherwise boring blandness of universal adulation. :)

      • @sm

        The dismissive comments against Aamir are everywhere. They are here on this blog as well. Run a search on Twitter on Aamir, and you’ll see 50% of comments routinely trashing him for no good reason. Be it fans of SRK or Akshay Kumar – everyone keeps dragging Aamir Khan in every discussion and then trashes him! Fans of Southern stars and their films and fans of yesteryear actors and films – all feel a compulsive need to bring up his name (even if it has got nothing to do with the discussion!) and then keep writing against him. There are certain journalists and critics who make it a point to especially write and spread negative views on Aamir and his films in their blogs and on their Twitter pages.

        Even articles on Aamir Khan get negative comments (or I suppose the site admins choose to approve only negative comments for publication!). Various forums are there – in which certain members especially make threads to declare Aamir as a fluke or a failure. In fact, from whatever I have seen, there is more negativity spread against Aamir Khan and his films, than positive talk! Sometimes, some of us Aamir fans even wonder if Aamir is the most hated person in the film industry!

        Filmfare and Stardust might declare him ”most powerful” or the ”real King Khan” in their print editions. But on their websites, they usually attribute his success to ”recent spate of luck”. Mid Day recently held an Aamir Khan quiz through their site and only referred to him as a ”marketing guy”. They didn’t even use the word ”actor” (let alone star or genius!). Planet Bollywood had initially declared Ghajini, a flop during its first week! [I think their article on Ghajini's box office report in the first/second week is still available online].

        On Twitter and in the blogosphere in general, there’s an upsurge of BS comments against Aamir even if any of his old films are being shown on TV! [I mean there are more negative and hateful comments than positive ones.]

        There have been certain film blogs and entertainment websites that have spread trash even about his family. A certain reputed TV channel, around 4-5 years ago, had once spread this rumour that Aamir’s son Junaid was mentally retarded! How low can one get?!

        Certain papers and TV channels especially make it a point to report negative stuff about his films/life or either don’t publish anything at all. It’s either an ”ignore or spread negativity” policy for them!

        It’s never a case of all-round praise or gushing for him the way it is for some other actors.

        He is not seen as a genius by the media. But media feels that the public sees him as a genius and that’s the reason why they trust him.

        I am nor worried about Aamir being under or un-appreciated. I feel, Aamir has a direct relationship with his fans and audience. We convey to him whatever we feel, either compliments or criticism openly and frankly on his blog or FB. And he also knows what fans think or want of him (this is reflected in his interviews). He interacts with us one on one, from time to time. I think as fans, we don’t need media outlets/ratings/polls/awards to know or form an opinion on him or his work. He doesn’t need media or blogs praising him to skies and he knows that media won’t ever do such things no matter how much he tries to patch up with them and no matter how much he achieves.

        But yes, it’s kind of frustrating for fans, to see him or his work junked like this. His work in earlier years (I think upto 1995) was not the stuff of legends (except for certain gems like AAA, JJWS and to some extent QSQT and Raakh) and his first ATBB Raja Hindustani has got to be the worst and most undeserving film for the ATBB tag! But his stuff from Earth and Sarfarosh onwards (barring Mela and to some extent MP) is commendably better than his peers line-up in this decade.

        I feel it is unfair to him, because there are certain people who have been anointed legends/royalty or greats even despite their low-quality or repetitive work. If they can be appreciated, then why should Aamir Khan be subjected to this constant attacking?

    • mksrooney Says:

      @anu.. friend completely appreciate AND NJOYED READING UR COMMENT.

      i wanted to say the same (neither i wouldnt have been as polished :-) and nor could i have cited like u) but u saved my efforts!

      u hit it on the nail when u remark “He may not be as great as Amitabh Bachchan or legendary actors down South. Maybe all other contemporary actors are superior to him in various ways. But he’s not that bad either – so as to routinely dismiss his every accomplishment in such a manner…”

      • Thanks rooney. All I wanted to say and will finally say, is that he may not be the best or the greatest that there is. But he’s not that such a bad actor, gross human being and doesn’t have such a trashy oeuvre that he is made out to be by certain people and sections online or in the rest of electronic and print media.
        There’s all sorts of propaganda – from labeling him as a bad human being to labeling him as a bad actor. The funniest thing is that some people think he’s bribing trade analysts to report higher collections of his films and paying the media to project him as the best or the No. 1 star-actor! Aamir’s the last person to do such a thing, but certain people never stop yakking! [Sadly they make so much and so frequent noise that it becomes hard to even ignore them for long...]

    • Re: “He may not be as great as Amitabh Bachchan or legendary actors down South. Maybe all other contemporary actors are superior to him in various ways. But he’s not that bad either – so as to routinely dismiss his every accomplishment in such a manner…”

      very well-summed up Anu; even if I do have sympathy for sm’s comment re: spicing up the blandness of universal adulation :-) (better that problem than the reverse).

  8. Yes, it is a Dilip Kumar thread and we are talking Amir/SRK. :-)
    I think that is because the latter are contemporary and we *are* discussing whether Amir is ‘gifted’ or not as said by Dilip Kumar.

    To me there is something called ‘bhed chaal’ or ‘jumping on the bandwagon’. Just like the products that get popular due to commercials. Everyone wants to be seen using/wearing/having/that product.
    Amir is the latest on this scale. He’s even being called ‘Brand’ Amir. LOL!

    His popularity is the result of marketing. And since a discussion cannot be complete without comparing it with SRK, I don’t think his success was the result of marketing (maybe OSO was, but RNBDJ wasn’t so also his earlier films where he enjoyed popularity).
    So there’s nothing great about Amir’s acting which a Hrithik doesn’t bring into some of his characters (if one shouldn’t talk of SRK) or Saif.

    KJo should have shown Dilip Kumar his MNIK :-) he would have approved of it greatly too and would have appreciated SRK a lot in that.

  9. Utkal Mohanty Says:

    I think Amir is a brilliant actor. People tend to underestimate him an actor because he is not showy like Sahrukh and his acting lifts the films a few notches higher instead of drawing attention to the actor. Just one gesture in 1947: Earth or the telephone talk in DCH or the three shads of student act in DCH< RDB and 3Idiots is enough to show what a class act he is. Then spread out the performances in Raakh, Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar, Rangeela, Andaz Apna Apna, Sarfarosh, Lagaan and Ghajini,… and you will see how far ahead he is of all his contemporaries. It took a genius like Dilip to recognize another.

  10. Oldgold,
    Your repeated protestations when it comes to Aamir are getting tiring. It is one thing not to like him but a totally different thing to make disingenuous claims that you are making. Not to like him is your prerogative and as SM suggested it makes life interesting but claims like ‘his popularity is the result of marketing’ are tiresome, repetitive and hope you realise, frankly unwelcome.
    In his present state, if KJo had shown DK, MNIK he would have fallen asleep 15 min into the movie.

    • > claims like ‘his popularity is the result of marketing’ are tiresome,

      …but…but..I believe that!!! REALLY!!!

      >are tiresome, repetitive

      My comments are directly propotional to the claims of greatness/the best we have/meaningful etc etc. (does hearing that repeatedly tire you?)

      >…and hope you realise, frankly unwelcome.

      I’m sure it is ;-)
      Truth always hurts and is always unwelcome.

      • >> Truth always hurts and is always unwelcome.

        Yes Truth has other side also and is relative also…. why dont u see other side which shows some psychological prblm…

        Truth always hurts and is always unwelcome…. now this may be bitter to swallow for you…but its also truth: hurts and unwelcome

  11. myselfaamir Says:

    LOL Rajen, you made my day with this comment. On another note, There are haters and and there are “maniacal haters”, and Oldgold falls in second category as her mental set up is tuned in such a way that whenever she sees Aamir’s name, She feels compelled to put down him by any which way, which is no less an achievement as it has become her “PASSION”. Feel elated as genius attracts envy!!!!!

  12. I’m not an Aamir or SRK fan – as a matter can’t stand either one of them.

    But oldgold takes hatred of Aamir to a new level. If you despise someone, why bother commenting on everything relating to him rather than just ignoring him? That seems like an incredible waste of time and energy invested in someone you despise to keep up on what they are doing and saying or what is being said about them. I have always found that very puzzling about haters.

    • >seems like an incredible waste of time and energy invested in someone you despise

      ummmm…It helps sharpen my claws. ;-)

      >I have always found that very puzzling about haters.

      Haters?
      In my world I call it ‘the truth sayer’. The one trying to remove the purdah covering the eyes and minds of sheep. :-D

      The excessive undeserving praise is what has set me off….not hate!!!

  13. I’ll say what I usually say about Aamir. Here there are two extremes when it comes to talking about him. It’s either overly harsh criticism or incredibly excessive praise. I tend to fall somewhere in the middle with Aamir because I don’t now nor have I ever considered him one of the great actors in Hindi cinema. What he undoubtedly is is a great force for the industry. A unique “brand” (and here I’ll agree with oldgold that his marketing of himself is invariably linked to his stardom, though I don’t necessarily see this as a total pejorative) but not a very singular actor.

    But then to be honest, I don’t think there’s a single “great” star/actor from his generation. Not a truly great one. I’m speaking of the Salman-SRK-Aamir era here. Aamir stands out for me within this generation of actors not because he’s some peerless performer, (he’s not) but because what he’s done that the others haven’t is, simply put, make good movies.

  14. Well summed up, GF. Cannot disagree with anything. What makes Aamir special is he takes extremely calculated risks and succeeds. Instead of just treading the beaten path, he makes carefully calculated detours with very successful results. Abhi on the other hand totally abondons the regular path and wanders into dangerous territories with mixed results ( to be kind.) Which again is quite admirable. Whether it is because he doesnt care for the commerical side of things at all or poor judgement, we may never know.

    • alex adams Says:

      “Abhi on the other hand totally abondons the regular path and wanders into dangerous territories with mixed results ( to be kind.) Which again is quite admirable. Whether it is because he doesnt care for the commerical side of things at all or poor judgement, we may never know.”—feel, it is the latter in most occasions….

  15. Wasn’t this thread about Dilip Kumar? It is one matter your have comaprison of that era to this (Raj Kapoor-Dileep Kumar vs SRK,Aamir) but this thread has been hijacked with same Aamir vs SRK which goes on and on, in box office threads on weekly basis.

  16. Tuesday, August 31, 2010HOW KARAN JOHAR WAS INSPIRED BY SHAH RUKH KHAN?

    I was 16. I had just finished my ICSE examination, and Anand Mahendru wanted a fat man for a TV serial called Indradhanush. My mother thought I should audition and, to make her happy,I agreed. Before my audition started,I saw a very serious-looking man sitting opposite me in the same room. He had scruffy hair, had a newspaper open and was looking all over the place. I went inside, met the director and did my thing. Then this man spoke to Anand and left. I remember Anand telling me that he had come to decline a role offered to him.

    My first thought was how could that actor, who I actually thought was so scruffy, turn down a role? Just then another TV actor,slightly fresher-looking with a well-cut face, walked into meet Anand. Seeing this actor, I said,”Now this is what I call an actor.” That man with scruffy hair who had left the room was Shah Rukh Khan and the man who’d walked in later is in oblivion today.So obviously I dont have a knack for spotting talent, and in Shah Rukh Khan,even when I saw Deewana, I did spot the so-called ‘spark’.

    Then I met him in 1993 on the sets of Karan Arjun with my father. My father wanted to sign him for Duplicate. In one hour, he left a big impression on me. Full of energy,full of life and with such a tremendous sense of humour. But what I loved most about him was that when he met my father,who was not the most successful producer at that time, he gave him all respect he deserved. I used to be very sensitive about how people dealt with my father. And I felt he handled my father in the most sensitive and emotional way. It raised his bar in my head by a zillion times.

    Shah Rukh could have actually been two thing – the biggest star in the country or a spritual leader. There’s no third thing he can be. He’s evolved. He’s reached some kind of nirvana in his head already beacause of his thoughts and reading. Shah Rukh reads more than I think any librarian ever has. I think he reads a book every day. His thoughts are spritual. If he wasn’t an actor, I can imagine millions of people sitting and listening to his thoughts on life, humanity and everything. Shah Rukh Khan is my free art of living course, which I get every day.

    • Nothing exceptionable about the rest of this piece, a warm tribute to a friend from Karan Johar rather than some kind of testimony by an observer, but SRK would probably be embarrassed by this line:

      “Shah Rukh could have actually been two thing – the biggest star in the country or a spritual leader.”

      ‘Nuff said. I hope we aren’t talking about the likes of spiritual leaders like Swami Nithyananda.

  17. With due respect and apologies to the OP, Munna I will take liberty to comment on the above tribute.
    It is precisely because of these OTT pieces by KJO that he is not taken seriously. A warm tribute to a friend is fine but we have seen far too many of these when it cums to KJo and SRK. A spiritual leader??? Does he actually read what he writes? It is one thing to be able to read and speak in complete sentences but being a spiritual leader goes far beyond that. He has reached no Nirvana as he is stuck in the rat race and is fiercely competitive and at the moment he has fat chance in hell of reaching Amitabh’s level or catching up with Aaamir, two goals he is consumed by.

    • well said rajen

    • And others are not consumed by any ambitions???
      Amir isn’t after an Oscar? …or some (any) foreign feather/award? He wasn’t consumed all these years by his goal of beating SRK?

      The article is of course very silly.
      Wonder why ss put it up?
      I think it was his aim to have people laughing at them. He found the right place to post it.

  18. I’m totally taken aback as to how every thread/topic/post on every forum/blog or website ultimately boils down to Aamir vs. SRK! It’s kind of sick. I wish people left both of them alone and talked only about the person who is the actual topic of the discussion/article. Even in fan forums of these actors people discuss the individual work of these actors less and usually start comparing and downgrading other stars!

    Even TV channels have no other job except repeated everyday ”reports” and ”analysis” of the Khan wars! [Our present generation has heard more about Khan wars than they have ever studied about the World wars in their school/college textbooks!]

    I think even the stars are at fault. The stars like Raj Kapoor, Dev Anand and Dilip Kumar seemed to have such high regard for each other. Whereas these guys only keep taking jibes at each other.

    Perhaps it’s only constant comparison and cut-throat competition that rules now…

    • @ANU…firstly [Our present generation has heard more about Khan wars than they have ever studied about the World wars in their school/college textbooks!]… LOL

      secondly yaar m not sure of ur age, but i remark that.. because i have a view.. a theory [before it begins i will prewarn its kinda undevolop and khichdi type theory which i have not been able to express in a way i would have liked]

      its a generational thing imo who grew with srk aamir.

      Look in generation we belong today we have media 24 x 7. Gone are the days of past of looking at morning news paper for news, this media channels need something to sell.

      so what will they ?? (or even wat will sell at blogs)

      before answering my own questn i will like to add that in todays age no one has that much free time for learning new and interesting things, and are basically stuck in their jobs. thus when they were growing up aamir, srk etc where huge.

      thus from that moment in past come back to age of media, and busy lives tha we live today.. and people dont have much knowledge neither time for this other activites to learn, research, study.. inquire.. imo

      so combine 2+2 =4 media plus narrative of two biggest superstar (nd 3 if u include salman) we have something that can make big news. this generation has grown up to aamir-srk.

      Also i feel aamir and srk are not only filmstar, imo they represent something more! something ideological in a way one is regarded for business sense other for quality of films, one was a romantic lover and other for his kind of cinema.

      thus aamir – srk for generation that grew up on them are both very successful yet different person, one was for passion other for perfection. thus they represent something unique and moreso a class divide if i may say.

      Look at this way every person u will meet 99 % selects one of the two as favourite actor, but i feel when they fav actor, they mean a lot more than only actor, they relate to ones ideology, or i will choose i guess satyams word rather .. CURRENCY!

      thus people cant live them aside as easily as u think, either on blogs or media. they are beyond our imaginations have infiltrated life and dreams and ideologies of people. The common man was in this with the passionate star.. and urban and whiz came in with perfection guy.. and maybe somewhere even cross took place.. i guess.

      but over and above i feel as i guess i have tried to observe.. they represent more than just being actors.. its more about who they are :-)

      its like saying.. beneath their comments u can see buy decoding/analysing they mean m aamirian or sharukhian.

      (like when someone says m idealist, capitalist, liberal.. etc)

      Lastly m sure i think i havent been clear in wat i want to express mainly due to lack of time here and i have typed it first time instead of carefully devoloping a theory as i should have.. so regret that.. but thus becoz of above reason i feel aamir v srk can never stop.

      as its like

      yin yang
      day night
      positivie negative
      protons electrons

      equally opposite to each other and indeed need to exist in one imagination and reality!
      (now m seriously loss with watever i have said, so m pressing submit comment! )

      tc,

      rooney

      • Comparing SRK to Aamir is actually an insult to Aamir’s talent. Aamir chose a different path as early as Rangeela. SRK isn’t going to mutate into a ‘thespian’ in his late 40s..

        • i hope oldgold doesn’t read it……………

        • @saket… m not comparing, my point is to appreciate aamir, one needs srk (m not saying hes bad)

          bth represent two ideologies.

          for srk fans-

          to appreciate srk for them they need aamir! :-)

          and like all things in world they are equal in opposite directions..

  19. Finally a comment about Dilip Kumar.
    He’s looking very attractive in that still from Devdas.

  20. Catching up on this interview He probably just rattled off names off the top of his head without much contemplation but I thought it was interesting he didn’t mention probably the most iconic of his co-stars, Madhubala when discussing his counterparts onscreen. Surely not a deliberate omission on his part?

  21. iffrononfire Says:

    may be due to his link up rumours with madhubala

    btw she had a tragic end to her life and even kishore knew she won’t survive for long when he married her

    reel life makes it presence into real life

  22. iffrononfire Says:

    was also never approved how yousuf khan changed into dilip kumar ….didn’t we have another dilip kumar who is now a.r.rehman..

    it was a wrong precedent …naseer never changed his name and so do any of the present khans

    but ya as a performer brilliant indeed and he surely inspired many right from amitabh bachchan to present actors …

    unfortunately his throat problems didn’t allowed him to make a proper comeback after forgettable quila… this man surely deserves a better farewell so do ra jesh khanna ….

    tp see him doing a movie like wafa is pretty depressing …

    dharmendra at 78 is atleast made a proper comeback

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s