India Today cover story on Salman Khan (including Aamir on Salman)
thanks to Iamthat…

The biggest paycheck in Bollywood this year has landed. It reached a star who’s 5-foot 9-3/4 inches and weighs 78 kg. He dresses in clothes chosen by his two sisters and lives a floor below his parents. He sleeps for three hours a day and eats five meals daily. He’s Salman Khan. And he’s made Rs 170 crore and still counting from Dabangg, Rs 24 crore from Bigg Boss 4, and Rs 15 crore from three endorsements signed earlier this year. He is at the top of the entertainment game, measured in the only language Mumbai understands: money.
For someone who started work at 14 and whose first pay was Rs 75 as a background dancer, becoming the star of Bollywood’s second biggest hit ever has not been easy. The pinnacle has come 22 years after he began as a doe-eyed, silken-haired 45-kg son of a famous father, a second lead in the tepid Biwi Ho To Aisi. Salman has reason to be pleased though he cannot look you in the eye, mind you. A little accident with a surgery to fix the unflattering pouches under his eyes has ensured that he cannot take off his dark glasses for another week. But as the star sits on his black leather couch, the centrepiece of his one-bedroom flat in Mumbai, with the steaming cup of coffee to be replaced by successive glasses of Bacardi and Coke as the evening wears on, he knows his fans have seen worse. They have seen him wearing a bikini in Baaghi, dancing with a towel between his legs in Mujhse Shaadi Karoge, being a “manly” Marilyn Monroe in Jaan-e-Mann and in Dabangg, romancing a girl who was a year old when he began his career.
And they are not surprised that he now commands Rs 5 crore for each of his five endorsements; that he’s taken the ratings of the opening episode of Bigg Boss 4 to a high of 4.83, bettered only by Amitabh Bachchan’s Kaun Banega Crorepati 4 TRP of 6.21; and that his next yet-to-be-shot film is being sold at Rs 75 crore. The bhai who never grew up seems to have finally become the boy who can do no wrong. Or even if he does, it is quickly forgiven. Perhaps because he is seen as someone with his heart in the right place and his tongue in the wrong place. As an equal opportunity offender, who, if he is unprofessional, is so with everyone big or small. As a loveable lout who may be feudal and flawed but is still very funny. As a star who is less about the brand and more about the body. Which may explain why while everybody is busy wearing branded clothes, he’s happy taking them off.
Perhaps it’s because the audience watching him suspects that behind the bluster is a boy who can still get slapped by his father, scriptwriter Salim Khan, and still stands to attention when he’s on the phone. In many ways, Salman is the retrosexual man every boy would like to be. His brothers are his best friends and despite having dated four stunningly beautiful professional actors, he still believes that women should not “expose” onscreen. Unlike middle class darlings Shah Rukh Khan and Aamir Khan, film scholar Shohini Ghosh believes Salman’s films echo our more complicated “good and bad times”. Movies like Tere Naam and Garv portray him as a brooding hero while even in his most raucous comedies he often loses the girl or gets trumped by another star. Like the young Amitabh Bachchan, despite his elite upbringing, he has a common touch. He can play the folk hero of the masses as much as he can embody the rock star swagger.
Salman hasn’t worked with too many star directors and he still cannot remember the dialogue of Pyaasa that he and director Sajid Khan had to learn in acting classes with Daisy Irani, but he seems to have found a new commitment to work. Always known more for his body than his brains, he is not only completing movies in one schedule to maintain continuity of physicality and character, but he has also reserved the right of final edit. “When I see a film now, I see it from the point of view of the audience, not myself. Yuvraaj was 25 minutes too long, London Dreams would have been super 35 minutes less, and for Veer, I just needed more shooting dates. It’s my fault that I didn’t put my foot down. But I didn’t whether out of respect or not wanting a misunderstanding. Perhaps they would have been worse if I had put my foot down,” he says.
It is rare to find a star so unaccustomed to asserting his veto. Perhaps because Salman regards himself as a worker bee, who’s broken every bone in his body, save his head, at least three times. He’s always worked, whether it was as an assistant to Shashilal Nair for Rs 30 a day or as a model trying to maintain a Rs 300 bank balance. Which is why, among the Khans, he’s made the most films-71 compared to 57 for Shah Rukh and 36 for Aamir. Now the madness has a method. Still, don’t expect him to come to work before 11 a.m., kiss onscreen (“why mix business with pleasure,” he murmurs), or play a villain (“people need to see heroes”). Also make allowances for the days when he won’t want to shoot, or will do so only with dark glasses on, because his eyes are puffy. But then once he’s on the set, surrounded by his toys (an all-terrain bike, a bicycle, perhaps his Yamahas R6 and R1, and his four dogs, the oddly named Veer, My Love, Saint and Handsum) expect him to do anything the director demands, from one arm push-ups in his breakout film, Maine Pyaar Kiya, which established him as an all-India star a year after Aamir, to arguing with an invisible sky in Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam.
He sees a reason for the phenomenal success of Wanted last year, which was like Ghajini before it, a southern import, and re-established the action genre in Bollywood which involves heroes walking through doors and fighting battles with bare hands. “We’ve had the angry young man, the action hero who would fight for his family or neighbourhood, the romantic hero, the rom-com loser hero. There had to be a reaction,” he says. Enter Dabangg, which put the bhaiya in the bhai, and so was born Chulbul Pandey, to join the iconic character Salman has most often played onscreen, loverboy Prem. He’s playing him again in Ready, directed by Anees Bazmee. So it’s no surprise that Titanic and Braveheart are his kind of films-it may also explain his strange accent. “I believe the entertainment industry is for children or for the child in everyone. Somebody wants to grow up like you, somebody wants to be you, somebody wants to remember their youth by you,” he says.
He’s not a great fan of change. “I get attached to things. It took me 35 years to go from the floor above to my house here. And that happened only because Sohail (his younger brother) took over my room when I went on a world tour,” he says. Rather than being seen as a provider at large for his family, he believes they have been a great support to him. “I have no responsibilities. My family takes care of me more than I take care of them. They’ve always supported me,” he says. Especially when he’s in trouble, which can vary from being in Jodhpur Central Jail for six days in 2007 as Prisoner No. 343 in the blackbuck case to 17 days in Thane Central Jail in the hit-and-run case in 2002. His family bristles at the thought of being seen as parasites: “People behave as if he’s been parking money in our accounts. No. The greatest thing about him is that he hasn’t alienated us from his success. He wants us to enjoy it with him,” says brother, actor Arbaaz who is also the producer of Dabangg.
Film critic Nasreen Munni Kabir says Salman doesn’t show himself in real life as the perfect, intelligent man but as a feckless fellow who bumbles through life learning from his mistakes as he continuously makes them. “He becomes human to us in a more meaningful way than the high achievers,” she points out. As Salman himself says, “Some people think I’m a total jerk. And some people love me to death.” He also has a habit of loving to death, as all accounts of him stalking Aishwarya Rai at the height of their romance indicate. Salman seems to have become philosophical about his love life. “You get somebody better for you. That person gets somebody better for them,” he says in his famously cryptic way. He has finally learnt to move on romantically, though there is the odd fixation he has with casting lookalikes of his one-time girlfriends. His father puts it more poetically: “Salman suffers from divine dissatisfaction.”
For someone who grew up idolising Sanjay Dutt for his “gaadis and girls”, he’s quite impressed by his own fitness. “My body is better than it ever was,” he says, looking at himself in a mirrored wall conveniently next to the sofa on which he receives guests like a mini-head of state. “The only fat I have is under my eyes,” he says, denying he ever went in for hair grafting but quietly writing the number of the Dubai doctor who did the honours in case you need it. He keeps himself fit, whether by swimming, playing cricket or football, or simply trekking or cycling to work. He sleeps three hours a day, usually by 5 in the morning. “Either my mind wakes up and my body is tired. Or my body wakes up and my mind says ‘go to sleep’. Sometimes both are sleepy and I’m wide awake.” And sometimes he wakes up weeping, his pillow wet, dreaming of his days at The Scindia School, Gwalior.
He’s had a chequered academic career, weaving in and out of St. Anne’s High School, Mumbai; The Scindia School; St. Stanislaus High School, Mumbai; and St. Xavier’s, Mumbai, from where he was thrown out. Why? “Attendance. I always had that problem,” he mumbles. He dropped out of third year at Elphinstone College, deciding not to take an exam one day because a cricket match seemed more interesting. He also gave up the idea of admission to the JJ School of Art because he thought the crowd was too “arty” for someone who was the proud possessor of a single pair of Wranglers bought by his mother’s brother, Tiger Uncle, from Germany. “I wore them until they tore,” he says, recalling a time when the family was short of cash. His father agrees. “Remember I struggled for 10 years as an actor before I began writing. And then too, my first paycheck was Rs 10,000 for Haathi Mere Saathi.”
A Bandra boy who would often attend midnight mass with his gang after a drinking session, Salman has grown up with a Hindu mother, a Muslim father, and a Catholic stepmother. In many ways, he is Everyman. “What you see is what you get,” says director Farah Khan, who’s known him since her mother, Menaka Irani, acted with his father in a film, Bachpan, that ran for just one day. “He’s never stopped a movie or not completed it even if he knew it was a turkey in the making. When he’s good, there’s no one like him.”
As he contemplates marriage (“I’d like to have children”), a post-retirement career involving painting and working with his charity, the Being Human Foundation, the coolest thing about the always underrated Khan is that he’s happy even with his lack of inches. “It’s just a bit taller than the heroines and shorter than the villain.” Because, of course, it’s fun to beat up the bigger guy. Isn’t that what heroes do?
Salman on his films
Good, bad, indifferent. Salman Khan is proud that in a 71-film career, only 15 can be called flops.
Maine Pyar Kiya (1989), Sooraj Barjatya
Bhagyashree quit and I had no work for six months. My father had to ask G.P. Sippy to announce a film with me. Ramesh Taurani gave an advance (Rs 5 lakh) for the music, and he did.
Hum Aapke Hain Koun (1994), Sooraj Barjatya
I played Prem, a character I’m returning to in my next film, Ready. A movie works only if the love story works in it.
Andaz Apna Apna (1994), Rajkumar Santoshi
It’s one of my favourite films, like the unsuccessful Love with Revathi. But it was a little too ahead of its time.
Tere Naam (2003), Satish Kaushik
After a point, you’re wondering what’s happening here. The girl has left him and he’s mourning. Now get on with your life.
Wanted (2009), Prabhu Deva
Action is tough to do. Ive broken both wrists at the same time. And my leg twice. The only part of me that is intact is my head.
Dabangg (2010), Abhinav Kashyap
The one scene where I was dipped in mustard oil took 11 days to film. It gets in your hair, clothes, everywhere. It looks cool, but it takes time.
Some people think I’m a jerk: Salman
What do you think of the comparison between Bigg Boss 4 and Kaun Banega Crorepati 4? Who’s bigger? Salman Khan or Amitabh Bachchan?
When we launch our movies, we space them out because ticket prices are steep. But on TV, you can watch us for free and can enjoy all the shows simultaneously. So, where’s the competition? Mr Bachchan has his unique style, which he brought in last year, and now I have mine.
What does the success of Dabangg mean to you?
The movie could have gone either way. If it hadn’t worked, people would have said the ’70s genre doesn’t work anymore.
Have you become more serious about your work?
Earlier I would do films even though I knew they were bad because I needed to buy a house or it was being made by friends or for prayaschit (to atone for a previous film having done badly). Now having been in the industry so long, I’ve learnt what to do and what not do.
You would lose interest half-way through a movie?
No. I would just start following exactly what the director would tell me to do and give it my 150 per cent best (laughs).
Have you learnt from your mistakes?
A mistake by definition is not done deliberately. If you learn a lesson, it means you’re still growing. My mistakes have made me stronger, taught me the value for life and for relationships.
Do you like the popular perception people have of you?
Well some people think I’m a total jerk and some love me to death.
So which one are you?
It depends on the person in front of me. When I have to react, I do so depending on the magnitude of what has happened. I don’t hold a grudge, except maybe for a second. Otherwise, I’m very good in my space.
What’s life after movies?
Well there are a lot of things I could do. I could paint, farm, raise kids.
So are you ready to finally get married?
No, not now. I’m not ready. I don’t feel like it. Nevertheless, whenever I’ve been in a relationship, I have always wanted to get married. But I would get cold feet. I would panic if I started thinking about it too much.
Who were you in a relationship with?
All the people that you know about. What’s the point of naming them? Everyone is happy, everyone is married.
Not everyone.
Yeah, Somy (Ali) is not.
And Katrina …
Katrina is too young to get married.
And are you still scared of your father?
No. It’s respect. Even when he calls on the phone now I stand up. I can’t form two straight sentences in front of him. I still stutter and stammer, I still forget. But he’s very chilled out otherwise. We party and drink together many times. But that is when we are having fun. On serious issues, well… meri to phat jati hai.
Salman used to be very rude: Aamir
I can’t remember him but apparently Salman and I were together in Class 2 at St. Anne’s High School in Bandra. We were both Bandra boys but my first memory of meeting him was in 1987 when I was doing Raakh. It was in Aditya Bhattacharya’s house on Carter Road. He had come in to say hi to Aditya and told me he was acting in Biwi Ho To Aisi. But Andaz Apna Apna, the film we both did with Rajkumar Santoshi, was the most unpleasant experience for me. He was rudely behaved, young and brash, quite obnoxious and unprofessional. We remained actors and colleagues, no more. Often he would tell me let’s work together, and I would tell him, you’ve got to be joking.
It was only around 2002 that we became friends. I was not working, had just separated from my wife, going through a traumatic divorce. For the first time in my life, I was drinking. I met him at his home for a couple of drinks once. By then I was less judgemental and he was less aggressive. He had calmed down. He is much more serious about his work now. In Wanted, Veer and Dabangg, I can see he has really applied himself, changing the way he looked for each film and maintained the look. As an actor he is consistent in these films, not stepping out of character even once.
As celebrities, often we may not be in control of what people think of us. The perception people have of you builds over time, consciously or unconsciously. Over the two decades he has been in the public eye, I think people have become very protective of him, especially when he gets into trouble. Much of his appeal has to do with his personality. He can be charming and he is certainly good-looking. Movies like Maine Pyar Kiya, Saajan and Hum Aapke Hain Koun have played to these strengths. The movies with him that didn’t do well were primarily because they were not good.
But I am much closer to his father, Salim Khan, whom I admire immensely and have spent a lot of time with.
October 30, 2010 at 6:35 PM
must say, that have been following big boss4 this year and is interesting.
have not seen any of the previous big boss series, so cannot compare, but this one does hook you a bit!
October 30, 2010 at 10:24 PM
Very well written, which points out Mr. Salmans goods and bads with respect. Reading the entire story, i felt glad about it. I huge fan of Mr. Salman Khan and he is my idol in every aspect of life and will be till end. Cheerss…Salman ….
October 31, 2010 at 2:01 AM
I hadn’t realized that India Today was such a “green” magazine! (recycling interviews and photos from elsewhere
)
October 31, 2010 at 6:06 AM
lol
October 31, 2010 at 6:07 AM
so whens that dabanng (review 2) coming or i missed it?
anyways wishing u happy diwali in advance, as i am going in my sabbatical soon.. xams time again
and wishing a propserous new year to all.. so would come very less here.. in few days time
October 31, 2010 at 6:24 AM
Good luck on your exams, Rooney. Thanks for your Diwali wishes, and I hope you have a wonderful Diwali, too.
I’ve been unexpectedly busy the last few weeks, so haven’t written any reviews. Please give me an email or some other way to contact you, and I will let you know when it’s ready.
October 31, 2010 at 3:13 PM
masoomrooney@yahoo.co.uk
October 31, 2010 at 7:58 AM
lol
October 31, 2010 at 3:09 AM
Its very well written. Mr khan has been portrayed exactly what it is. I love the way of story telling.
October 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM
yup thnx dogabhai, but i already have placed it in New Post section, its under review right now.
but dont u think its surprising, i know its a word thats been done to death with aamir, but surely i didnt expect a suspense movie!
November 1, 2010 at 4:10 AM
this article is manupulated bt writer.
past interviews or reply to reporter ko
manupulate karkey idhar-udhar add kar diya hai.
fake article.
November 1, 2010 at 9:50 AM
5-foot 9-3/4
Hmm maybe with 4 inch heels.
November 2, 2010 at 6:36 AM
the height is certainly not correct
November 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM
More like 2 inch.
November 2, 2010 at 11:45 AM
I can go to the town in response to this comment but will desist out of respect for SM.
November 2, 2010 at 12:01 PM
Rajen, I see where you’re “head”ing, but the topic was the height of his heels.
(I’m glad you had some respect for me. I hope I haven’t lost it with this comment.
)
November 10, 2010 at 8:34 AM
Rooney:
Kashyap Out and Arbaaz/Sohail to direct DABANNG SEQUEL!!!
However, Abhinav Kashyap may not be a part of Dabangg 2. Kashyap who made his debut as a director with Dabangg rose to fame in no time. But apparently, Arbaaz Khan or Sohail Khan will direct the sequel.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Dabangg-director-out-of-the-sequel/articleshow/6899515.cms
November 10, 2010 at 8:54 AM
It has the usual denial by Arbaaz at the end, typical of these MM, Mid-Day, and nowadays even TOI stories.
November 10, 2010 at 9:23 AM
Hope it is true to the extent I’d rather see Kashyap’s obvious gifts servicing something worthier than a Dabangg series.
November 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM
Salman Khan and Pamela Anderson dance on the popular item number from ‘Dabangg’ for ‘Bigg Boss 4′.
November 20, 2010 at 4:15 PM
The multiplex myth
VIJAY NAIR
Dabangg has proved that while the multiplex has changed the economics of films, it doesn’t necessarily provide an outlet for a more urbane brand of cinema…
The truth is, cinema is the only true leveller in our socio-economic context.
“D abangg” has busted at least two major myths that Bollywood had invented for itself in recent times. The first being a bound script is mandatory for the mega block buster to bring in the big bucks. Remember all that fuss about “3 Idiots” and who really deserved credit for the film’s somewhat jumbled screenplay? Another myth that the Salman Khan pot-boiler debunked has to do with that elusive ‘multiplex’ audience that the larger production houses decided to cater to with limp offerings like “Pyar Impossible”, “We are Family”, “Tasveer” and “Kites”. All these movies and many others were meant for the more sophisticated urban audience at these plush Meccas of film viewing who apparently preferred their cinematic diet more gourmet and less masala. Despite the fact that most of them sank without a trace, many filmmakers continued to believe in a mythical creature called the multiplex audience.
Assumptions?
They seemed to be convinced that such a creature actually exists. The one who frequents only the smaller cinema halls in suave malls and needs to chomp through tall packets of popcorn and nachos doused in chilly dip instead of the stale samosas and chips fried in dubious oil that were on offer in the crumbling “Regal Talkies” cafeteria with the sneering man overseeing the counter. The latter was reduced to the status of a “single screen”, never mind that some of these dilapidated halls could accommodate more numbers than all the single screens put together in the glittering mall. From Indore to Ahmedabad, from Delhi to Bangalore, the multiplex was the most visible symbol of the new shining India.
That they changed the economics of films and film-making cannot be disputed. Films don’t need to run for 25 to 50 weeks to be deemed a smash hit anymore. Just the returns from the first one or two weeks are enough to educate us about their success or failure. The fundamentals of retail management have always advocated volumes. Multiplexes were instrumental in increasing the number of shows multi-fold. You didn’t have to wait for a month to catch the latest blockbuster. The first weekend ensured as many people managed to catch it in their neighbourhood as were willing. It is virtually unheard of nowadays to hear anyone complain about the disappointment of returning home because tickets weren’t available. The higher ticket rates are not a deterrent for the avid fans who want to catch the latest on the big screen in their gold and premium class luxury.
What has not been clear over the last three or four years is whether multiplexes had changed the audience profile of the most democratic of Indian entertainment. Do more attractive interiors necessarily mean a more sophisticated audience with more refined tastes? The families drive in for the movies in larger cars and park them in multi-level labyrinthine car parks, the dating youngsters who snuggle to each other in their seats wear designer wear. You no longer worry about who could be seated next to you when you decide on your evening’s entertainment. But do all these changes also mean that the audience is ready to experiment with a more urbane brand of films?
The signals were confusing all along. Why would a smart social commentary like “Firaq” that plays out like a relentless thriller fail so miserably despite bagging all the critics’ awards besides wowing audience in international festivals? On the other hand, would there be a parallel galaxy of Ranvir Shorey, Konkana Sen Sharma, Rajat Kapoor and Sahana Goswami if it wasn’t for the multiplex phenomenon? Is it correct to surmise that the audience for a “Life in a Metro”, or “Hazaron Khwaishein Aisi”, or “Dor” is very different from the one who watches a “Singh is Kinng”, or “Ghajini”?
Unpredictable
The box office prophets of yore made a distinction between the front stalls and the balcony audience. The former would whistle and shower coins on their screen idols while the latter looked down in grim disapproval. So it wasn’t uncommon for them to predict while a film appealed to one section, it had nothing to offer for the other. Only to be proved wrong. For, the eccentric Indian cinema buff has made seamless transitions between the two seating zones just as his tastes have veered from the sublime to the ridiculous. In the days gone by, when a much-awaited film starring the current heartthrob released, it wasn’t unusual in the first weekend to find a perfectly turned out bourgeoisie family seated next to an auto rickshaw driver. The compromise was resorted to because balcony tickets were sold out even in the black market and the middle class family couldn’t wait to watch the action. Just as regularly, a front stalls frequenter decided to give himself the luxury of watching a film with the balcony crowd.
The truth is, cinema is the only true leveller in our socio-economic context. From an MGR to an Aamir Khan, the raw charisma of these demigods cuts across social classes and knows no refinement. The biggest hits attract audiences of all kinds in all types of theatres. Be it a big budget “Ghajini” or “3 Idiots”, a modest “Peepli Live” or “Attithi Tum Kab Jaoge”, all of them became profitable because of patronage from different classes of cine goers. Sure there are films that appeal more to one section of the audience. But that distinction is based more on a metro city versus mofussil town and not the single screen versus the multiplex difference.
“Dabangg” settles the debate once and for all. The film rides on the raw appeal of Salman Khan and has nothing else on offer. Whether he is raising one eyebrow to demonstrate myriad expressions ranging from romance to ridicule or bursting into an impromptu jig in the middle of a brutal fight scene or serenading his lady love like a roadside Romeo, the sheer energy of his performance manages to hook you regardless of your background.
It doesn’t take long for you to realise what this mindless mayhem of a movie offers to the appreciative audience is another Rajnikant. And anyone who believes the appeal of Rajnikant is restricted to a particular class is being foolish.
You don’t need a Japanese to tell you otherwise.
http://www.hindu.com/mag/2010/11/21/stories/2010112150180400.htm
November 20, 2010 at 6:04 PM
I don’t agree with very much in this piece….
1)For years I certainly have believed that Bollywood was the world’s only industry that had shrunk its potential audience base as opposed to expanding it. It’s not just Dabangg but some other films that have also established this in past years. Having said that the multiplexes are still the drivers of this Bollywood economy. The vast majority of successes every single year are still multiplex ones and despite a Ghajini or a Dabangg Bollywood’s best talents are nonetheless not following these formats. Add to this the ‘auteur’ problem so that filmmakers like Mehra can also succeed only with the multiplexes.
2)Of course there is another question here — what multiplexes? These have mushroomed over the last decade and there is now a sea of multiplexes across the land that behave in certain ways but at the same time one must also account for differences in taste. In one sense it is not surprising that Ghajini and Dabangg could gross as much in these last couple of years. Why? Because there are now multiplexes even in very many smaller centers which just wasn’t true for example in 2003. In other words the areas where the market for such films would be strongest are a little more ‘influential’ in terms of impacting the overall gross than they used to be. These films do the best because they work with the largest cross-section of the audience. But even here a stronger multiplex film like 3I is very significantly ahead.
3)Leaving aside the fact that I consider putting Salman and Rajni in the same sentence preposterous there is nonetheless a certain bourgeois prejudice that gets revealed here. First of all the sense that somehow a film like Dabangg is ‘plotless’ and has ‘nothing’ to it. Presumably all those SRK films from DTPH to RNBDJ crossed new frontiers in script-writing! But secondly there is an ideological operation in evidence here where the ‘political charge’ of a star like Rajni and his entire history is effaced by converting him into a kind of ‘circus’ (yes he’s done it to himself too but all such stars late in the game trade on their cultural capital this way.. but they still stand for something specific in the minds of their viewers). It’s as if one can explain away anything by suggesting ‘hey it’s Rajni’. Similarly they’re now trying to do this with Salman. First off there’s a gross over-reading of what Dabangg means for Salman but also a poor understanding of the ‘meaning’ of Dabangg even otherwise. I made this point earlier but I’d argue that Dabangg is not even as old school as Ghajini and in many ways represents the new ‘debased’ sense of masala. This is precisely the sort of masala multiplex audiences are comfortable with. Without the message and politics that was very much part of the texture of this (super)genre in the 70s. So there is no mystery here. But in any case there is a certain ‘meaning’ to Dabangg. It isn’t ‘nothing’. The bourgeois reading here tries to make it about nothing (‘mindless stuff’) and then attributes the gross to the lead star (how come dozens of other masala films with the same star were nowhere even close by an order of magnitude?! If it is about the ‘quality’ of the product well then it isn’t only about Salman is it?!).
January 6, 2011 at 5:11 PM
Salman Interview
Hrithik is a child
http://www.mumbaimirror.com/article/30/2011010720110107030505540799cd6c5/Hrithik-is-a-child.html
January 6, 2011 at 10:37 PM
hahaha…short and to the point Q/A….nice interview…
January 7, 2011 at 12:40 AM
Nice interview.. Salman doesnt talk much, but is always to the point
January 7, 2011 at 4:01 AM
Thanks Kassam for the interview.
Well it was fun reading what Salman had to say. The guy says exactly what is in his heart and thats what us Salman fans love about him.