The Enduring Appeal of ‘Dil Chahta Hai’
thanks to Munna…
LINK

This year marks the tenth anniversary of “Lagaan” (“Land Tax,” or “Once Upon a Time in India”), a historical saga packed with the emotional pull of right versus might. In addition to wide acclaim in India, “Lagaan” won awards at many international festivals and was nominated for an Oscar for best foreign language film, helping it become one of the best-known Hindi movies outside India. Its strong performances, classic sports-movie plot, lovable and morally superior underdogs, period drama details, and gorgeous music by A. R. Rahman, who has Oscars of his own for “Slumdog Millionaire,” ensure it has remained an appealing, heart-tugging film for a decade.
There’s another film–a much less epic film–from the same year that also deserves to be celebrated. “Dil Chahta Hai” (“What the Heart Wants,” sometimes titled “Do Your Thing”) is so different from “Lagaan” on the surface that it may be surprising to remember they were released within two months of each other. “Dil Chahta Hai” tells the story of the sibling-like friendship between three recent university graduates as they begin their adult lives. Akash (played by Aamir Khan, also the star and producer of “Lagaan”) is brash and slightly prickly, Sid is the sensitive, earnest artist, and making peace between them is Sameer, who takes and breaks decisions far too easily.
The three leads all have their own love interests, but the film’s emotional heart is squarely centered on the trio’s relationships with each other. They contrast enough to provide the friction necessary for drama, while none of them are shown as perfect or always right. As the story unfolds, the characters learn that both freedom and responsibility are essential ingredients to happiness.
The film’s writer and director, Farhan Akhtar, remains influential in contemporary Hindi cinema as a director, producer, writer and actor. Like many power players in Bollywood, he has impeccable family connections—his father is renowned writer and lyricist Javed Akhtar—but he demonstrated his own talent with this remarkable debut feature film.
Underneath its fresh surface, Mr. Akhtar built “Dil Chahta Hai” on some traditional masala bones, notably in each of the three romances. Akash gets the classic “boy likes girl, but there’s an obstacle.” The twist here is that the most significant obstacle is Akash’s inability to handle his own feelings. Poor Akash is as glib as ever on the surface, but we see the psychological toll wreaked by his self-defense. His worst enemy is himself.
Sid’s ill-fated romance is the most unconventional: he falls for a much older woman whose history would elicit harsh moral judgment by some Bollywood films. Alcoholic and divorced, she is still portrayed as worthy of affection even though Sid’s mother and Akash disapprove. After the tragic end of their relationship, it’s possible that Sid doesn’t mind his own suffering too much because it was the natural consequence of following his heart. At the center of the most mixed-up romance, Farhan Akhtar has cycled us back to the essential Bollywood principle of virtuously suffering for your true love, at the same time quietly whispering “even if your family and friends don’t agree.” It’s an old-school ideal with a hint of new-generation individualism.
for more follow the link..
September 27, 2011 at 8:02 AM
ROTFL!
Marking the *tenth anniversary* of films!
The last couple of days one has been bombarded with stupid articles.
One can be excused on grounds of *selling the film*, but THIS????
*groan*
September 27, 2011 at 8:06 AM
This was a good read even if I cannot agree with the author’s insistence on finding masala analogies in a film which is very much the ‘un-masala’ deal. Some of the tropes she refers to are cultural ones rather than specific masala ones.
Also “rich and complex” would not be my terms of choice for this film.
Leaving this aside there is absolutely no doubt that this has been the single most influential Hindi film over the last decade or so. There have been other important films, greater films, certainly very iconic films but none more influential than this one.
I’d say the film’s greatest strengths are its freshness and spontaneity and even more than these its visual qualities. I think the film retains these qualities after all these years.. certainly nothing that follows in its wake seems better in this or most other respects including the most obvious ‘re-write’ recently in ZNMD. DCH heralded the emerging multiplex ‘zeitgeist’ (that much used and abused word!) though ironically there weren’t that many multiplexes at all when the film released and it couldn’t quite become the big grosser that many films since have managed to become relying on a see of multiplexes. Nonetheless it had a very impressive 18 crore or so gross in 2001 which mostly came from Bombay and parts of Delhi and a few centers in the South added a little bit. To put this in context it was still a top 5 grosser that year. But this also shows how it’s not just about gross with influential films. Because films that establish new paradigms often don’t profit the most. Here too it’s about repetition. Once the paradigm is in the place the audience gradually increases for a similar attempt.
Another way to understand DCH’s significance is to state that it marks the shift from SRK’s Yashraj and Yashraj-inspired cinema to a newer kind of multiplex fare. After this what was understood as ‘cutting edge’ by certain audiences underwent a sea-change and of course Lagaan had set the ball rolling earlier in a more general sense.
Remarkably Aamir had Lagaan and DCH about 2 months apart! Must add once more here that I’ve never liked Aamir in the film’s first half. Have never found him persuasive on this score though Saif and Akshaye had great outings.
September 27, 2011 at 8:13 AM
This is without a doubt the most influential film (for better and worse) since its release. So persistent is its “residue” that it’s a little strange knowing ten years have passed since its release.
September 27, 2011 at 8:16 AM
I still enjoy most parts of DCH on repeat viewings tho one story line that suffers on repeat viewing is the Aamir-Preity track.
September 27, 2011 at 8:39 AM
I did wonder why we were seeing so many Lagaan 10 years homages but nothing for DCH in the actual mainstream media. So I just ended up scribbling my own because the film stays close even after all these years. If I may indulge in some cheap publicity!
http://morningmedia.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/ten-years-of-dil-chahta-hai/
I also heard something about Akhtar throwing a bash. Not sure if it is true.
September 27, 2011 at 1:46 PM
Nice stuff, Gradwolf.
September 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM
Good read here.. thanks..
September 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM
This was the first truely representative film reflecting the ethos of the hip English-speaking, western lifestyle adopting college crowd. The subtlety of emotions was a welcome reprieve from the typical OTT KJo-YRF fare which had become prevalent circa 2001. DCH was totally out-of-whack with small town middle class sensibilities, ie, those who generally enjoy masala earthy movies.
I guess the collections of the movie in those days reflected the percentages. If this were released today, it most certainly wouldve done a ZNMD level of business.
September 27, 2011 at 1:51 PM
gradwold suggested this and you seem to be saying the same that Yashraj/Johar made over the top films and DCH represented a new tone. I am only amused because this was the charge that older brand of cinema and its proponents had against the ‘bad old days of masala’! How perspectives change with time!
September 27, 2011 at 2:30 PM
I Dont think DCH is a great film.Only Aamir fans think it is great film.
September 27, 2011 at 2:38 PM
It certainly cannot compare with gems like Houseful and Thank You.
September 28, 2011 at 3:32 AM
Don’t worry, sunil, fans are allowed to exaggerate, go OTT, and declare a film iconic.
DCH was a film about wannabes like many others (or was it the prototype?)
Satyam isn’t consistent here. If the non rootedness is criticized then so must this be.
It is well made like ‘all’ Farhan films, but only ‘this’ gets accolades.
As for Lagaan. Fans are also allowed to make mountains out of molehills.
It was a watchable film, and entertaining. I liked it too, but am hardly in awe of it.
Is it great because it was nominated for the sacred oscars?
Well so was Slumdog Millioniare (more rooted than DCH IMO – LOL).
At least the latter didn’t show designer slums like the designer village of Lagaan with its well fed hero and others crying about no crop and rain for some years.
Internet allows fans to keep the memory alive by coming up with these kinds of celebrations, and some with other media links use those too.
‘Fan’ oriented views cannot be taken seriously.
September 28, 2011 at 7:35 AM
actually I don’t believe I was offering a personal opinion on either film! It was more about questions of influence. A film can be influential whether it is rooted or not!
“‘Fan’ oriented views cannot be taken seriously.”
thanks for letting us know..!
September 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM
I’m curious.
What was their influence?
September 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM
DCH is truly a cult film with cult music.
One of the films (perhaps the only non rahman music) that made bollywood music “cool” ( in a nice way)
This film has formed a part of “growing up” for many .
(certain folks like yours truly like to be in perpetual phase of “growing up” is a different matter…lol)
September 27, 2011 at 5:12 PM
The problem with chandra barots don or farhan akhtars DCH or mathew mathans sarfarosh is the spectre that these overpowering efforts casts on the rest of their careers
September 27, 2011 at 5:20 PM
Don’t think John Matthew Mathan or Chandra Barots are talents in any true sense. They were just working off good scripts. In Farhan Akhtar’s case though he has real skills but he lacks real ambition. Despite this parts of Lakshya were quite good. And perhaps only a few moments in Don. One gets the sense his heart is really in acting and that’s a pity. It’s at least partially the case that some of these guys are just not willing to put in the hard work on a consistent basis that is required to direct regularly.
September 27, 2011 at 5:29 PM
Farhan \akhtar is quite talented–definitely more than above average.
One who can give a DCH as a debut can never be underestimated.
And with ZNMD, a new actor has arisen.
That coupled with his own production/directorial capabilities and above average script sense and sensibilities—this is a potent mix
Although the script and proceedings were chamelessly tilted twoards farhan in znmd ( in the presence of much bigger stars)—he did carry off some scenes well—yes, the scenes that matter
and separate the “men from the boys” eg the one with Naseer.
It wasnt anything excpetional in znmd but enuf to signal the shape of things to come.
Had mentioned this much ealrier but now there are confirmed reports of farhan as mehras “milkha singh”–should be a good film
September 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM
yes Farhan is doing the Mehra film which is quite disappointing as far as I’m concerned. In fairness I think Mehra was finding it hard to attract some of the actors he wanted, probably with good reason as I honestly don’t see the great merits of this subject, but nonetheless this casting choice just makes it even less interesting for me. Hope he has a success here nonetheless as he shouldn’t lose all momentum.
September 27, 2011 at 5:35 PM
The comparison with mattthan or chandra barot was not because their talents are comparable.
infact barot only really filmed well written script/screenplay/dialogues.
They are just random examples of a club of directors whose DEBUT worked bigtime (for whatever reason) and the rest of their work could never really match up.
Obviously there are much better examples if one is willing to exert.
September 27, 2011 at 5:50 PM
not sure if Farhan is a bad choice for Mehras Milkha.
From my impression, the film is not only about milkhas exploits on the running track but also covers the whole gamut of partition, violence and milkhas homelesseness etc.
The one-line brief seems (from what ive heard form common acquaintances) —”running was nothing new for Milkha–he has been doing that since birth just to survive…”
May have a good film here
September 28, 2011 at 3:07 AM
With ref to first commenter’s post–There is nothing laughable about celebrating the tenth anniversary of a classic well-loved film that also happens to be a game-changer in some ways. Recently on a Bolly board, fans celebrated the first anniversary of Dabangg. Well, DCH certainly deserves its celebrations. One of my favourite films really and not just for Aamir–who IMO did full justice to his role, never mind the sceptics. But the film was a complete package really , with standout performances from all actors, even the smaller ones . Saif ofcourse was the big winner with this film. All in all a splendid romcom that had its heart and brain in the right place.
Good films need to be celebrated on their anniversaries, at least once in ten years. So much of work goes into the making of a good team effort. Here is an article that appeared in mid-May 2009, on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of Sarfarosh–which is simply my favourite Aamir film. The article is splendid, explaining the run up to the film’s very concept, the manner in which the film was made in as authentic a manner as possible–a sincere effort that paid off.
http://www.screenindia.com/news/class-act/459574/
September 28, 2011 at 3:15 AM
Responses to some of the comments:
DCH would havea done a little more than ZNMD today, mainly because it was a killer music track, which was a rage then, and would have been a bigger rage today.
Milkha looks a very interesting project to me for the following reasons:
- An inspiring bio of an Indian icon can do very well, if handled the right way.
- Milkha is the right person to take up as a bio. He is true Indian hero, but people know so little about him and his personal life
- His personal life itself seems to be textured, with a colourful rural background
- His achievement of best eevr athletic performance by an Indian athlete on tracks yet his failure in getting a medal has the right dram of victory and loss melded in one single moment.
- An athlete running on a track is very photogenic.
- A known face like Akshay or Abhishek would have difficulty selling itself as Milkha. Farhan in many ways is the best choice possible. And now the project looks like it can indeed turn into a good film.
September 28, 2011 at 8:19 AM
Re: – An athlete running on a track is very photogenic.
Even his mother will not accuse Farhan of being photogenic.
On a serious note, from what I know Milkha’s life story is not peppered with enough blissful moments for it to be an engaging biopic for the Multiplex monsters. Farhan is a decent enough actor and while slight physically, is hardly athletic. I will be interested but remain skeptical about the commercial viability.
September 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM
Good Points utkal and LS^^^
September 28, 2011 at 6:19 AM
A Garam Masala is more iconic and popular than a DCH.
If DCH is such an acclaimed film then why it is just average and a low grosser at that time.
September 28, 2011 at 7:40 AM
It wasn’t a low grosser at all relative to genre. was a top 5 grosser that year. With a proper multiplex network available at that point I believe it would have been a huge grosser.
On the rest I see we’re getting into non-serious terrain again.
September 28, 2011 at 9:57 AM
Thank god someone said it. I’ve been longing for the six year anniversary pieces on Garam Masala.
September 28, 2011 at 6:15 PM
good writeup.
September 29, 2011 at 12:35 AM
‘A Garam Masala is more iconic and popular than a DCH.’
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Anyway, speaking of tenth anniversaries, here is a write up on TOI site, today–about 10th anniversary of Chandni Bar, a film that won four national awards–as per this article. Was news to me; wow.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Chandni-Bar-completes-10-years/articleshow/10157545.cms
September 30, 2011 at 9:01 AM
“A Garam Masala is more iconic and popular than a DCH.”
Of course GM was sucha big Hit(?) it grossed less than Aamir’s flop MP after all.
BTW was GM nominated or did it win any awards?