A Kapoor by Chance (Open Magazine)
LINK


On 26 January, India’s Republic Day, Karan Johar’s Dharma Productions released Agneepath, a much-trumpeted remake of the 1990 cult classic of the same name. Among those who watch and wait for Hindi films, there was a buzz of anticipatory questions: what was Karan Johar thinking, remaking father Yash Johar’s most beloved movie? Could debutant director Karan Malhotra’s vision ever live up to the memories of Mukul Anand fans? How could the too-beautiful Hrithik possibly step into the impossibly large shoes of Bachchan’s caustic, sneering Vijay Dinanath Chauhan?
By afternoon, however, as the first-day-first-show folk got to their computers, everyone was talking about something else. Trending on Twitter was not #HrithikRoshan, #KaranJohar or even #Agneepath, but #RishiKapoor.
After a lifetime of being typecast as a baby-faced love machine, the 59-year-old actor’s concentrated villainy as Rauf Lala has surprised Hindi film fans. Both gloriously filmi and entirely convincing, Rishi Kapoor’s performance is not only Agneepath’s biggest talking point, but also the one thing about the film on which everyone agrees.
As proprietor of an empire in which meat exports form a front for a sleazy business of underage female flesh and cocaine, Kapoor’s Lala has the task of embodying unmitigated evil while also being the father-substitute under whose watchful eye our hero grows to full gangsterhood. He must be both the ruthless kasai (butcher) with glowering eyes and the portly Muslim patriarch, mai-baap for the poorest of his community. At one point in the film, Rauf Lala is double-crossed and loses his son, and despite the terrible things his character does in running his unsavoury empire of business, Rishi makes you feel, for a moment, something akin to grief. I cannot think of anyone else who could have done it.
There is something about Rishi Kapoor’s face that makes you believe. It was true in 1970, when he was the slightly overweight teenager in Mera Naam Joker who made his entry by falling clumsily into the middle of a ring of expertly-skating classmates—and falling as clumsily in love with his sophisticated young teacher Miss Mary (Simi Garewal); it was true through the 1980s and 90s, when he managed to convincingly romance a long line of nubile actresses who kept growing further away from him in age. And it is more true than ever today, when he seems increasingly able to transform himself from Rishi Kapoor into the charming Sardar uncleji of Love Aaj Kal (2009), the anxious producer Romy Rolly of Luck By Chance (2009), or the hapless maths teacher of Do Dooni Char (2010).
Perhaps Lata Mangeshkar was onto something: she once called Rishi the most talented of the Kapoors, because his performances came without the baggage of mannerisms—without the bombast, melancholic excess or ada (stylish charm) so integral to the star personas cultivated by his grandfather Prithviraj, his father Raj, or his uncle Shammi. But despite his fine, often nuanced work, many of us who grew up in the 80s and 90s simply took it for granted that this man, whose cherubic face retained an uncanny vulnerability despite the legendary Kapoor kilos having begun to fill out his Fair Isle sweaters, should continue to dance his way through the hearts of younger and younger heroines. After all, he was the original loverboy.
for more follow the link..
February 24, 2012 at 2:36 PM
I haven’t heard about the film mentioned here (Chintuji) but it sounds very interesting. On the rest this is a wonderful tribute though I have a strong disagreement on at least one point which I tweeted about earlier (Rohan Sippy’s tweet alerted me to this piece):
@BhopalHouse @rohansippy how can anyone possibly be a greater ‘star son’ than Raj Kapoor?
@BhopalHouse @rohansippy Also I am unsure if I can embrace this Agneepath from the actor who did Akbar. This isn’t like Henry Fonda going completely against type and doing a mesmerizing, ‘evil’ turn in Once upon a time in the West. Rishi is indeed very effective in Agneepath but I am more than suspicious of the ‘politics’ of giving him such a part in a ‘remake’ that is already fraught with questionable decisions in more ways than one. So you have at any rate one of the most lovable figures in the entire Hindi film canon in Akbar and also one who remains one of the best exemplars of that glorious 70s masala tradition made to do this makeover and represent a very nasty sort of ghettoized Muslim character who is willing to sell girls of any age. In a film that is already another one in a now growing line of somewhat ‘deconstructive’ efforts when it comes to thinking about the masala tradition and certainly ‘reconfiguring’ it the choice of this part is more than a little curious. I do not disagree that Rishi acquits himself very well here (incidentally I am less sanguine about his current innings in general) but I think one cannot ignore the contexts.
February 24, 2012 at 2:37 PM
Initially meant to make this point in a brief note on Agneepath but have done so here because it is raised by the piece.
February 24, 2012 at 3:11 PM
Satyam, Chintuji was a really good outing by Rishi, If you ask me I would put this one above Do Dooni Chaar that he recently did. It’s a rare gem of a movie. A very low budgeted underrated movie. Check it out if you have time.
February 24, 2012 at 3:17 PM
satyam, you *must* watch ‘chintuji’. The only flawed part is towards the end.
It’s a delicious satire of an actor (Rishi Kapoor, representing himself) and the worshipping attitude that the common man has for film stars.
February 24, 2012 at 3:20 PM
thanks.. will look for this..
thanks to Bachchan1 to 10 as well.. I liked Do Dooni Char a lot.
February 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM
DDC is far, far better that Chintuji. Found the latter harmless but insipid.
February 25, 2012 at 5:24 AM
No comparison between the two I think.
While DDC is a straight ‘lesson’ or ‘showing the wrong’ kind of film, Chintuji is full of satire almost in every scene right from the first one, losing it in the last few minutes.
Since I prefer satires my choice would be Chintuji, though I liked DDC very much too.
So Satyam, I think your tastes are closer/identical to GF’s and far removed from mine
you’d better listen to him.
February 24, 2012 at 3:28 PM
Agree with you there Oldgold, Ending could have been better scripted. But overall a really good one.
February 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM
Great piece and am glad Lataji agrees with me.
February 24, 2012 at 5:41 PM
Bollywood insiders vs. outsiders
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/life/article2923471.ece
February 24, 2012 at 6:00 PM
“However, can anyone argue that Ranbir Kapoor, Hrithik Roshan or Kareena Kapoor wouldn’t have made it big if they weren’t star kids? That they are not only incredibly good-looking but immensely talented as well? Is there anyone who will not agree that Aamir Khan has the best brain in the business?”
Aamir’s is a somewhat different example because when he debuted industry connections weren’t the necessity they seem to be now. But on the rest and leaving aside the merits of the claim (on the looks and talent) I find the suggestion rather weird. Because if you have an industry that insists on insiders or at the most models who are famous from elsewhere the question of looks and/or talent doesn’t arise. Without the connection people just wouldn’t be cast for the same sorts of projects (in other words they would be so in films that wouldn’t really get them very far even if they were seen as doing well) and the audience also wouldn’t show up! Along the same lines the whole cynically employed ‘self-made’ claim for SRK (and only occasionally for Akshay) is also beside the point for the same reason. Because again in the early 90s it wasn’t necessary to have industry bloodlines. SRK of course had two very famous TV serials (Fauji, Circus) and was well-known in any case. Not to take away the fact that these guys didn’t enter the industry based on genealogy but the point is that had they debuted say a decade later they wouldn’t have been given a second look.
So contra the author there is a fairly easy answer here!
February 24, 2012 at 7:05 PM
I hate these hyperbolic articles that try to elevate every person, event and performance to some divine, exalted status. This article is so obsequious it makes me sick.
February 24, 2012 at 10:43 PM
If you grease right palms they will write about you 2 Ami
lol
February 25, 2012 at 7:22 AM
lol @ greasing palms
actually find rishi a class act
not many will agree with me that even ranbir (barring rockstar) has not reached rishis stage yet.
Rishis two main probelms were–
a)He got pigeon-holed into the ‘romantic loverboy’ with zilch variety
b) (in his own words)-his career unfortunately coincided with a bigger ‘cyclone’ (bachchan) which took all else in its wake
will probably mention more on rishi
as of now–it will suffice to say–that ironically, for me, his best role/performance yet was his furst
‘mera naam joker’
the bits with simi grewal were-not only his own, but perhaps one of the most exquisitely nuanced bits of raj kapoors career (infact amongst the annals of mainstream bollywood)
ps–he had loads of good songs etc-as a movie, karz -the film and the music is a weakness for me (ironical that Rockstar -though not theme wise, but interms of the ‘rockstar’ bit, enabled ranbir to get a career defining moment )
February 25, 2012 at 7:32 AM
‘Karz’ to ‘rockstar’
It would be good if satyam cums up with a sort of analytical ‘comparative piece’ here
Dont think this has been pointed out before
though they are not exactly comparable, in the genre, scale of success, sensibilites or the stage of career for both–but it is uncanny
just came to my mind off the hook
what a coincidence
With both, the dad/son seem to have got a career defining moment
in one, LP was at his peak and in the other, well, ive said enuf on AR Rahmans mercurial moment
well, can even extend the comparison to the leading ladies.
dint mind the demure tina munim
adnwell, NArgis F-lemme not say more lol
Hope i could extend this to the directors as well
though subhash ghia is now everyone whipping boy and a butt of jokes, but he WAS a big force for decades (as industry watchers like satyam who werre porobably active @ that time liekm satyam will suffice)
Wasnt really active at that time, but retrospectively can sense a certain place for ghai in a certain ‘masala pop’ (non bachchan alternative, that few have achieved
As for Imtiaz ali–the ‘heights’ he reached in a few moments in rockstar (albeit with flaws) are enuf for me to to name him as a promising name for the future
Unsurprisingly, the other name for the future has okayed imtiaz alios next –would be nice to see Hritik with Imtiaz—hopefully with AR Rahman
Will be an exciting thing to watch for me(hope they dont mess it up by taking Kareena)
February 25, 2012 at 10:13 AM
Here’s something on Rishi Kapoor’s ‘Chintuji’.
http://memsaabstory.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/chintu-ji-2009/http://memsaabstory.wordpress.com/2009/12/01/chintu-ji-2009/
February 25, 2012 at 11:54 AM
suhan=oldgolds new name?
cum on oldgold-stop being a naughty kid
grow up
ps–satyam–what did u feel bout karz and the point above wrt rockstar–pray shed some light
February 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM
???
I’ve always posted under my name, albeit very infrequently, and mainly on those issues that interest me i.e., Hindi films prior to the mid 80s. And Rajesh Khanna
Though my Kaka OCD is clearly nothing compared to what I see here from various people for the stars that generate the most discussion here (SRK, Salman, Aamir, the Bachchans, etc.). And neither do I have the slightest interest in the endless discussions on the box office.