Godard’s Own Country, The IFFK and the oddities of Malayali cinephilia (Caravan)

LINK

[Renowned filmmaker Adoor Gopalakrishnan interacts with children at Thiruvananthapuram’s Public Library in 2008. In 2000, he decided to make the city permanent venue for the festival and accessible to anyone for a nominal fee of S100.]

THE FIRST THING I HEAR IN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM is a Kim Ki-duk joke. A Malayali goes to Seoul and is wandering the streets of the South Korean capital. But no one seems to know where the famous filmmaker lives. Tired and disheartened, the Malayali is about to give up when he sees a house bearing the sign “Beena Paul has blessed this house”—and he knows his search has come to an end.

If that seems a bit hard to decipher at first, worry not. Like the film festival that spawned it, the joke depends on a sensibility that’s simultaneously international art-house and merrily, irrevocably local.

It requires you to know who Kim Ki-duk is—an art-house director whose films often bomb at his country’s box office, but who is internationally renowned for his alternately savage and lyrical cinema (his Pieta won the Golden Lion at Venice this year). It also requires you to know who Beena Paul is—the Artistic Director, since 2000, of the International Film Festival of Kerala (IFFK), a woman of remarkable foresight and enthusiasm. It assumes you know that Beena Paul curated a hugely popular Kim Ki-duk retrospective at IFFK as far back as 2005, making him a household name in the state. And last but not least, it assumes (an ability to appreciate the irreverent marshalling of) local knowledge: many Christian homes in Kerala have a sign outside proclaiming ‘Jesus Christ has blessed this house’.

The religious metaphor has its place in the joke, too. The IFFK, whose 17th edition will run from 7 to 14 December 2012, is the largest secular festival in a multi-religious state. Every December, Kerala’s rather sleepy capital city, Thiruvananthapuram, plays host to what is arguably the most widely attended film festival in South Asia, with screenings in many theatres witnessing such a massive press of people, especially in the initial days, that people constantly joke about the IFFK-as-pilgrimage. “The first film I went to last year was at Ajanta, and the crowd outside was just a mob. People were mock-chanting ‘Swamiye Ayyapo’—because it felt like being at the Sabarimala temple,” said Praveena Kodoth, an economics professor at Thiruvananthapuram’s Centre for Development Studies.

The numbers are impressive. Last year’s festival, held from 9 to 16 December, had 9,232 registered delegates. “If you include media-persons, officials and guests, the number of people registered came to over 11,000,” says Beena Paul Venugopal.

But what makes the IFFK remarkable isn’t so much the numbers as something else—a popular enthusiasm for world cinema that, far from being limited to the post-liberalisation English-speaking metropolitan elite that tends to dominate film festival audiences in other urban centres, seems to cut across class. The most obvious (but also most far-reaching) sign of this wide-ranging interest is the fact that the festival handbook, as well as the daily free newsletter brought out during each IFFK, are bilingual. In the case of the handbook, section headings and introductions are in English, but each film synopsis is provided in both English and Malayalam. Venugopal is full of stories about running into festival regulars who come from all walks of life: auto rickshaw drivers in Malappuram, or Thiruvananthapuram nurses who take leave for IFFK. “The funny thing about Kerala is that… a film festival is not only judged by the quality of the films or the people who attend or even the press it gets,” Venugopal said in an interview published in 2011. “It is judged by whether it was a popular success, whether it was a people’s festival.”

for more follow the link..

About these ads

56 Responses to “Godard’s Own Country, The IFFK and the oddities of Malayali cinephilia (Caravan)”

  1. Lovely article. thanks for the link. Who has put it up ?

    Every city/town/the Indian public badly need exposure to world cinema. There are so many cultures to appreciate and understand, beyond America mainstream. This year I finally roused myself into being part of Chennai’s 10th Intl FF; will surely be following up on this succulent world cinema diet. Sadly my Tata Sky provider has stopped showing UTV’s world cinema channel.

    Bangalore had its second IFF this year. I watched 9 films in the IFF week at Chennai, but my Bangalore friend watched 16! Tiring, but good fun for all of us.

    Have always known Kerala to be literature-cinema literate state. And it cuts across class lines. In Chennai too, I’ve seen some auto drivers fill up their spare time with some good reading.

  2. As per this review, would love to watch this Bengali film Maach Mishti and More. But I doubt if general non Bengali viewer could access such a film unless it was specifically part of a film fest, subtitles provided.

    What we need in India is a pan-Indian film channel, providing good cinema to interested viewers. We also need a good documentary channel.Mita Vashisht spoke about this need, a couple of years back.

  3. I am always curious where, how Satyam gets to watch all kinds of international cinema, a secret he doesn’t share. How is Farewell my queen? I would love to watch it.
    P.S. I wouldn’t like to buy movies just borrow, watch, return them….

    • It just released in the US. Available on netflix. On the rest in the age of the DVD it’s not hard at all to access all kinds of stuff. If one is in a major Western city one also has access to all kinds of films in theaters. It’s of course much harder in India unless one goes the online route. Now if one really wants to be comprehensive and follow the releases where they occur (on DVD) one has to follow stuff in Europe, Australia, East Asia as well. So you have lots of films that have released on DVD in one or more of these markets but not elsewhere. I was once very plugged into all of this. For a variety of reasons haven’t been able to keep up with all of this in the same way for a number of years.

      • I love the way you follow up say a Kurosawa film with Fire Fire (I am assuming you succumbed to Ms. Dawson’s charms or the Willis fan in you suddenly rose from ashes.This film was not even released in theatres). Talk abt varied tastes!

        • Ha, I have an enormous appetite for certain kinds of Hollywood junk! These days I’m onto some TV shows though. Caught up with White Collar recently. It’s fluff but entertaining.

          • that’s funny – i just got sucked into white collar too…total fluff, but has a terrific look to it and certainly pretty fun

          • could never get into white collar. my tv viewing is getting bloated with dexter, mad men, homeland and fringe (though that’s coming to an end). is scandal worth a watch?

          • yes it’s rather gripping.

          • ^Satyam -the <1 minute response time was amazing …haha
            As if from the same person with 2 usernames :-)

          • Yeah..there are essentially two people on this blog..Alex and Satyam (with his different usernames). He is afflicted with Schizophrenic neutrino splitting personality disorder.

      • “I was once very plugged into all of this. For a variety of reasons haven’t been able to keep up with all of this in the same way for a number of years.”
        You are a connoisseur of world cinema especially someone who doesn’t belong directly to world of cinema as an insider (correct?)..we learn a lot from your writings. Take good care of your health…smoke less…have more lemon water during the day…boosts immune system.
        I have love/hate relationship with netflix. When I have it, I get frustrated; when I don’t, I miss it. maybe sorta like being on SS!!
        @Saurabh: I started to watch intequam last nite based on one of your other comments and have seen may be quarter of the movie. I loved the comic scenes (MIB style) and MB sizzles…why can’t actors do more mainstream hero roles!!! gonna watch more today hopefully if all goes well. :-)

        • “You are a connoisseur of world cinema especially someone who doesn’t belong directly to world of cinema as an insider (correct?)..we learn a lot from your writings. Take good care of your health…smoke less…have more lemon water during the day…boosts immune system.’

          thanks much though you are wrong on almost all of these counts!

          • Thank god that you are not a smoker! The way you protect SRK on his smoking, I felt you might be one :-)
            So then you ARE an insider!! I wonder if you wrote any movie scripts (of movies I have seen) or if you are a movie critic or maybe PR rep of that hero whose name I cannot mention….
            ahhh…the secret life of Satyam….so elusive…so secretive…

          • Not an insider, not a smoker either..
            Not sure what I might have said about SRK’s smoking. Don’t remember but in any case I do believe that making pariahs out of smokers is going rather too far.

            My belief though is that insiders in any field very rarely get the big picture. They are usually about the nuts and bolts which they’ve mastered. They’re obviously street-smart within their fields. They know how to work the system they occupy for themselves or their interests. But all of this is very far from having genuine insight into what the field represents. You’re not very likely to find such ‘imagination’ within the industry (to follow your example) because people are too caught up with the limiting view of the world they occupy. It is very hard to be ‘in’ a profession but also then have a bird’s eye view. Which is why Aamir’s acumen in remarkable in this regard. What is often missed, and supremely so by many of his fans, is that though Aamir has a great sense of scripts and what works and so on but at the root of it there is a great humility on his part. In other words if he really thought about himself in the terms established by many of his fans he wouldn’t be half as successful. It is precisely because he does not think that he is this great star who can as it were bring the movie home despite flaws and warts that he achieves success so consistently. And it is very hard to get that sort of mind in any industry. People who know they are important stars but have a very realistic estimation of what that stardom entails. In Hollywood you have a lot more people with that kind of sense (for all the egos otherwise rampant in this industry!).

            But the classic and grandest example here is Obama’s. Here’s a guy with limited experience in politics who defeated some of the shrewdest players in the game to get to where he currently is. Why? Because he ‘analyzed’ things better than say the Clintons who were old hands at the game and too enframed by the nuts and bolts. They set up things perfectly for themselves but they didn’t contend with this sort of surprise. Which is understandable because you don’t get such a figure very often in any field. But the point is that the shrewdest insider can always be defeated by this kind of figure. The latter just requires a different kind of shrewdness. What happens is that when you hang around very long in a profession you lose that edge or imagination. Clinton himself had it when he ran in ’92 but he was too institutionalized by the time his wife started running and not able to account for someone like his past self!

            But all of this also applies to many of the discussion or debates we have on blogs. 99% of these are about the obvious. So it doesn’t take a genius to say that Salman’s doing fantastically but how many could see this before all of it happened? or how many now can see the end of the road with what he’s currently doing? Similarly with other stars the arguments are really about what ‘is’ never about what might be. Similarly even when someone succeeds or fails we read just the most obvious stuff into it. It’s a common human tendency of course. We just lack imagination most of the time.

          • Bachchan1 to 10 Says:

            Very well said Satyam sir, and Di I wonder the same things about Satyam sir very often.

            Also, You have really hit the note with Aamir’s script sense and what works. Aamir has on many occassions said that how he wish he can put on a backpack and tour India from North to South, he also recommends this to many of the upcoming stars (recently he suggested this to Ranbir Kapoor, but RK admitted that he kind of found it odd when advised, but regrets not doing so now).
            I Do agree with Aamir, if you want to get the pulse of the audience you have to travel to various parts of the country as their own. That would help tremendously in their future endavours and not just for cinema, also to understand its own nation.

          • “We just lack imagination most of the time.”
            Sattu don’t even ask me (and rest of the females) what our imagination about you is even!! ;-)
            We (the voters) used our imagination of what we wanted Obama to be and gave him the power and failed to really see what he really is! So it could be an argument used another way as well. On Aamir: my thoughts were exactly like yours..until..I saw him on that round table. Humility can be quite fake too. For instance I was quite moved by Jodie Foster’s speech. I get moved by bigb on KBC. I tend to forget that these are master magicians when it comes to acting. Same things happens in “inside actor’s studio”. Some of them are mavericks (see the one on Ben Kingsley). They spin such webs. Lord have merci. You could come out watching their speeches, interviews and never know how much of a ‘fool’ you were made out to be. The politicians too can be master actors and drama artist (Indira’s mere khoon kaa katra-katra speech, case to the point) though there is hidden agenda and their motives are questionable in case of politicians.
            The round table of aamir with rest of the actors: no matter who the question was thrown to, our Aamir HAD to answer it. So the humble act was gone and truer self prevailed (I am not aamir fan or hater like others on this blog). Though I personally think that Aamir is more cerebral, thinking actor, quite grounded and not ego maniac like many others in BW. However one can very easily have “god complex” in this profession. You can see that in SMJ possibly, though I am a huge fan of the show and think very positively that only good things can come out of such a show.
            On rest of the stuff about not being objective while in movie business is accurate and I quite agree with ya. It is a field unlike others and hard to be objective consumer of cinema while you are thick into it.

        • “maybe PR rep of that hero whose name I cannot mention….”- Is the hero Kamal Sadanah!”

          Harsha Bhogle once said this abt Dravid- “He is a good guy. He bats like a good guy”. While I do not claim to know Satyam personally (from little i have interacted with him). I am sure that one could replace the word ‘bats’ with ‘writes’ and it could be applied to Satyam.

    • Di – I watch a lot of movies, but Satyam’s watching volume is atleast 5 times more :) If I see an obscure movie, Most likely I can elicit some comments from Satyam.

      • Munna: we have children (at least the volume gets affected)
        All of us from SS should travel to attend IFFK…would be loads of fun!
        ;-) :-)

        • Spouses would kill Satyam; We waste (according to them) time on these blogs talking with strangers :)

          • Ha! They’re probably right!

          • “We waste (according to them) time on these blogs talking with strangers ”
            you hurt my feelings :-(

          • Bachchan1 to 10 Says:

            Agreed Di, Munna has hurt our feelings, we are no strangers, All friends here, Some have good days, some bad days, But at the end of the day, We learn something new each day from everyone of them and create a new wrinkle in our brains..

          • Di, Bachchan1to10 – Please read carefully :)

          • Munna badnam hua bibi kay jalim comment kay liyay. lol. Theek hai aab ki baar maaf kiya…kabhi kabhi mistake say galti ho jati hai. Do you watch Mad Men too Munna? I am a big fan too but for possibly different/wrong reasons than all the intellectuals :-)

          • Di – lol…No..With work, wife and Kid you keep looking for idle time.

      • “Most likely I can elicit some comments from Satyam.”

        Alas no longer true!

        By the way check this out if you’re in the mood for a period piece:

        http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/70208063?strkid=155474251_0_0&trkid=222336&movieid=70208063

        the 1967 version of this is one of the very fabled shows in BBC history. But it’s a bit stagey in many ways (as shows of that age often were). This new version is rather good and in terms of casting probably betters the older one.

        • Thanks. I will watch it. In TV miniseries, I see whatever wife wants to see. We follow Newsroom and Scandal. I have no appetite for Grey’s anatomy.

          • someone else recommended Newsroom recently but it’s not out on DVD. Hadn’t heard of Scandal. Will check it out. Another one I have my sights on is Revenge, supposed to be inspired from Count of Monte Cristo.

          • Looks like you have started watching Scandal…Just a warning, that I liked for most part but lately it seems they don’t have enough content.

            ps – I think it is available on Hulu.

          • it’s available on netflix streaming. Like it a lot. But they just have season 1.

            Even without enough ‘content’ Kerry Washington should make the deal acceptable!

        • What about downton abbey? NPR did a story on the latest season. I cannot wait to watch the lastest series with Shirley Maclaine…love her
          http://www.npr.org/2013/01/03/168539813/downton-returns-with-aristocratic-class-and-clash

          • Somehow this never quite did it for me. Admittedly I’ve only seen segments from each of the first two seasons and it’s certainly very well-mounted and all that but I’m rather tired of British period pieces. It’s another old industry. But again this could just be about me at this point in time. The show has been universally loved. To be honest I even approached the new Forsyte with some skepticism for the same reason but it was very well done.

            But Downton Abbey is part of the same imperial nostalgia that also visited the recent Bond film. The thing is that the Raj still has many fans (I am one too on certain days!) and the old colonial stuff still goes a long way. America has always been too ‘functional’ an empire in this sense. Doesn’t quite have the same aura to it for these reasons. Of course the irony is that everything that ones loves in shows like Downton Abbey represents a slice of life that would be rather unpleasant for just about everyone not belonging to those classes! The British high society from the last two centuries or so that is regularly peddled on the BBC and in various movies and for all its charms on screen was one of the most oppressive social structures around. Of course at this distance from it one can engage in the pleasure without the pain!

          • downton abbey is basically a period soap, a well-done one. loved the first season, kind of has lost its sheen now.
            your point about the fascination for these pieces is somewhat correct but there are reasons for their popularity. my love for bbc period dramas for example is rooted in love for english literature for instance since a lot of these were based on books to begin with; and bbc does these very well in terms of the craft involved

          • Re: “Of course at this distance from it one can engage in the pleasure without the pain!”

            That’s precisely it, and which is why the genre is so often lazy (the same goes for historical novels); not that one can’t have great work in these genres, but the artist really has to work harder to get there. Because the “staging of the past” (and even worse, a past where people always seem to be conscious of their historic status — i.e. “I’m not just M.K. Gandhi in 1897, I am the Mahatma-in-Waiting!” or “Look at me, I am The Legend You Know as Lincoln”) is such a large part of the works’s effect. A second lazy pleasure this genre promises the reader/viewer is that of smugness (Mad Men specializes in this): “Man these people were so damn sexist! How things have changed!” — all while we get to enjoy the titillating pleasure of precisely that misogyny represented on screen. In fact the pleasure is doubled, because we now get to consume it guilt-free, as it were.

            Aside: I am addicted to Mad Men

            Aside 2: I just read Sunil Gangopadhyay’s “Those Days” (English translation of his famous Bengali novel from the 1980s), and whatever one may say about the novel, it is free from this sort of laziness — not completely from the charge that many of the protagonists seem to think they inhabit momentous times (but it is free from the “staging of pastness”, i.e. characters conscious of the gaze of the present-day reader), but it certainly doesn’t peddle the lazy sepia-tinted glow of so many “period pieces”. I highly recommend it. Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall and Bring Up The Bodies were also fantastic for the same reason…

          • “Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall and Bring Up The Bodies were also fantastic for the same reason…”
            I have ordered those books from amazon! I have insatiable desire for anything to do with Queen Elizabeth-1
            I have watched all of Mantel’s interviews and think very highly of her even before reading any of her works.
            I have only watched season 1 of DA. There is a scene where Maggie Smith’s character says “what is a weekend”…it is hilarious. You should watch season 1. Maybe it is a soap like Tanya says but a good one.

          • Elizabeth barely makes an appearance in the two novels, but don’t let that dissuade you — they are both fantastic, and I can’t wait for the third one. I also recommend Gore Vidal’s historical novels, set in America; they are completely addictive.

          • I meant to say Henry the 8th and of course queen elizabeth 1sth his daughter, I find this period of british history most interesting. Have you seen “The Tudors”? It was bit masala but I still loved it all the same..what with JRM as Henry the 8th…we used to go on all sorts of forums and discuss and debate with each episode. The Borgia was another series (bit over the top) that was quite interesting…this is the most interesting and possibly wrong way to learn history but once the interst is piqued we can do our own research to find out the truth.
            Aside1: say hello to your big brother :-)

  4. Hi Satyam:

    Sorry this is OTT in this thread..

    Have you got chance to catch these Tamil movies of 2012:
    Vazhakku Enn 18/9 (Case Number 18/9),
    Pizza,
    Thadaiyara Thaakka,
    Neerparavai.

    You may have already visited these movies, as I was catching them late. I don’t know Tamil very well, but these movies were really good watch. Most of them are low-budget without any Big Stars, but good scripts, acting and direction ….I have feeling you may like Vazhakku Enn 18/9 and visuals of Neerparavai, if you have not watched them…(‘Pizza’ a Horror-Thriller movie is better than any Vikram-Bhatt kind of Horror movies. I belive it will be made in Hindi soon)

    • Haven’t seen any of these unfortunately. Have wanted to see Neerparavai for some time. Thanks much. Good to see you here after a while. Hope all is well at your end..

      • I see a DVD copy is available on youtube. will check it out (neelparavai) soon. Also found Thadiyara Thaakka.

      • Thanks a lot Satyam..I will never missout visiting this site everyday..Just that I don’t particpate or comment much..As Di mentioned above
        ..so much to learn just by reading your movie reviews and commentry..

  5. A writer recently said this about stars, though I not sure if he is totally correct in his assessment —

    There are three people in every Bollywood person—the star as he actually is, the star as he thinks he is, and the star as he wants you to think he is. These three selves could overlap but it is also possible that they exist independently.

    http://www.openthemagazine.com/category/author/madhavankutty-pillai?page=2

    @ Di –I am a self confessed Aamir fan/supporter and have followed him vide media thru a decade plus. I think the guy comes across as fairly sincere, in his attempts at whatever he does — make films or speak out at roundtable interviews. At Rajeev’s roundtable, aamir spoke only when asked, did not answer others’ questions and said all that he could , considering he’d grown up offering his two bits as a kid, while overhearing his producer dad discuss stories with film people. apparently he’d hunker in his sofa with a comic or whatever –and hear a lot; was asked for his kiddie opinion, gave it…he was just the most filmi-experienced in that Masand acror’s group. Let him be.

    • LS: I have respect for A.K. I don’t necessarily love him or hate him. We both saw the same show, roundtable, but had different impressions! I felt that Irrfan was ‘bigger’ or even biggest guy on that table but he was truly humble. SO was Nawaz (Nawaz I felt even had self-esteem issues; I felt that he could at least have ‘acted’ confident!!). One can think of oneself as humble and ‘act’ humble but at times the façade falls apart in little ways and maybe that’s what I saw in round table. He did indeed answer questions thrown out to the table when he could have kept quiet and he did this multiple times!! But I still think he is not ego-maniac or anything remotely like that. But certainly not humble! On the other hand I would say Bigb is truly humble. For satyam annoyingly so.

      • Sorry, IMO,NO way is Irfan bigger. Age-wise both Aamir and Irfan are at same level, but I think. Aamir has been in films since ages and Irfan has come into limelight much later. I ;like Irfan the actor very much, loved him in The Namesake…but Aamir is in no way inferior to Irfan. Yes, Irfan has had international success and I am happy for him, but why on earth make Irfan out to be the bigger guy? How unfair to Aamir–or anybody else like him; I would say the same if it was SRK in Aamir’s place. These star-actors have slogged their way to the limelight through 20 plus years; Aamir in fact officially completes 25 years this year as a lead. He has actually been around as a kid and later as a part of art films like Holi and Raakh, films made befor his commercial debut with QSQT in 1988.

        Nawaaz got his break with an Aamir film in 1999–Sarfarosh; he also got a role in another film Peepli live, then Talaash–and yet Nawaaz fans are ready to dismiss Aamir; how fair is that.

        Yes, these guys can act; good for them and may they have more success; but let’s not push them up and pull down vwterans like aamir, people who have proved theior acting chops through years.

        Aamir himself is the first to admit that every acting assignment is a fresh test for him; that he gets it sometimes, sometimes he is just competent. The man is honest; at least credit him that.

        The four chaps at RM’s roundtable–no one was inferior to the other. They were from different generations–and Aamir spoke confidently. Is that a crime?

        • At a recent discussion on Star Movies channel, live, on the evening Oscar noms were announced, Karan Johar had a lot to say — and seemed to hog the show; while actually he was just being his enthusiastic self. There is no video available, but here is pic put up on twitter.

          photo/1

    • Agree on Aamir in that roundtable. Felt completely sincere in my view.

      • “completely sincere”
        Thats what I meant by good acting. With good/gr8 actors you will never know…which one was act…what was the truth.
        But glad to know that Aamir fan base is increasing on SS.

        • The problem with Aamir’s interviews is that he is not very confident that other person has understood his point of view or not (though he is sincere); so he keeps on repeating the same thing in multiple ways. Sometimes I cringe but then I know his intentions are good.

          • cannot believe this is a point of discussion here, aamir’s breathing is also controversial these days. he truly has arrived!
            i thought it was a good, fun discussion. nobody seemed to be trying to hog anything, just a difference in personalities and how comfortable people are. some questions were asked to specific people and some were thrown out generally. at times, all of them had an answer and sometimes, only 1 or 2 of them answered. aamir seemed to be answering a few when nobody else would say anything. he actually kept the conversation going, was deliberate and specific in his answers (this seems to be a tendency) and was visibly enjoying himself. ranbir seemed casual and relaxed and participated a lot too. irrfan seemed less eager and vague with some of the answers but less so with others. and nawaz just seemed uncomfortable, he is probably shy and rarely sparkles in interviews. that’s not a criticism, just the way he is and that will probably change with more time in the limelight. ranbir has grown up in the industry and so has aamir and have spent more time being interviewed, it is natural that they are more comfortable with it, nawaz even admitted in response to a few questions that he is still trying to figure things out as the fame and opportunities are new to him. so he seemed to lay back and absorb things mostly. i don’t see any issue.

          • Antya – My comment was in general not for this roundtable meet.

          • oh, my comment was not directed at you, just this entire conversation in general. i was surprised by this being discussed so much.

  6. Man this is such a nice blog i wish to catch every comment, but how pathetic is look. This black bg is pain to eyes.
    Another thing i hate here is vertically merged comments. If there is a reply, those comments get squeezed in small given width.
    I can’t follow such good stuff :(
    Please do something about these issues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s