Qalandar Reviews Special 26 (Hindi; 2013)

Little in cinema is as enjoyable, as seductively charming, as a good caper film, centered around a dashing thief and con-artist the audience has no choice but to root for against the agents of the staid State trying to foil him, a harmless outlet for what Hannah Arendt once called the bourgeoisie’s fascination with criminality. And, on paper, Special 26, Neeraj Pandey’s film about a bunch of thieves who in the late-1980s impersonate one of India’s pre-eminent agencies, the Central Bureau of Investigation (“CBI”), conducting raids on, and looting, dozens of people with “black” money to hide (with the real CBI in hot pursuit), should have been that kind of film. It isn’t: despite a generally solid cast and a high-quality plot (Pandey himself wrote it), the film is seriously let down by a directorial style that isn’t nearly as nimble as this material needs it to be. In short, what Special 26 needed was elan; what Pandey offers is filmmaking that plods. That the film is nevertheless likely to end up as one of 2013′s better films is a depressing commentary on the state of the Hindi film industry.
First, to the positives: Manoj Bajpai is superb as Waseem Khan, the (almost unpleasantly) single-minded CBI officer assigned the task of putting an end to the fake CBI’s crime spree. Right from his diction to his slightly eccentric intonation to his comically furrowed brow, Bajpai hits all the right notes, never forgetting that if Special 26 isn’t a comedy, it’s setting is essentially comical, “inspired” by real-life incidents that border on the absurd (indeed, the “inspired by real-life incidents” line in the title credits plays an essential role in legitimating the plot; absent that stamp of approval, I suspect more than one reviewer would have dismissed the story as farcical). Bajpai’s Khan is thus no naturalistic CBI officer, but the sort of oddball official one might encounter in a novel, easily the most compelling of the film’s actors. It’s great to see him in fine form, although he’s lost so much weight he looks downright unwell here. Jimmy Shergill’s Ranvir Singh, playing a cop duped by the fake CBI; and Divya Dutta, playing his trusty sidekick, don’t have very much to do, but execute with reliable competence. (Indeed, given that most of Shergill’s recent roles — in Sahib, Biwi aur Gangster and Tanu Weds Manu, for instance — have tended to cast him as an irascible, authoritarian figure, I was pleasantly surprised to see him in a mellower, more bumbling incarnation.) Akshay Kumar’s is the starry turn, as the brain behind the con jobs pulled off by the fake CBI, and he makes his way through his part with solidity, if only sporadic flair (my favorite moment is the Calcutta sequence, when Akshay’s Ajay and company run into the real CBI while impersonating a team from the Income Tax Department; it takes all of Ajay’s Bengali to get out of the jam, and by film’s end found I myself wishing there had been more such sequences). And the film’s first “CBI” raid is gripping, even as it pays homage to a number of Hindi film cliches about corrupt politicians and the places they might hide their money in (behind the bookshelves? In an altar? Inside a car-seat? Check ‘em all!). All of these are enough to make Special 26 worth a watch, and I do think the nearly-full weekend cinema hall I watched it in testifies to the fact that the film could have real legs at the box office.
But the films that veer off course by virtue of only a few tricks missed are more frustrating than those that never could have aspired to much, and top of the list of let-downs has to be Pandey’s direction. Every twist and turn is flash-backed and explained to death, almost as if Pandey believed his audience were too dense for spoon-feeding to be eschewed. Special 26 could easily have survived poor casting choices like Anupam Kher as Ajay’s partner-in-crime (it isn’t that Kher is bad, as that he is stale; having shown us everything he could possibly do in so many films, he would need to be an actor of rare calibre to continue to seem fresh, or even engaged — and he isn’t), or Kajal Aggarwal as Ajay’s lover (confirming my impression that her irritating listlessness in Magadheera was no one-off). Moreover, Pandey’s style is repetitive and the film poorly edited: I lost count of the number of shots featuring groups of men marching towards the camera, or of the number of scenes that felt a couple of minutes too long; not to mention that with the exception of her last scene, every one of the heroine’s scenes and the songs interrupted the narrative, bogging it down in terrain that didn’t seem natural to Special 26. Finally, no low budget can excuse backdrops of Marine Drive and Calcutta’s Howrah Bridge so fake I found myself wondering if I was dealing with a spoof. I wasn’t: just a film with a solid writer and an over-matched director. Even if the two happen to be the same person.
February 9, 2013 at 2:23 PM
There are many incidents of con artists impersonating CBI, Incometax, police and harassing gullible citizens not necessarily black monied. Some of the lower level officials indulge in this as part time moneymaking spree.
February 9, 2013 at 2:25 PM
Superb note Qalandar. I must confess that in terms of the directorial choices you criticize I had this hunch watching the first preview. It didn’t quite give off the Wednesday vibe in this sense. Nonetheless do want to check it out and would have if it were playing nearby. Admittedly I’m not willing to make a great effort for it.
February 9, 2013 at 2:35 PM
I haven’t seen the trailers yet, so can’t really say much, but A Wednesday happens to be one of my favorite films. It was so politically incorrect, I was surprised it actually released without any issues.
February 10, 2013 at 12:05 AM
Saket: I don’t think A Wednesday was all that politically incorrect; in fact, I think it tapped into a certain urban, middle-class mood (of vigilantism, disgust with/despair of institutions, flirtation with authoritarianism) quite effectively. I think I appreciated the fact that Pandey tried to “de-politicize” this mood (making his protagonist a man with no name) but I would consider the film more prescient (given all the “movements” of recent years in urban India) than politicially incorrect…
February 9, 2013 at 2:28 PM
Nice read, Qalandar…although it’s hard for me to say if I might have the same reaction as yours, given that quite a few films that you seem to have liked (Bluffmaster, DMD ) I wasn’t really impressed with. And it works in the opposite direction as well — I quite liked Barfi and find Gangs of Wasseypur to be a masterpiece…and continue to revere Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron
Oh well, at least we agree on our choice of actors!
February 9, 2013 at 2:29 PM
“Oh well, at least we agree on our choice of actors!”
that might not be entirely true either because he’s a huge fan of Jr!
February 9, 2013 at 2:32 PM
It still might be true, because I mentioned the term “actor”
Jokes aside, I’m not a complete naysayer on Abhishek. I still don’t discount his performances in certain roles.
February 9, 2013 at 4:16 PM
“It still might be true, because I mentioned the term “actor”
’
Touche!
February 10, 2013 at 12:08 AM
This might come across as condescending (I honestly don’t mean it like that), but I’d urge you to re-visit films like Bluffmaster! and Dum Maaro Dum (and perhaps Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron!); especially with respect to the first on the list, in conjunction with other con/twist films from the industry… even leaving aside my own weakness for Rohan Sippy’s work in his last two films, these are very well-directed, well-made films.
February 9, 2013 at 3:25 PM
Great note,Q. A little disappointed to see that someone who gave us A Wednesday seems to falter in his second outing.
February 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM
Thanks Rajen — I still think it’s fun enough to be worth checking out, just that this film could have been really really good in the hands of someone else…
February 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM
Qalandar, a good and refreshing take. You didn’t write anything on Talaash despite declaring it to be the best movie of 2012. Come on, we need some hidden insights from you which only you could have deciphered, so give us a treat in form of a piece on Talaash. Waiting with hope that you would relent!
February 10, 2013 at 12:01 AM
Guilty as charged! I’ve had a bit of writer’s block in general, but I do feel there is a piece on Talaash in my future!
February 9, 2013 at 6:02 PM
Some Akki fans might not like this, but I think he’s the weak link in this film. He’s just out of his league, when one considers the excellent supporting cast surrounding him.
February 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM
No .. Akki has done great job. Only problem I found was romantic track .. not only becz it was pace breaker but also becz Akki is ageing and his romance with young actress doesn’t looks good any more.
February 10, 2013 at 12:09 AM
Yakuza: I do agree that whole track was a problem. On the age issue, I think it is more of an issue in this sort of film than in Rowdy Rathore — in the world of the latter, that doesn’t matter, or at least not in the same way…
February 9, 2013 at 7:35 PM
Just watched Special Chabbis. Absolutely loved it. Agar sau taka desi heist movie ho, to aisi. Akshay, Bajpai, Akki..all were good but my most fav in the movie is Anupam Kher. The jokes/humor had the whole theater full of people laughing. Its a hit! The only weak link, if any, would be all that romance stuff–song-dance. We also liked the BGM a lot.
February 9, 2013 at 9:32 PM
The way some are going gaga over this film is for other reasons. They find Akki to challenge the Khans, especially Aamir Khan. They think that with this one film Akki has become prestige hero. Haha.
February 9, 2013 at 9:33 PM
If Aamir had done this movie, all these trolls would have found so many loopholes.
February 10, 2013 at 8:27 AM
“The way some are going gaga over this film is for other reasons. They find Akki to challenge the Khans, especially Aamir Khan. They think that with this one film Akki has become prestige hero. Haha.”
but the Irony is Aamir who is known for such movies was able to just make 90 cr from Talaash(that to after 3 years of Waiting) while Akshay who had just tried this Genre will be able to Make Special26 above 100 cr….
that’s the difference
February 10, 2013 at 9:38 AM
Special Chabbis is struggling against a no star movie ABCD. Thats the power of akshay Kumar.
February 10, 2013 at 9:42 AM
And ABCD is being treated like a stepchild on all the forums and critics, yet able to making its mark.
Forget Aamir Khan, Akshay has to contend with Saif and Prabhudeva.
February 10, 2013 at 9:39 AM
Dude, do you think Talaash and Spl. 26 belong to the same genre!
February 10, 2013 at 8:23 AM
one question to Qalandar as someone pointed out u consider Talaash to be the best movie of 2012…..
did u saw some loop holes in Talaash ??
even after knowing the loop holes if u still consider it to be best of 2012 ??
then after watching both i can easily say S26 is best movie of in the last 2 years..!!
February 10, 2013 at 9:48 AM
As much as I liked Spl. 26 (which I preferred to the heavily derivative BM), Talaash is by far the better film. But even leaving that aside from last year itself I will easily take Chittagong, PST, Kahaani, GoW-1, AV over Spl. 26
February 10, 2013 at 1:37 PM
Which film is “AV”?
February 10, 2013 at 1:42 PM
Agent Vinod
February 10, 2013 at 1:47 PM
Sheeeeeet, I was hoping there was a porno I’d missed out on.
February 10, 2013 at 1:57 PM
Aside: Saurabh, I recently caught up on some Daredevils (I’d been out of the loop for the last 10-12 years), by way of a few trade paperbacks covering the Brian Michael Bendis/Alex Maleev run on the comic book. Although I probably didn’t like it as much as the hype, it was very impressive and very ambitious, and I was pleased that the whole plot focusing on the revelation of Daredevil’s secret identity was dealt with so thoroughly, rather than in a “costless” 5-6 issue story arc — I can’t wait to check out what the next writer, Ed Brubaker, did with this character. Honestly, ever since Miller over three decades ago, it is hard to think of another major character who has been as consistently well-served by writers as Daredevil has been…
February 10, 2013 at 9:58 AM
‘LESSONS’ from recent film results
I think there have been some ‘significant’ film verdicts lately–i dont care if anyone shares the same thoughts but here they are –
On manis kadal debacle
https://satyamshot.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/sandys-take-on-conversations-with-mani-ratnam-by-baradwaj-rangan/#comment-209604
On OMG and now special26
well, havent seen special26 and didnt like OMG
but the audience verdict has to be RESPECTED
they are not bl..dy cattle but the paying public who m,ake this entuire facade go around not those typing awa on blogs like us!
Akshay & the only-aamir vibe
Also deserving credit is poor akshay kumar
he may not be aamir khan in terms of acting
but this has certainly DENTED the premise of ONLY AAMIR as the shrewd mind
akshay was the LAST person to attempt/achieve this
AND these are EARLY days but STILL
he has shown the way–its not THAT difficult!
Abhishrek-ajay debate
Have sense an underlying theme here and wished to make my point clear
Thnings may change in the future, but on current evidence, Ajay devguns career and achievements critically . commercially and on acting skills > Abhishrek
The latter benefits from his transcendental dad/surname but lets NOT get carried away
The DAY devgun achieved 100 crores AGAINST SRK/yashrajs JTHJ releasing the same day–one CANNOT ignore/deny ajay devgun his space under the sun–Abhsihrek has to go some way before being propped up there
as i said earlier–abhisjreks biggest achievement till date remains his being able to get married to ash (even thats a different topic of discussion as to his exact role and things need to be checked wiht salmans about ash though) !
February 10, 2013 at 10:10 AM
Every dog has his day. Some dogs taste it early, some taste it late and some taste it never.
If Salman Khan can achieve stupendous success, why not others like Akshay and Ajay? Though comparing Ajay with Akshay will be sin.
As for Kadal, it is not sharemarket but it is creativity. Sometimes creativity appeals and sometimes not. For people like Mani, movies are not only commerce but something more than that.
February 10, 2013 at 10:14 AM
“Though comparing Ajay with Akshay will be sin”
haha sanju
btw talking of ‘sins’ –they are meant to be committed
ok, lemme start–and compare the two
Commercially Akshay> Ajay
Looks/dancing skills/ star appeal Akshay>Ajay
Acting Ajay>Akshay
However with all those disadvanatges interms of looks and conventional appeal, the fact that ajay has survived so long , deserves more credit
ok sanju—ready for another ‘sin’–cmon
February 10, 2013 at 11:49 AM
Ajay proved himself and now he is in for some fun movies like Himmatwala. I think Ajay’s looks give him that uniqueness different from all those with traditional goodlooks and infact he is quite charming with his shy smile.
February 10, 2013 at 11:54 AM
hmm sanju–so u have an ajay fetish
dont worry–can get an ajay ‘mask’ while…
February 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM
psst sanju—talking of ‘sins’ do u also wanna become a member of my H….(i know theres high demand but do open it from time to time)
There are already some members from here (u know them)–ive allowed them internet access briefly –but they insist at being ‘focussed/ dedicated’ on the job @ hand
February 10, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Great review! I tend to agree with you on most parts, but have one complaint, that you should have been a little more harsh on the female lead- Miss Agarwal, with her diction( you almost felt tortured to sit through her scenes), screen presence, dance moves, were impossible to bear. It left one to wonder why was she even there in the film, if she defeats all the above purposes for which she must have been signed.
It reaffirms the fact that one can really and easily f-up a solid cast and good script by just being a lazy and mediocre director. Neeraj Pandey needs to pull his acts together in the next film, because I don’t think he can go much further just riding on the success of A Wednesday.
February 10, 2013 at 2:05 PM
Thanks Agyaat — ha ha, based on the comments I’ve been reading on this blog, it’s a rare commenter who takes me to task for not being less kind to the film! Kidding aside, you are completely right: Kaajal Aggarwal was so bad she jars the viewer in every scene she was in. I think she was worse here than in Devgan’s Singham.
February 10, 2013 at 6:10 PM
Qalandar- I quite agree with your review. The film is a winner for everyone except Neeraj Pandey. Editing this by 45 minutes, could have made this twice as good. The same background score and shot implementation that mighty impressed in the opening scene, became redundant later to a point of “chalo bhi, ab aage ka scene dikhao yaar”.
Performances wise- Akshay and Manoj were fantastic.
February 11, 2013 at 2:46 AM
Donated my 11$ to the Akshay-Neeraj fund tonite.
Definitely not as I expected. Agree with Qalandar on the points regarding direction/editing but disagree with his rating of performances; I felt the exact reverse – Kher was terrific while an emaciated and furrowed Bajpayee (Waseem) protecting the common man and also his wife’s ample bosom ok – no great shakes here. Kher was terrific for the very points Q doesn’t like. He plays a tired old man who has nothing better to do but loot and have sex with his wife because he didn’t have a TV and keep producing children as though he were growing tomatoes in his garden. He is superb in his interrogation scene with Bajpayee. His voice when he talks in that scene is almost like a child whimpering..he gives a terrific performance as the man who has this weakness for the double-edged sword of illegitimate money and legitimate family bondings. Shergill, the criminally under-rated actor in Hi fi, is in fine form. Rajesh Sharma is good while Kishore Kadam as the submissive hubby is stoically hilarious. The heroine is a mess and she is the most unMaharashtrian woman to have walked the face of any film-set while trying to play a middle-class Marathi speaking Maharashtrian.
After the first raid, the film drags on till the start of preparations for the final raid. It is the final one hour that kept me on the edge; and some ‘improvisations’ in the middle like the Calcutta raid and the fake interviews (the interviews are a hoot..how good we Indians are at raping the ‘prepositions’ in the English language can be learnt here). And for someone having a lifetime of fond memories of Bombay, the MARINE DRIVE sets were truly insulting. The Marine Drive of late ’80s is almost the same as it is today except for the population. I wonder what prompted the director to build such an atrocious set. He could have just shot the scene there since all the time the camera was only facing the sea!! Even a kinder-garten drama set looks better compared to this. On the other hand, the shots of CONNAUGHT PLACE are well done.
The ‘Punjabization’ syndrome kicks in here as well..although it can be said that Anupam Kher was a Punjabi. Maybe he was made a Punjabi conveniently so that a ridiculous song-and-dance sequence could be shoved in. There was NO scope in this movie for ANY sort of song and dance. But kudos to the commercial constraints of the director/producer/studio that he has had to shove in songs and a romantic track in this movie which amount to NOTHING..absolutely NOTHING..So this heroine comes across as the dumbest creature on this Earth; she is madly in love with Akshay though she knows very well that he is a fraudster of the first degree. And who knows, maybe she took the ‘stupidity’ of her character to heart and hence acted miserably in the film!
Editing is sloppy; BGM is good; cinematography is average – except for one superb swooping aerial shot of Delhi’s Connaught Place. Bajpayee’s introduction scene was horrific. There was NO need to shove down our throat his ‘integrity’ and his ‘sher-dillagi’, so to say. He is more than competent actor who doesn’t need such hammering down. He could have easily brought out his no-nonsense character traits quite easily on his own without the crutch of his introductory ‘hero-giri’.
Akshay is very good but comes across as stiff in some scenes. He looks good in those ’80s t-shirts (which we as lower middle-class folks would cling onto with reverence; a far cry from present times’ NIKE/ADIDAS/CALVIN KLEIN collections) and Safari suit. Whether Abhishek would have done a better job than Akshay is a matter of conjecture but this definitely is NOT an outstanding performance as it is being made out to be. He is definitely good..but that’s it.
The disappointment for me is manifold because I was expecting a real smart-ass film in this one. Maybe superior flicks like CATCH ME IF YOU CAN have spoilt my taste-bud. This is not a patch on Spielberg’s master-con act. Still, you can catch this flick – the degree to which you can be elated or disappointed will only be proportional to what you expected..So I can in no way recommend or dissuade one from this movie. So the best judge of this movie is only you..and I don’t think any review for this movie can be in black or white category..there is hell a lot of gray here..
February 11, 2013 at 3:11 AM
Insightful note AnJo — I cracked up at yours and agyaat’s take on the heroine (she made for a better Maharashtrian in Singham!)…
February 11, 2013 at 4:14 AM
And there are bunch of holes. But if you don’t expect great things, it is entertaining.
February 11, 2013 at 4:51 AM
Has anyone seen Mama? Too scary?
February 11, 2013 at 5:47 PM
@ann jo– thanx for this enjoyable take on this film that I won’t see
But sometimes the pieces are more worth it
Like–
“Bajpayee (Waseem) protecting the common man and also his wife’s ample bosom ok ” –Haha
I always knew u had a certain fixation on that (like most of us)
Though apparently I’m getting less fixated on that now (though u never know how long for )
And your sense of humour vindicates why I cast u as Ann jo kapoor in race2
Besides –the other reason was so u can ‘interact’ with ample Ameesha
Oops –bak2work…
February 14, 2013 at 6:46 PM
Spectacular review as always Q…read it a few times now…thanks.
February 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM
Good. There is a quiz on it tomorrow.
February 14, 2013 at 8:16 PM
lol
February 15, 2013 at 3:21 AM
Thanks!
February 16, 2013 at 5:41 AM
“As much as I liked Spl. 26 (which I preferred to the heavily derivative BM), Talaash is by far the better film. But even leaving that aside from last year itself I will easily take Chittagong, PST, Kahaani, GoW-1, AV over Spl. 26″
u liked AV???
then u might have also like Dhobi Ghat i suppose??
sorry i can’t say much about ur likings so its better not to argue with u..!!
February 16, 2013 at 5:47 AM
I loved Dhobi Ghat. Thought it was the best film of that year alongwith DMD
March 26, 2013 at 1:13 PM
Read this note again. Probably enjoyed the film more than you did but I do agree with the overall criticism. I think Neeraj Pandey here settled for a caper film that is only middling cinema. You don’t quite see the more superior craftsman of A Wednesday in evidence here. It is narratively close to the rather campy thrillers they made in the late 60s to early (or even mid) 70s. This is a plus in my book. However Pandey could have been much more ambitious here. And so it comes down to a very enjoyable film that is content with being just that even though there are many cues here screaming out for more attention. And unlike those older 70s works it clearly isn’t a B movie effort in any sense to be wholly satisfying on just these grounds.
I too liked Bajpai a lot here and after a long time. Akshay was fine as well. The film though could have been better on the casting elsewhere. Shergill was adequate but the rest of the supporting cast didn’t make enough of an impression. Even Kher was bland (not that I’ve ever been a great fan of his.. barring Dr Dang! or perhaps his very early Misaal).
I will say this again and it’s just a hunch but I just think this film became a very different sort of project once Abhishek exited it. They thought about Devgan for a while, then he too didn’t do it. Naseer was once on board. Eventually when they got Akshay they probably decided to make a much more accessible film and they certainly achieved that objective but it’s a work where even as one remains interested throughout one also keeps waiting for it to be elevated to another level.
Finally I also agree that ‘explaining’ stuff might have been better handled.
Having said all this is there were 10 movies like Special 26 out of Bombay every year I’d be celebrating!