Mick Jagger teams up with Rahman and sings in Sanskrit!

LINK

Rolling Stones front man Mick Jagger has sung in Sanskrit on a new album by a supergroup, which stars Oscar-winning Indian musician AR Rahman. Jagger sings Satyameva Jayate (Truth alone triumphs), the second single from a supergroup called SuperHeavy which also features Dave Stewart, Joss Stone and Damian Marley. Satyameva Jayate is the band’s second single. SuperHeavy’s album is expected to be released in September.

“Dave said AR [Rahman] we want your voice in this album… we want this to be a great Indian song too. A long dream for me to raise one of the morals of Indian culture which is Satyameva Jayate and make it as a song,” Rahman was quoted as saying by the Press Trust of India.

“This is historic… it is iconic in a way. I hope people will like it,” he said.

Jagger formed the band in May, saying that he “wanted a convergence of different musical styles”.

“It’s different from anything else I’ve ever been involved in,” Jagger told Rolling Stone magazine .

“The music is very wide-ranging – from reggae to ballads to Indian songs in Urdu.”

10 Responses to “Mick Jagger teams up with Rahman and sings in Sanskrit!”

  1. alex adams Says:

    “The music is very wide-ranging – from reggae to ballads to Indian songs in Urdu.”—will be interesting

    Though im quite confident that mick jagger is a spent force now.
    How things change—-Rahman apparently adding weight to a rollingstone-Jagger album

    Shows anything is achievable—and illustrative of the peaks rahman has achieved!!

    Also is pertinent how in rahmans case (which is not common), faith/religion has helped his focus/creativity ie he has used it correctly

    Like

  2. alex adams Says:

    just heard it–nice sound!!
    This sort of “cross continent composing” sometimes doesnt work inspite of superlative talent—-but here it seems to have worked!!
    btw caught even some Bob markey influence
    Hope this undoubtedly iconic collaboration lives up to its biling
    Anyhow—ive started jamming (learning music as a hobby)

    The ‘Superheavy’ tracklisting is:

    ‘Superheavy’
    ‘Unbelievable’
    ‘Miracle Worker’

    ‘Energy’
    ‘Satyameva Jayathe’
    ‘One Day One Night’
    ‘Never Gonna Change’
    ‘Beautiful People’
    ‘Rock Me Gently’
    ‘I Can’t Take It No More’
    ‘I Don’t Mind’
    ‘World Keeps Turning’

    Bonus tracks:
    ‘Mihaya’
    ‘Warring People’
    ‘Common Ground’
    ‘Hey Captain’

    Like

  3. Alex adams Says:

    Another rAhman one I like—

    Sent from my iPhone

    Like

  4. Alex adams Says:

    Thanx.
    It’s a pity that this best song of raavan and
    Perhaps one of his recent best IMO did not even find a place inthe actual movie—mani just ignored it!!!

    Like

  5. alex adams Says:

    “just for the end credits”—using such a song only for the end credits is error of judgment imo…
    The song listing /cd did not contain this song.
    Although the fact that Rahman was late in getting this song ready …
    There was a hurriedly arranged “music release” where rahman and gulzar “released” this song—but was too late..
    If one takes this song away (barring Beera and Behne de) this was perhaps the weakest Mani-Rahman collaboration (close competition –Guru)
    Anyhow, dont think this song would have affected the music sales or box office in a day n age when the Shielas and Munnis are the “real” chartbusters.

    Having said that, the use of such a song in the end credits reminds me of another rahman masterpiece “rehna tu” in D6 —the song was massacred by rakesh mehra by picturising it casually on an obese Rishi Kapoor playing pool!!

    Like

  6. alex adams Says:

    Unrelated—
    The question in my mind—“Will tree of life win the Oscar this year?”
    The Answer I want if “Yes”!

    With “The Tree of Life” winning the Palme d’Or in Cannes today, Oscar talk has already swelled on Twitter (after whispered considerations in the wake of the premiere last week). I’ll be writing about the film again next weekend, when some of you will be able to take a look, but for now, I thought I’d speak on this.

    As we mentioned in the podcast Friday, I think Searchlight picking this demanding film up was an admirable move. It’s relationship-building with an important filmmaker (who has another film on the way, mind you). And its best chance at bringing in money was a counter-programming maneuver in the summer.

    But I don’t think this was ever considered a major awards threat, to be honest. I can’t imagine anyone watching it and expecting Academy types to embrace it. And I don’t think today’s unexpected award (Guy was hearing the only major fan of the film on the jury was Olivier Assayas) changes things.

    The Palme means very little for Oscars. The last winner of the award to get a major breeze in its sails was Roman Polanski’s “The Pianist,” which was already a soft Academy lob. Foreign winners have generated steam for nominations in the Best Foreign Language Film category, but that’s about it, with everything from “Elephant” to “The Wind That Shakes the Barley” failing to translate this niche attention to commendation from a broader group like the Academy. There are possibilities, however.

    First and foremost is Emmanuel Lubezki’s lush, naturally-lit cinematography. It has to be a given with that branch, though not likely a huge threat to win (depending).

    Next is Brad Pitt’s performance. This could prove to be an unnecessary conundrum and I hope Searchlight wises up and plays the right card from the beginning. Hunter McCracken is the true lead of the field. The story is his, and even with multiple narrators, it’s largely from his perspective. What Pitt does is deliver a robust, powerhouse supporting performance.

    Everything is reactionary to it. We don’t get inside his head until a brief interlude late in the game, but beyond all that, there is a real chance to get him some notice in the supporting field, and therefore, bring some more real attention to the film itself. Campaigning him as a lead — especially with “Moneyball” still to come — would be a mistake, in my opinion.

    Finally, given the expanded field last year, I think the visual effects could find some love from that branch. I can see the sequences blowing away a lot of frivolous, fakey effects work when the seven finalists have their screening event later in the season. But it could go either way.

    I don’t expect much outside of that. It would be great to see an intrepid directors branch spring for Terrence Malick. It would be lovely if the film found enough focused support from the Academy at large to nail down one of the 10 Best Picture slots. And it would be even more delightful if the sound engineers sparked to the impressive mixing and editing on display, particularly in that effects sequence. But I’m extremely doubtful.

    As for Best Original Score, I think Alexandre Desplat (who himself was saying early on not to expect huge things from his work in the film) will be disqualified. The original material is great, but it was snipped up and used as Malick saw fit, while classical music takes up most of the soundtrack and will potentially be seen as diluting Desplat’s contribution.

    So my takeaway on the film’s Oscar prospects: Best Supporting Actor, Best Cinematography and Best Visual Effects. And I think that would be more than anyone would expect a film like this to receive, so I’d personally see it as a win.

    Let’s see where things go from here. There’s a very long road ahead. Time will tell if “The Tree of Life” soon joins the ranks of “The Pianist,” “Secrets & Lies,” “Pulp Fiction,” “The Piano,” “The Mission,” “Missing,” “All That Jazz,” “Apocalypse Now,” “Taxi Driver,” “The Conversation,” “MASH,” “Marty” (the only film to win both the Palme and Best Picture) and “Friendly Persuasion.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.