Prakash Jha’s Rajneeti (updated)










































thanks to Kassam for the latest stills..



thanks to Rooney..



LINK

Ranbir Kapoor plays an NRI forced to return home to take over the family business(in this case, politics). Sounds familiar? Abhishek Bachchan played a similar role in Ram Gopal Varma’s Sarkar.

And both characters are inspired by Al Pacino’s Don Corleone in Francis Coppla’s The Godfather. Ranbir of course plays a mixture of Rajiv Gandhi and Don Corleone in Rajneeti.

And as coincidence would have it both Abhishek and Ranbir had Katrina as their co-star, but with a difference. In Sarkar Katrina’s anglicized voice had to be dubbed although she played an NRI and could’ve easily used her accented voice for the character. In Rajneeti Katrina gives long speeches in shudh Hindi all in her own voice.

Katrina Kaif’s two-minute speech in front of a 10,000-strong attentive public at a public rally in Bhopal for Rajneeti, has whetted Ranbir Kapoor’s appetite for getting right the speeches that need he needs to deliver for Prakash Jha’s film when he starts shooting in August.

There’s just one hitch. Ranbir doesn’t need to learn shuddh hindi, like Katrina did. He already knows that. He needs to cultivate an accent to sound like an America-returned Delhi boy who suddenly needs to go from monosyllabic rashtra bhasha to full-speeches.

Prakash Jha has planned intense reading and speech therapy sessions for Ranbir for him to get the accented Hindustani right.

To play a Harvard –educated US-based NRI who must suddenly return home to look after his mother’s political empire Ranbir Kapoor ina role that Al Pacino would have liked to play, is not just all set to start shooting, he’s raring to go.

Ranbir won’t play the reluctant politician in the usual khadi kurta-pyjama dress code. “Ranbir will be very trendily dressed. He plays a young man of today,” informs the director.

Apparently the character is a mix of Rajiv Ganghi and Michael Corloene from Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather.

Ranbir who joins the cast in August has been regularly calling and talking to the the entire cast in Bhopal.

Says Prakash affectionately, “He even offered to leave whatever he was doing and join us in Bhopal although his shooting starts next month. I remember one day Ajay, Nana, Arjun, Manoj were working together and missing Ranbir. So in the evening we got together in my hotel room and called him. Ranbir spoke to each of us individually. He wanted to leave everything in Mumbai and join us Bhopal.”

Prakash starts workshops with Ranbir after the Lok Sabha elections.

Says Prakash, “Ranbir is so excited about his look, dialogues. He needs to play a character who defines democracy in today’s world. I wouldn’t describe it as a multi-starrer. It’s a multi-actor film.Katrina Kaif is such a revelation. She was so nervous giving a speech in front of 10,000 people. After she gave her speech I hugged her on stage and shouted out to the junta, ‘Bhopal ka ticket de de kya?’ As for Naseer if I hadn’t worked with him I wouldn’t have been a complete filmmaker.”

200 Responses to “Prakash Jha’s Rajneeti (updated)”

  1. I am quite confident this will be a mediocre film; it might be engaging, but will offer nothing but the re-cycled usual stuff about politics. Perhaps the only consolation is that it Jha is a better director than Bhandarkar, and hence this has to be a better film than Satta.

    I saw Apharan for the first time recently — I quite liked it, it had good atmosphere, although Jha isn’t well suited to filming song videos…

    Like

  2. It might be a rehash of other political movies. I hope not. I’m interested in seeing if Ranbir will be able to convincingly pull off this type of role. I have zero expectations for Katrina Kaif. I’m not sure why she was cast other than for box office reasons.

    Like

  3. masterpraz Says:

    Q: I beg to differ, I think Jhaq with MRITYUDAND, GANGAJAL and APAHARAN has proved himself as more than a capable film maker on this topic. The cast here is absolute powerhouse and this could truly be the biggest of Jha’s films.
    As for APAHARAN, loved this movie, so much masala here, and parts of the movie actually reminded me of the 70’s Bachchan era…

    Like

  4. I haven’t seen Gangajal, although I’ve borrowed the DVD from satyam so hopefully will get to it soon. Mrityudand was ok, nothing great IMO — the film wasn’t as good as Madhuri’s hardhitting performance, which did make an impact…

    Like

    • masterpraz Says:

      Cool..this is gonna be a biggie….

      Like

    • Mukesh Pandey Says:

      I can only say that the combination of Jha and Ajay is deadly……
      While full marks to Jha for making and full marks to Ajay for acting through the eye nobody can do this as good as he is. Well done prakash after watching Mrityudand, Gangajal and aparahan i am eagerly waiting for ”RAJNITI” and i request you make movie as much as you cannnnnnn

      Like

      • absolutely….Some moments in Gangajall and Apaharan are gold…eagerly waiting for Rajneeti…Especially with the kind of cast present there in the movie…

        Like

  5. WTH – Rajneeti has been changed to Raajneeti. Is this supposed to bring good luck? Did Ajay Devgn convince Jha to use his missing ‘a’? LOL

    The posters all have this new spelling.

    Like

  6. Prakash Jha finishes Rajneeti’s shoot

    Filmmaker Prakash Jha has completed the shooting of his next film Rajneeti, a multistarrer in which Bollywood beauty Katrina Kaif will be seen the avatar of a politician.

    Jha told reporters that Rajneeti will release on May 28 next year.” The film has been produced and directed by him and presented by UTV Motion Pictures and Walkwater Media Limited.

    Ajay Devgn, Nana Patekar, Naseeruddin Shah, Katrina Kaif, Arjun Rampal, Manoj Bajpai and Ranbir Kapoor are part of the cast.

    “The shooting of ‘Rajneeti’ is complete. It was shot over two schedules, one in February-March 2009 and the other in September-October 2009. The film, shot completely in Bhopal was completed a day before the planned schedule,” Jha said crediting it to his cast and crew describing them as high calibre and dedicated.

    He said the film is now in post production stage.

    Like

  7. masterpraz Says:

    Power-house cast here….Nasser, Nana, Ajay, Manoj, Ranbir, Arjun…..

    Like

  8. In Newyork, she was good. In APKGK, Katrina was just rolling her eyes to show it as acting.

    Like

  9. masterpraz Says:

    Does Ranbir have a negative role here?>

    Like

    • From what I’ve heard, Ranbir’s character has grey shades. Not sure if he’s an outright villain though.

      They’ve finally revealed Naseer…my source had mentioned that it had Naseer, Mohan Agashe and Om Puri in bit parts. Well seems like Naseer has more than a bit part…or maybe they’re using him in the promotion to pump up the star wattage.

      This film is having me interested a fair deal. As it stands then, Ravana in April, this in May…and Kites hopefully (?) in June.

      Like

      • Is Ravana in April? Abhishek’s been talking about a summer release.

        Like

        • Ravana was always going to be 14th or 21st of May. This I had it from a sure source at Big Pictures. But then the whole Kites fiasco began with Big Pictures and Filmkraft going loggerheads over it. Do not believe a word of what the media suggests…Big Pictures is very unhappy with Kites and if Filmkraft doesn’t tidy its mess soon, Big will relinquish the project.

          Anyway, since Kites has been affecting their schedules…the other line-ups might get shifted here or there. For eg. Mirch that was supposed to release in April might be pushed earlier and so can Ravana. Big Pictures would ideally like a release in the latter half of the IPL phase…and they’d spaced everything out accordingly…but Kites has just mo-fo’d everything.

          So Ravana was 14th or 21st May…but it might, might (?) release in the last week of April as well.

          Like

        • Did know about many of the tensions on Kites and the conflicts all round. If Ravana gets released earlier I’d be even happier! I think though that the Tamil version was also delaying the Hindi version a bit inasmuch as they wrapped up on this after the Hindi. And in terms of release dates certainly they have to consider the best one on both counts.

          Like

        • Btw Satyam…ever paid any close attention to the title of SRK’s sci-fi flick with Anubhav Sinha? Ra-1, reads as ra-one; which phonetically is ‘ravan’! Wonder if its about an evil robot that has 10 manifestations?

          Like

        • yes I have indeed noticed that! Your idea is suggestive. Personally I don;t know what the heck SRK is doing with this project. You need a Shankar to pull off this sort of stuff! And you need to be either Hrithik or Rajni to be convincing at it.

          Like

        • I read that the title was indeed supposed to be “Ravan”, but, since that was taken by the Mani Ratnam film, they changed to something that would sound like Ravan even though not spelled like it, hence Ra-1.

          Like

        • The Title RA-1 has nothing to do with Ravan…It means Randon access-1 which is based on a “”game””..It was clarified by SRK on twitter..Although the name RA-1 itself in isolation sucks big time…

          Like

  10. sarvanash Says:

    “this could be a career best…”

    haha praz…that’s not saying much for katrina.

    this movie should be decent…devgan and bajpai look good from the poster. but i hope jha changes his style a bit…i enjoyed both gangajal and aparahan, but they both had a similar feel…if rajneeti is more of the same then he could become another bhandarkar.

    http://www.bangalorexpo.com/news/india/unable-to-attract-even-a-single-girl-frustrated-man-sues-axe/

    i didnt know where to put this up…but i found this article and law suit hilarious…mayb q can give us some insight on the case…

    Like

  11. Hey Sarvanash,
    Are you implying Q has had the same experience with Axe????

    Like

  12. sarvanash Says:

    haha no…i meant some expert legal insight…from what i hear q doesn’t need the axe effect.

    Like

    • This article shows yet again how sloppy the Indian media can be. Check out this opening line: “In what could prove to be a major marketing and legal embarrassment for Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL)…”

      I mean, are they serious?! A guy is unable to attract EVEN ONE girl for seven years, and it’s HUL that’s gonna be embarrassed?

      This lawsuit doesn’t even pass the laugh test

      Like

  13. Hope this movie should be different from other saga old monotonous and boring politics masala. but its Jha movie so I am interested to watch but my xpectation is set at 00…

    Like

  14. Katrina really stands out like a sore thumb. It seems odd to see her in a film like this. I would have expected someone like Vidya Balan instead.

    Like

  15. Really looking forward to this for a solid cast overall. Katrina remains the glaring exception, but let’s see.

    Like

  16. Ah! after NL only in this movie Katrina seems to be rightly casted. With good director and script even she has potential to surprise skeptic like me. Her casting not only brings some surprise elements but it also brings some commercial values too.

    Like

  17. Are all the posters meant to look badly photoshopped?

    Katrina might finally impress in this one, but I don’t have any expectations.

    Like

  18. Ranbir’s role seems more like Rahul Gandhi, not Rajiv Gandhi . is Kat playing Sonya Gandhi !?
    Hope its not another political mambo jumbo with too many characters.

    Like

  19. nafees chand, bhopal Says:

    i m quite confident about that this movie will take best position in 2010, because of the great flm maker parkash jha experiences and miss beauty katrina with ajay devgan , ranbir kapoor, and so many great character.in this movie katrina role plays as sonia gandhi
    if we compare katrina and sonia gandhi ….then we will take lot of similarities just like both of them are weak in field of speeching in english, and the face is also similar….

    Like

  20. Katrina kaif is playing ranbir’s bahbahi (arjun rampal’s wife) and he seems to be romancing her (from pictures)

    GROSSSSS

    indian audince will go BERSERK

    Like

  21. alex adams Says:

    prakash jha is a v capable director who knows his job and has his own place in the contemporary scene. This seems to be his biggest movie till date, in terms of the cast and canvas.
    The cast seems interesting.
    Unfortunately, his films dont really enthuse me beyond a point. anyhow, best wishes to him for this seemingly good effort….

    Like

  22. this really has been a great season for images!

    Like

  23. and how refreshing all this authenticity (Raavan, Rakta Charitra, Raajneeti) is compared to the likes of Kites and Badmash Company. If one is a fan of Hrithik or Shahid one is certainly right to desire a hit in these instances but one should otherwise want the star in question to run away from these films. And Kites of course takes embarrassing cinema to a whole new level even if one might be too obtuse to understand this and/or too cynical to care about anything in the world as long as the box office dream is achieved. Ironically it is precisely being associated with something like Kites that will never put such a star in the universe of Jha or Rathnam or RGV. At least it becomes improbable. But this isn’t the 90s anymore. The buzz or the prestige suggested by a certain kind of cinema even when it does not have universal takers and assuredly or can only very rarely match the box office takings of even underperformers in really silly genres is of its own kind. The point that partisans in box office wars miss is precisely this — the response to a Housefull or a Kites opening big or grossing big is ‘so what?’! This is I imagine DiCaprio’s or Pitt’s or Depp’s response to Will Smith (leaving aside a Pirates or a Titanic). This is happening in Bollywood today but in truth this has always been true. Deewar is Bachchan’s single most seminal film and while it did extremely well there were very many Bachchan films that did a lot more! But nothing matters more than Deewar. We see increasingly how many of the pieces refer to Yuva as a hit. Well it might as well have been one. What more could Abhishek have derived from the film if it had been one?!

    Like

  24. lots of new images here..

    Like

  25. ideaunique Says:

    rajneeti looks a promising film……..SH is a given……let us c if it goes any further…

    Like

  26. alex adams Says:

    Must say, the new images look grand, surely promising…
    The crowd political party rally scenes seem to be captured in an intelligent manner-look authentic.
    cast i also very good for the subject.
    all the usual jha suspects -like devgun, naseer, nana are there.
    plus ranbir, katrina, rampal, bajpai thrown into the mix.
    On paper-looks a volatile mix.
    it just that, somehow jha doesnt seem to be capable of going ALL the way- i mean a critical AND commercial blockbuster.
    although this does seem to have the potential here.
    kaif/sonia gandhi placement is also good –good casting overall
    agree with pradip abovoe- after namaste london, kaif is in a role where she appears to fit really well.
    did someone suspect, katrina is ranbirs bhabhi and rampals wife here–hmmm-seems interesting-well thought of by jha (if true).
    If jha has handled this well (as some pics suggest), he can have a real winner.
    as box-office blockbuster status, i have lost conviction and faith esp after seeing realtive crap “sailing through” eg in the cae of houseful and mnik in the name of “entertainment” and “highlighting genuine angst” respectively.
    genuine original tricky efforts like rajneeti, raavan begin with a disdvatntage in terms of the target/ (trivial) audience and repeat viewings.
    again- that is where aamir has scored recently- conquering box-office whilst still incorporating the risky and original.

    Like

    • ideaunique Says:

      content-wise, this looks a far far better film than MNIK and HF….it is bound to strike a jackpot in UP,BIHAR, RAJASTHAN,DELHI….let’s c how the other territories respond – but it seems to have all the makings of a SH

      Like

    • MNIK is flop. housefull is hit because of Akshay.

      Like

  27. wish they had some better music..

    Like

  28. UTV to release Prakash Jha’s Raajneeti across 2100 screens worldwide

    MUMBAI: UTV Motion Pictures is all set to release Prakash Jha’s Raajneeti across 2100 screens worldwide on 4 June. In India, the movie will be released across 1800 screens.

    Raajneeti stars Ajay Devgn, Naseeruddin Shah, Nana Patekar, Manoj Bajpai, Arjun Rampal, Ranbir Kapoor and Katrina Kaif among others.

    The film is about Indian politics, democracy and elections. It is the story of a few people who control the destiny of millions.

    Jha said, “Politics is something we play every day, between friends, relatives and society. This film deals with aspirations, greed and loyalty.”

    UTV Group CEO and founder chairman Ronnie Screwvala added, “Raajneeti is a very powerful film. It has a very strong narrative about life in this country.”

    The cast and crew of the film will be travelling across seven cities namely Delhi, Bangalore, Ahmadabad, Indore, Chandigarh, Lucknow and Kolkatta to promote the film.

    Speaking to Businessofcinema.com, UTV Motion Pictures CEO Siddharth Roy Kapur said, “As a part of the promotions, we will be travelling to the colleges in these seven cities and interacting with students there.”

    In Delhi, the team will be meeting students at Shri Ram College of Commerce, in Bangalore it will be held at the Brigade Convention Center and in Kolkatta the rally will be held at IIM.

    Like

    • ideaunique Says:

      2100 screens worldwide? that’s a massive release and i believe bigger than MNIK – it would be fun if breaks MNIK’s records 😉 than one can say that Prakash Jha is bigger than KJO 😉

      Like

  29. is katrina kaif genuinely displaying an emptiness in her eyes bcoz of some loss(like d death of her husband)..or is it just d lack of expressions??!!

    Like

  30. alex adams Says:

    “is katrina kaif genuinely displaying an emptiness in her eyes bcoz of some loss(like d death of her husband)..or is it just d lack of expressions??!!”—right said fred…
    we should give her the benefit of doubt. maybe se has master method-actin and has got into the “skin” of the character–hahaha.
    she has also lately apparently said that she admires sonia gandhi-she is learning how to make the “right-politically correct” noises as well-something that her alleged boy-friend has still not mastered.
    anyhow, kaif here as well as the whole cast, set up and ambience of this movie continues to impress—if jha ha not goofed up in the actual filming process, the canvas and stage seems set for a biggie (atleast on paper)…

    Like

  31. alex adams Says:

    if i remember correctly, jhas next is supposed to be aarakshan or something on reservation—apparently his most amibitous one till now helming the big bachchan and devgun.
    i dont mind bahccan doing something with jha but the theme looks a bit dodgy and shaky—plus will definitely have controversies and protests etc—something bachchan has recently had enuf of eg iifa-lanka and modi-gujarat.
    not sure,if he actually does this movie with jha…

    Like

  32. “right political noises” nd katrina kaif?!!..nooooo….
    was watching one of the promotional events of raajneeti dat took place at iim bangalore a few days back..where ms. kaif was asked by d interviewer “so which party’s govt. is in power”? nd d missy said BJP ..to which everyone laughed (including me) nd d interviewer said “aapne aaj bjp ko toh zaroor khush kar diya hoga”!!
    talk abt. being POLITICALLY correct..ha ha!!

    Like

    • whats wrong with that, bJP are ofcourse in power in whole of karnataka and certainly in bangalore. they swept the recent local municipal elections, didnt they? why were people including you laughing at her. she has shown immense control of emotions by not laughing back at you people.

      Like

  33. alex adams Says:

    “so which party’s govt. is in power”? nd d missy said BJP ..”—oh, is that what she said , mansi?–lol
    Did not know that. for all her lack of acting and hindi ability, i do find her hard-working, focussed and well-grounded (inspite of her relative success).
    Did not know that her GK is that bad..
    apparently, she is working on her acting and hindi skills lately. give her credit on another front–still has managed to keep her realtionship with salman a bit of a mystery–not sure , what the exact deal is there— what do u think?–lol
    and she has kept that volatile guy under relative control —-not a mean feat…

    Like

    • actually..i dont grudge her success..u r right..she has worked hard nd is focussed nd ppl in general really seem to like her..so yeah..good for her..!!
      nd yeah..being with sallu for so many years is no mean feat but i dont think they r gonna marry..she seems a bit “chant” to me if u know what it means..she is gonna mint all d sucess in India nd then marry some filthy rich businessman in Britain..thats my prophecy..nd i dont think sallu will mind it dat much..!!

      Like

  34. alex adams Says:

    “..she seems a bit “chant” to me if u know what it means”-haha mansi.
    although i probably sort of know what u mean, can u please elaborate “chant” for my “education” and enlightenment

    Like

  35. alex adams Says:

    ooh, thats what u meant-thanks mansi. i agree she will be sensible enuf not to marry him eventually.
    and then what is salman being doing all this while–and then “not minding” it conveniently later when he marries a “british businessman”.

    anyhow, as u said, she certainly has minted,infact “milked” this connection to salman for all its worth esp in the early parts of her career.
    you just have to see her n boom to see where she started her career with. actually, personally dont mind her “performance” in boom too much…

    Like

    • plss..uss “boom” movie ka naam mat lo mere saamne!!
      nd u wait nd watch..my prophecy will come true..she ain’t gonna marry sallu but then who would want to marry that mental?!

      Like

  36. The still at the top is fantastic!

    Like

  37. Why_so_serious Says:

    I was just complaining about Reliance & Abhishek’s involvment in Mani’s films.

    Looking at the stills, I really hope Mani doesn’t sign Ranbir Kapoor as the recent reports suggest, and I will grant Abhishek still. Ranbir has just replaced Abhishek as the most overrated actor in Indian cinema. Oh wait, there’s still Ajay Devgan, Arjun Rampal, Katrina Kaif (Bangs head into the table)..

    Like

  38. Why_so_serious Says:

    Looking forward to Manoj Bajpai & Nasseerudhin shah, at least we will get some “performance” and not non-actors posing, in name of acting..

    Like

    • It’s tough to buy the “interacting with people” motive here when he only speaks to a reporter during this entire stunt.

      Like

  39. Prakash Jha cuts Raajneeti to fit UA certificate

    The tension over the censoring of Raajneeti is over. But not without some vital scenes featuring Ranbir Kapoor and Arjun Rampal getting the chopper. Arjun Rampal’s love-making scene with Katrina has been reduced drastically.

    Says the director Prakash Jha regretfully, “It was a very aesthetically shot love making scene. Arjun and Katrina are two very beautiful people. And they made love to the camera. The Tribunal felt it was a bit too explicit for a ‘UA’ audience. I didn’t argue.”

    However, Katrina who had dropped her normal inhibitions for the sake of her role and character is none too pleased with her labour of love-making going to waste.

    But the director can breathe easy now. Prakash Jha’s week- long battle with the censor board ended on Tuesday with the Tribunal viewing the film and granting it a ‘UA’ certificate. Jha had challenged the censorboard’s decision earlier last week to grant Raajneeti an ‘A’ certificate with cuts.

    Apparently, the censorboard had earlier objected to two sequences one showing the rigging of elections by fitting ballot boxes with specially designed gadgets and the other showing a female politician offering sex in exchange for an election ticket.

    Jha wouldn’t listen to any talk of cuts with the censorboard.

    Says Jha, “An ‘A’ certificate brings on a specific mind-set on the audience. They think the film has sleazy content. So I preferred to let the film be referred to the Tribunal.”

    Jha sees the reduction of the Katrina-Arjun love-making scene as a blow. “The love scene was absolutely essential. Unlike other directors I had not shot extra footage so that the censors could take away whatever portion they liked. I had shot the love-making scene exactly the way it was meant to be. I’ve had to reduce it by half.”

    Says Jha, “It’s a disappointment to all of us. I’ve also had to beep out the F… word uttered by Ranbir and Arjun Rampal in two different places in the plot. Ex-justice Usha Mehra who headed the Tribunal requested me to do away with the F… word. It didn’t make a difference.”

    Incidentally several recent Hindi films were plastered with expletives in Hindi and English. Also Arjun’s volatile character in Raajneeti shouts lurid and graphic expletives in Hindi at a police officer. These remain intact while the ‘F’ word is gone.

    Like

    • It’s very unfortunate that the censors continue to have such a juvenile mindset.. meanwhile in film after film there are sleazily clad women doing the raunchiest numbers imaginable!

      Like

      • Re: ” Arjun and Katrina are two very beautiful people. And they made love to the camera.”

        Jha is more right than he perhaps knows.

        On the cut related to election rigging, that is completely unacceptable (I do sympathize with the government’s view in the sense that no one has come out with even a shred of evidence that elections have been ELECTRONICALLY rigged with these new voting machines, or that this what happened during the 2009 elections; and hence they presumably don’t want public confidence in the process compromised by irresponsible innuendo, especially given that Jha has in the past campaigned for the NDA — but there is nothing in the universal/adult film divide that relates to this issue!)

        Like

    • Love struck

      Arjun Rampal’s love making sequence in Raajneeti was so explicit that it was deleted from the theatre version, but it will be shown in the DVD version

      Subhash K Jha & Kunal M Shah

      Posted On Friday, May 28, 2010 at 02:03:16 AM

      A love-making sequence in Prakash Jha’s Raajneeti featuring Arjun Rampal and a theatre actress (name withheld) turned out so explicit that the actress in question has requested the director to keep her name out of the credits. The sequence was voluntarily deleted from the film before it was submitted for censoring.

      Arjun Rampal too was shocked at how far they had gone with the love-making before the director shouted ‘cut’. After they viewed the sequence, both Arjun and Prakash Jha were uncomfortable with its explicitness.

      “Yeh thoda zyada ho gaya,” Jha told Arjun. Even the actress requested that her name be kept out of the credits. Arjun, who has lately pulled out all stops to get into character, feared the love-making sequence would not go down well with his wife and daughters. He even requested a re-shoot.

      While neither the director nor the actor is willing to reveal details of the scene, a source reveals that it involves a hopeful female electoral candidate who approaches Arjun for an election ticket — with the willingness to do anything for it.

      Prakash Jha
      Says the source, “The girl begins to seduce Arjun. They end up making torrid love.

      This is where the content went out of hand.” Jha says, “Yes, it’s true that we removed the love-making scene before submitting it to the censor board. But we plan to include it in the DVD version.”

      Like

      • Has Jha made a film about politics or lovemaking? !

        I love the fact that two journalists are credited for this story. Indicates the depth of the investigative reporting.

        Like

      • Hilarious! Like something out of a trashy airport novel, lol. How can one get “carried away” before 3 dozen technicians, make-up artistes, all the shor sharaaba, and the artificial lighting?!

        Like

  40. the trailers have been sort of underwhelming so far..

    Like

  41. jayshah Says:

    This is being promoted as a Ranbir-Katrina flick … all the radio adverts here mention them and the song they share and thats about it.

    Like

    • that makes sense.. because you tell an NRI audience that it’s an authentic heartland sort of film about politics and they’d rather see serial killers and serious rapists on screen!

      The family audience in Indian multiplexes is cut from the same cloth.

      Like

  42. alex adams Says:

    Jha sees the reduction of the Katrina-Arjun love-making scene as a blow. “The love scene was absolutely essential.”—hahaha
    “Arjun Rampal too was shocked at how far they had gone with the love-making before the director shouted ‘cut’. “-even more lol…
    “Arjun and Katrina are two very beautiful people. And they made love to the camera. “–has jha been keeping te complany of jagmohan “monsoon” mundhra.–what exactle is jha intending to do here.
    also it seems as if the “bull” rampal got berserk and overdid the intended scene…lol

    Like

    • not surprised at all.. with a Bachchan though this film might never have released.

      Like

      • Amit kumar pandey Says:

        very well pointed out satyam.. indeed if any of the bachchans were in this movie.. it would have been a sorry affairs for the movie maker..it might not have released 😉 poor politicians. leaving all other important things for welfare to the people giving their mind n soul for just a movie..

        Like

  43. So the Mahabharat and ramayan from bollywood are coming at the same time in India.Coincidence.

    Like

  44. this might seem trivial but why does almost everyone have such long serious faces. just because its politics doesn’t mean one looses their sense of humor. in fact politicians exploit us with greedy smiles on their faces. as i see it this is the key ingredient to the success of films like ghajani and rdb that the serious shots were very well balanced with a spurt of humor. there was relief after an intense scene, hope raajneeti has been induced with such light and funny moments or there will be no relief.

    Like

  45. very positive Taran review:

    http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/review/13904/index.html

    at 3 hrs the film is quite long for this sort of subject. Will be interesting to see how it does. I am actually very pleased by the longer running time though as it means there is really more time for the plot to unfold.

    Like

    • Amit kumar pandey Says:

      yaa satyam .read it..

      it was looking from the beginning that this movie will be good in the hands of prakash jha..see he has delivered again..

      I will become a hit movie 🙂 and the good thing satyam is that this movie looks really sensible where people need to use their brain s unlike recent moves 😉

      i am going on vizag trip this weekend.. will watch it once i will be back and if possible give my thoughts on it..

      Amit

      Like

    • mksrooney Says:

      yup just read it.. and i have fears that if this one picks a storm ala rang de basanti type with youth… raavan is in danger.. i hope raavan turn out equally good.

      ps- i m taking tarans word as he found it entertaining.. and we all know ranbir + good dialogue baazi + katrina + powerful starcast + naseer types/.. its got a universal theme which might interest ppl more than ravaana if this strikes gold…

      also above observation depends upon date of ravan release i guess it releases on june 18?? it can damage it in the region of class audience..

      Like

      • Amit kumar pandey Says:

        what might be danger for raavan is monsoon season in India where it will be raining all along and people might want to stay at home.. and other major drawback might come is FIFA World cup starting..

        Anyhow what i believe and i guess everyone must be feeling is if Raavan has been made good with good content people will definitely watch it and give it a thumbs up 🙂

        i wish for it 🙂

        Amit

        Like

  46. Raajneeti gets mixed reactions

    The countdown is almost over. Prakash Jha’s Raajneeti that hits theatres on June 4, already has movie buffs and reviewers talking about the much awaited political saga. While some have trashed the film calling it a migrane, others have given it a thumbs up.

    Taran Adarsh writes, “Raajneeti talks of warring cousins, dynastic rule and electoral politics, besides the vicious and horrifying games some people play to attain power. It takes time for the story to sink in, but slowly and steadily, you get sucked into a world that’s dark, dangerous and demonish. The story alters constantly, unravelling in a serpentine manner and speed… so much so that you don’t know what’s gonna happen next. It keeps you awed at the constant turn of events.”

    “The flipside? None, actually. The naysayers may point out that the subject material is ‘heavy’, ‘serious’ and ‘dry’, but you ought to know that when you adapt Mahabharata in the current milieu (present-day politics), you can’t expect item songs and slapdash humour and mimicry,” he adds.

    However, Raja Sen of Rediff differs. “Mammoth Raajneeti migraine. Review tomorrow, but for now all I can say is this ain’t getting my vote, baby,” he posted on Twitter.

    Koel Puri tweets on koelscouch: Kat delivers in Raajneeti. Also it’s entirely inspired frm Mahabharata, there are no good guys, all dark as hell. Really enjoyed but for length. We hadn’t witnessed such events in real life either first hand or via media. Too long though, unnecessary masala subplots ridiculous esp AjayDevgn’s.”

    Priya Ramani, Editor of Mint Lounge, posted on Twitter, “One more reaction to Raajneeti: 3 Responses to Raajneeti so far: ‘migraine’, ‘mostly gripping, great script and performances’ and ‘interesting but too much plotting’ -confused.”

    With mixed reviews and reactions, what remains to be seen is whether the film is able to get the ticket windows buzzing at the box office unlike other recent releases.

    Like

    • The length might make this one tricky. An intense 3 hr drama? The aunties might run for the hills!

      In all seriousness the reviewers who have problems in terms of length and subplots and so on.. all those criticisms might be valid but it’s also true that these reviewers much like the audience have been fed on a diet of light, disposable cinema for so long that they just don’t have the stamina for anything more involved. Leaving this aside given how generously the same films are treated by these same reviewers I think that the Rajneeti kind of film comes in for some harsh treatment at times in the sense that the bar is always raised. Just because a political subject is being attempted doesn’t mean it has to be a masterpiece. Again these are just preliminary reviews and of course I haven’t seen the film yet but I’m making a more general point.

      Ranbir’s coming in for some great reviews though. Incidentally he had a very endearing appearance on Indian Idol the other day.

      Like

      • Interesting comment and one I agree with:

        TheSkeptic: Consider this: Every single performance of Ranbir’s so far is his career-best and there are absolutely no flaws or missteps. He seems better than Pacino and Brando, who I am sure got *some* negative notices. Either we have the greatest actor to hit the screen in cinematic history here, or we have someone so undistinctive that he offends no one.

        Like

        • I don’t think anyone could dispute this…even those of us who like him right now realize he’s not exactly pushing the limits of acting! If anyone said he’s the heir apparent to any given titan, they need their head checked.

          But what he is is the most watchable and probably likable among his very unestablished generation of wannabes and cookie-cutter movie stars. This is no great achievement, but given what one gets with movie actors these days, he comes off looking like something far better than he actually is.

          Like

        • agreed on the latter.. I’ve however noticed this interesting thing about him that he gives off more of a star aura off screen than on it! I remember watching (and loving) a long interview he did at his home before the Saawariya release and he was very different compared to his persona in the film. Again at the Indian Idol the other day he looked great (the new look suits him as well). In films he’s a natural performer, fluid for sure but not yet ‘interesting’ to my mind. Rajneeti certainly gives him the chance to be the latter. From the trailers Bajpai looks to be a bit of a scene stealer but this could well be the sort of dialog-heavy film where the restrained guy comes off the best.

          Like

        • I think what you’ve underestimated is precisely this thing about being a natural, fluid performer, which is really something that 99% of Hindi movie actors at the moment are simply not capable of. It’s this quality (and really this alone because Ranbir is not particularly inventive or epoch-defining!) that actually does make him an interesting presence. Every other guy today even with a decent performance shows their sweat on screen – which is perhaps entirely in keeping with a generation of screen actors who seem to be more athletic than they are actorly.

          Like

        • true but ‘fluidity’ can be normalized very easily if it is not tied to something distinctive in terms of the actor’s screen presence or style of performance. The classic example here is Shahid who is very fluid too but just not a ‘persona’ on screen and just not ‘surprising’ as an actor. So ‘fluidity’ is a great quality to have but it can be of a sort where the actor simply keeps up with audience expectation and does not offer anything intrinsically interesting otherwise. To put it another way I think the truest star-actors do make their audiences uncomfortable from time to time. Sometimes this is the ‘obstacle’ that allows them to become great but in any case they can become good or fluid performers around this. Ranbir so far acts the way I would expect a competent ‘natural’ performer to act. Shahid’s the same way. The former is definitely more star than the latter though. and again as a general matter I am always skeptical of the star-actor who gets accepted too easily. Because nothing authentic can be instantly absorbed. Having said that I will add this: Ranbir has never been accepted like a Hrithik. Which is not about the box office but about the fact that people did not instantly love his persona the way they did Hrithik’s.

          Like

        • Ha, that’s interesting. It was specifically Shahid I was thinking of as the actor that defines this sense of exertion, of being a wannabe, on screen.

          Like

        • that’s surprising.. I’ve never seen him as less than a natural performer on screen..

          Like

        • The truth is somewhere in between. I have so far not seen a Ranbir on screen who has matched the hype. Talented yes but nothing extraordinary so far. But the ‘narrative’ on him has always been that of a fine actor. I don’t think any reasonable person could consider Saawariya, BeH, WUS, APKGK, Rocket Singh great performances. He is promising for sure. But let’s talk about what we HAVE seen so far. he did not impress me in the Rajneeti trailers but I will wait for the film. Ranbir could be Pacino tomorrow but he certainly does not have anything at the moment to justify that narrative (which let us not forget has its political overtones both in the media and in the blogosphere!). It’s one thing for a star to have a breakout performance moment and then get overrated at times. But Ranbir doesn’t have it yet. Where I do agree with theskeptic is that in terms of the kind of actor he is so far he clearly does not offend anyone. and yeah even Pacino or Brando wouldn’t deserve that sort of hype without the roles (though I have always been a bit of a naysayer on Brando). The role defines the star. This is what separates the good or promising talent from the fine or great one. In fairness I don’t think the Rajneeti part is of the sort where Ranbir could be mind-blowing. But he could be impressive. I’ll wait for the film to decide.

          Either way Ranbir does not lose here in commercial terms even if the film suffers. Also I think he expands the base in terms of getting perhaps a segment of the audience involved that wouldn’t otherwise patronize this sort of subject.

          Like

  47. Rajneeti Has An Average Advance

    Thursday 3rd June 2010 18.30 IST

    Boxofficeindia.Com Trade Network

    The advance booking of Rajneeti has seen an average response at most places in India. There were pretty high expectations from the trade regarding the opening for the film but looking at the advance a very big opening seems unlikely though it is possible the Friday audience may come in a big way.

    The biggest reason for the lukewarm advance is that Ranbir Kapoor has a huge following amongst the youth but due to politic theme its not the type of film that the youth patronises especially at the urban multiplexes.

    The film should open better in places like UP, Bihar, MP and Rajasthan but Mumbai, Delhi and East Punjab multiplexes may have to depend on word of mouth.

    http://www.boxofficeindia.com/npages.php?page=shownews&articleid=1730&nCat=news

    Like

    • Note how they do damage control for every star but a Bachchan. So Rajneeti is not supposed to be a reflection on Ranbir’s star standing. But who in their right mind thinks it is for this sort of film?! And if the industry/media are sometimes unfair about these things well so Ranbir suffers along with everyone else! Of course I doubt they would get even a half decent advance without him and Katrina.

      With this sort of subject you’re never going to see a big advance in the multiplexes.

      Like

  48. India Today review:

    http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/100108/Top%20Stories/Raajneeti:+Absorbing+palette+straight+from+Mahabharata.html

    positive one but this bit jumps out:

    “It’s a film often brutal and quite violent, in its sex scenes as well as gunslinger scenes. There’s a man caught in bed with another man, a woman felt up by a man and brought to orgasm in front of a mirror, a shower scene and even a bed scene, done tastefully keeping Kaif’s A-list status in mind.”

    Like

    • jayshah Says:

      LOL. The comment has sold me to book my ticket!!!

      Like

      • LOL, no one’s going to believe me but I was going to check this out anyway!

        Like

        • jayshah Says:

          Is their not great irony in Arjun Rampal being the “heir” to Naseer in a film LOL

          Like

        • I shudder to think what part of the comment sold you guys. I wont even ask.

          Like

        • the remarkable thing is that the censors edited the bedroom scene to half its length but didn’t have a problem with this other stuff! what’s going on?!

          Like

        • Jha may have overshot the sequence on purpose, anticipating cuts.

          Like

        • But the scenes with the woman and the politician and the alleged homosexual scene were specifically mentioned in the censor cuts, I thought. Or maybe they were originally supposed to be cut, and the review tribunal allowed them. I can’t remember clearly any more, but it was in one of the articles I posted earlier in some thread or other.

          GF, Jha specifically said that he only shot exactly the amount that he needed, so the cuts would detract from his vision of the film. Of course he may have been saying that for PR purposes.

          Like

        • yes there were indeed two sexual scenes, the second one was indeed cut. Didn’t know about the homosexual scene. Of course this kind of twinning of politics and sex (and even in its perverse aspects) is an old trope! It’s always a mistake to define sex (and perversions related to this) as the singular provenance of those in the movies or sports or politics. The real perversions are found in bourgeois classes and many practices are even canonized! But in a classic move this very class uses those high profile professions to project its own fantasies (or realities!). We seem to have forgotten Freud’s lesson — so much of sexual abnormality really emerges from the bourgeois universe (an example: all female neuroses emerge from the marriage bed!). This is really his privileged model all the time! And if it is therefore socially determined well the bourgeoisie of the Indian subcontinent in the post-Independence period would not seem to be the worst approximation of fin-de-siecle Vienna or late Victorian Britain in terms of sexual attitudes!

          Like

  49. All the reviews are saying what I expected from the movie and it’s a definite must watch for me. Jha seems to have woven the mythology with the Godfather and politics quite well and though it might not get the boxoffice ecstatic I think lover of good cinema will appreciate the film.

    Like

  50. Might watch it tomorrow.. Hoping to share my thoughts by the evening

    Like

  51. NY Times:

    June 4, 2010
    Prakash Jha’s ‘Godfather,’ Bhopal Version
    By RACHEL SALTZ
    Published: June 4, 2010

    Prakash Jha’s new Hindi film, “Raajneeti,” takes a dim view of the Indian political scene. Extortion, intimidation and murder (with car bombs, wooden bats and, less creatively, guns) engage the movie’s politicians far more than any platform or position.

    Mr. Jha has said he based the dynastic family at the film’s heart on characters from the epic “Mahabharata,” and there are also parallels to the Gandhi clan (generation Sonia). But Mr. Jha’s real touchstone seems to be “The Godfather.”

    Take the quiet Samar Pratap (Ranbir Kapoor), the Michael Corleone figure. He has just finished his dissertation (on Victorian poetry, no less) at an American university but becomes entangled in the internecine wars of the Pratap clan, the ruling family of an Indian state. (Just when he thought he was out, they pull him back in!)

    “Raajneeti,” with its large cast of characters and wealth of subplots, is often a mess, but an interesting one. Shot in Bhopal, the film at first shows us the India of crowded, dusty lanes, though it quickly retreats to the mansions of the powerful. A similar bait and switch occurs with Sooraj (a brooding Ajay Devgan), a man-of-the-people antihero, who is soon co-opted by the Prataps.

    Perhaps Mr. Jha’s point is that the system absorbs and corrupts outsiders as easily as it mouths banalities about poverty. Except the film — full of romance, intrigue and fraternal strife — is too diffuse to score political points. Or to have much impact.

    Like

  52. ideaunique Says:

    it seems everyone is raving abt. ranbir – i am glad that he did this film – he is THE NEXT SUPERSTAR – no doubts – his choice of scripts is too good. WUS, ROCKET,SAAWARIYA, APK…and his lineup is very impressive….the man would achieve what his dad coudn’t…..

    Like

    • two of those films didn’t work though.. not sure what you mean? Is it ok finally to have interesting roles and films even when they don’t work?!

      Like

      • ideaunique Says:

        yes satyam…not as a general rule but for ranbir – as far as i know, in all his films -his perf. was good and praised also – but what is more important i feel is that he has struch a chord with audiences – he has been universally accepted as a versatile actor and not just a romantic hero…i think what he has achieved in such a short time is really really commendable…not even aamir, hritik, srk had achieved so much in initial few years of their careers (pl. note that I am not comparing anyone here but just as a matter of fact – this man has come and conquered BW)….RK is choosing good scripts, working with different directors, working with different heroines…..everything is going for him at the moment….

        Like

        • I’ll disagree here.. Saawariya was a bomb, I don’t think he came in for particular praise here. Since then yes (though people were praising him as much even before a single release!). BeH did only as much as D6 or a bit more. WUS did only about as much as Rock On. Rocket Singh did less than WUS and did not work. APKGK was a big one but even its fan wouldn’t call it a brilliant script! Rajneeti is again a good venture. It’s box office picture remains to be determined. of his upcoming films what’s special about Rockstar and Anjana Anjani?! These films are likely to be hits but hardly great ventures in the making!

          I think a number of different claims are being merged here:

          1)Scripts — it is self-evidently true that he’s doing mediocre scripts in as much frequency as good ones. also does anyone really sign up for a love story with Santoshi expecting a big one? Surely he got lucky here? What’s the script that would have impressed one with this film?

          2)Box office — one big winner in AJPKGK. BeH was half decent, WUS half-decent (Ranbir’s standard cannot be Rock On!). But he’s likely to get a big one in a couple of these upcoming films at the very least

          3)Perception — the actor perception was there before he had even debuted! It wasn’t exactly waiting for empirical evidence!

          He is definitely a promising star and one who’s accomplished enough this early in the game. But my point here is let’s be fair about the nature of the achievement. We can look at the totality of what he’s done right now and say he’s in a very good place. But he has hardly been extraordinary at the box office nor in terms of his scripts.

          Like

        • quinqart Says:

          people forget one thing that for a star to become a superstar its very imp that audience love you.
          wat is this shit taht some day he will be the biggest superstar or#1 or watever.
          the concept of superstar is dying and i blv that khans are the last superstars of india.
          Ranbir has evrything one needs to have to become a superstar but again thats not enough.
          ranbir was more in news for his affair with deepika and ideaunique lemme tell you dont even compare hrithiks debut and ranbirs.ranbirs all films combined will not be able to match up KNPH.

          Like

        • actually I haven’t seen a superstar after Bachchan! The word has been diluted and cheapened to the extent that now it’s used for every other star. The box office implications of the word were such when Rajesh Khanna and then of course Bachchan was judged to be a superstar that using that standard any star since has not even been in the same universe of stardom!

          Like

    • Dude, before we talk about “what his dad couldn’t”, let us remember that Rishi Kapoor had the historical bad luck to come of age in a post-Zanjeer world. It wasn’t just that Amitabh was ruling the roost, but that Bachchan changed the whole paradigm, and Rishi Kapoor — more accurately, what Rishi brought to the table — could never be part of the dominant paradigm except in a supporting way. By the time a Chandni etc. rolled around, it was too late. Ranbir is luckier than his dad — not necessarily better.

      Like

      • ideaunique Says:

        agreed Q – what i mean to say is that rishi was/is immensely liked by public but somehow he was never considered in top 5 or so…..and he got stuck with his romantic hero image….and ur abs. right abt. BIG B’ rule at that time – he simply crushed all opposition…

        Like

      • agreed.. about being better there’s nothing I’ve seen from Ranbir so far that equals his father’s Bobby work. But Ranbir will ultimately ‘mean’ more than his father. For all the reasons you’ve pointed out.

        Like

      • I Agree with you.Ranbir is not a good actor from what I have seen now.He is passable,he was reasonably good in wus,bad in ajab.Ajab itslef was very very bad film.
        Lets see how he does in coming films.Its too early to make a judgement on him.As of now,I dont think he is No1 material.

        Like

    • there’s always an interesting lesson when the US media reviews Indian movies. We recently saw Kites being treated so kindly and now we see both the NY Times and the LA Times not really kind on Rajneeti. When it’s a completely non-serious film they have the ‘hey it’s Bollywood stupid!’ attitude. When it’s a serious film though they immediately put on their proper critical hats and then the films don’t fare so well.

      Like

    • This reviewer did not like Rajneeti at all – 1/5

      Loosely based on the ancient epic Mahabharata and its tale of princes angling for a kingdom, producer-director-co-writer Prakash Jha aims for something trenchant about thwarted destiny and ugly ambition in modern Indian democracy but mostly winds up with a convoluted and tonally awkward “Godfather” rehash, with nary a character worth rooting for. Tracking the moral descent of Samar from family outsider to ruthless power player — this movie’s Michael Corleone — is meant to be the film’s searing throughline. But Kapoor’s performance is stony rather than calculating — especially jarring compared to the histrionic turns around him — while the third act shift to tit-for-tat violence feels less like inevitably tragic fate than an all-too-late adrenaline boost.

      Like

    • some positive NY Times reviews of ‘serious’ films:

      June 10, 2002
      FILM REVIEW; Gandhi Is Eclipsed by Another Revolutionary Hero of India’s Freedom Fight
      By DAVE KEHR
      Published: June 10, 2002

      According to the Planet Bollywood Web site, ”over three films” are in production in Bombay, the capital of India’s Hindi cinema, about Bhagat Singh, a young Sikh revolutionary who was executed by the British government in 1931.

      The first one out of the box, apparently, is ”The Legend of Bhagat Singh,” a Bollywood superproduction that had its global premiere on Friday, opening simultaneously in India and in Indian communities around the world. In New York it is playing at the Loews State Theater in Times Square, as well as at five other theaters in the other boroughs and the suburbs.

      ”The Legend of Bhagat Singh” is not as polished and appealing as ”Lagaan,” the Bollywood musical that became an international hit last year and earned an Oscar nomination for best foreign language film. But, as energetically directed by Rajkumar Santoshi, it does add to the critical mass that lately has been building up around Bollywood filmmaking, suggesting that someday soon it may explode internationally the way the Hong Kong cinema did in the late 1980’s.

      The peculiar genius of Bollywood lies in its ability to transform every kind of material — from romantic comedy to espionage thrillers — into musicals. The action simply stops for a few minutes as the characters burst into song, tablas and sitars throb on the soundtrack and dancing choruses materialize out of nowhere. The political-historical nature of ”Bhagat Singh” forces the filmmakers to curtail some of the more extreme tendencies of the Bollywood musical, but there are still plenty of startling moments: jailed hunger strikers breaking into song as they are beaten, and the hero and his two closest comrades smiling broadly and singing lustily of the glory of self-sacrifice as they march to the gallows.

      Singh, played by the glowering Ajay Devgan, was a young follower of Gandhi who became disillusioned with the Congress Party’s policy of nonviolent protest against the British imperial forces and joined a radical Marxist-Leninist group. The script, by Anjum Rajabali, portrays him as a firebrand with a sense of humor and a gift for friendship. As he gathers his followers around him — including Sushant Singh as the urbane, unpredictable Sukhdev, and D. Santosh as the comic relief camp follower Rajguru — the film effectively deifies him. He is wiser, stronger, more compassionate and more dedicated than any of the mere mortals around him. Unfortunately, he is also chaste, which poses a small but not insurmountable problem for the inevitable cute, passive Bollywood ingénue (the newcomer Amrita Rao): her big romantic ballad has to be performed as a dream sequence.

      At the same time the film is industriously building up Singh’s stature, it is quietly tearing down Gandhi’s. For the Western viewer, this is probably the picture’s most interesting aspect: far from being the serene sage played by Ben Kingsley in Richard Attenborough’s 1982 biographical film, Mr. Santoshi’s Gandhi (Surendra Rajan) is a faintly ridiculous poseur, whose policies play directly into the hands of the British (”He’s the ideal enemy,” one English officer notes. ”He doesn’t fight back.”)

      For all of its militant rhetoric, however, ”The Legend of Bhagat Singh” backs off from bloody exhortations. A principal theme is the need to transcend religious fighting and establish a genuine Hindu-Muslim solidarity; the film frankly admires Singh’s determined atheism, suggesting that it may be one way out of conflicts both historical and contemporary. It is hard for an outsider to sort out the political and social undercurrents that run through ”The Legend of Bhagat Singh,” but they are clearly there, and add much to the movie’s weight.

      May 8, 2002
      FILM REVIEW; The Cricketing of an Indian Village
      By DAVE KEHR
      Published: May 8, 2002

      Based in Bombay, the Hindi film industry — affectionately known as Bollywood — is one of the largest in the world, but its products are rarely seen beyond India and the Indian communities abroad. The musical ”Lagaan,” however, has leapt over the usual boundaries. It became a genuine popular success in London last year, crossing over to a general audience, and now it is reopening in New York, after having played the Indian neighborhoods last summer, and opening in Los Angeles. Its New York venue is the Film Forum in the South Village, where the regular audience of refined filmgoers might be expected to view ”Lagaan” with condescension.

      That would be wrong. Nearly four hours long — about standard length for a Hindi film — and filled with extravagant production numbers, impossibly attractive performers and a generous selection of classic melodramatic devices, ”Lagaan” may look naïve; it is anything but. This is a movie that knows its business — pleasing a broad, popular audience — and goes about it with savvy professionalism and genuine flair.

      ”Lagaan” is set during British rule in India, but the film has none of the nostalgia for the lost empire that typically informs both English and American films on the subject. Ashutosh Gowariker, who wrote and directed the film, portrays the British Army as conscienceless oppressors, who cynically play the local rajahs against one another while collecting protection money from them all. That money, called lagaan, is ostensibly a land tax, but effectively a tribute — paid by the local farmers to their local chief, who in turn pays off the English.

      It hasn’t rained for two years in Champaner, a village in sweltering central India, but Captain Russell (Paul Blackthorne, who is a Billy Zane doppelgänger), the commander of the local British regiment, isn’t about to give the parched villagers a break. He makes a bet with Bhuvan (Aamir Khan), the most spirited of the villagers (and of course, the handsomest), but only because he believes it’s a sure thing: If the villagers can beat the British regiment in a cricket match, he’ll cancel the land tax for two years; if the British win, the villagers will have to pay three times the normal, unreasonable amount.

      Captain Russell feels confident because the villagers have absolutely no idea of how cricket is played. But Bhuvan believes that it is close enough to a game called gilli-danda” they all played as children, and with the clandestine assistance of the captain’s sister, Elizabeth (Rachel Shelley), who’s appalled by her brother’s cruelty, Bhuvan begins putting together a team.

      Mr. Khan, who plays Bhuvan, is one of India’s two or three biggest stars, and he has the kind of pouty, smoldering good looks that are pinned to the walls of teenage girls’ bedrooms the world over. The man is the erotic center of the film, as is often the case in Bollywood movies, and he is fought over by two aggressive women — Gauri (Gracy Singh), the village girl who has loved him since they were children, and the stately Elizabeth, who, for a proper Victorian lady, has surprisingly little trouble with the idea of falling in love with an Indian peasant. Their rivalry is the basis of the film’s best musical number, which finds Bhuwan and Gauri dancing out their love in the village, while Elizabeth, alone in her room in the forbidding English fortress, dreams of herself in a sari, snuggling up to Bhuvan in his humble village home.

      Like many of the classic Hollywood musicals, ”Lagaan” is a utopian fantasy of a perfect community, brought together in literal and figurative harmony. Drawing his players from the village outcasts and outsiders (the team includes both a Muslim and an untouchable), Bhuvan unites the farmers in a common front against their colonial exploiters — and even the local rajah, whose livelihood depends on the British, is drawn into the excitement of the match. The climactic tournament lasts three days and takes up, by rough estimate, some 80 minutes of screen time, as Mr. Gowariker wrings every conceivable drop of suspense out of a game that even after 225 minutes remains incomprehensible to the uninitiated.

      ”Lagaan” is perfectly positioned to be the first crossover Bollywood hit: like ”Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon,” the first martial arts movie to make it into mainstream American theaters, it’s a smooth, technically impeccable, somewhat denatured version of a culturally specific entertainment. There are none of the cameo appearances by Hindu gods and goddesses that Western audiences find off-putting, and the bouncy pop score, by the Bollywood master A. R. Rahman, avoids the higher registers that sometimes sound shrill to Western ears. The earth-toned cinematography by Anil Mehta and the densely populated, spatially complex wide-screen images created by Mr. Gowariker give the film a kind of visual assurance that is rare enough in any national cinema.

      Coming on the heels of Baz Luhrman’s heavily Bollywood-influenced ”Moulin Rouge,” ”Lagaan” seems to confirm the globalization of the genre — a mixed blessing, as always. But as the makers of ”Lagaan” well know, there’s an irresistible pleasure in rooting for the underdog. If a bunch of impoverished farmers can humiliate the British Empire, why can’t an Indian film do the same to Hollywood?

      Yuva

      A Bollywood feature from the prolific South Indian filmmaker Mani Ratnam, set in Kolkatta (the former Calcutta), where three young men from different classes and different political orientations find their lives intertwined. Middle-class Michael (Ajay Devgan) is a brilliant student who turns down an opportunity to study in America in order to lead a local revolt against a corrupt, establishment politician. Upper class Arjun (Vivek Oberoi) is a charming wastrel looking forward to immigrating to America whose life is transformed when he falls under Michael’s reformist spell. The most interesting character is Lallan (played, in a simmering, charismatic performance by Abhishek Bachchan), a street thug who becomes an enforcer for the party in power. Left out of India’s economic miracle, he’s an unpredictable, violent man who believes in self-preservation above all, in stark and pointed contrast to his coddled counterparts. Mr. Ratnam is a dynamic, natural filmmaker who happily uses every device at his disposal, from rapid-fire MTV editing to speeded-up action scenes that recall silent serials, to keep his lengthy film moving at a brisk pace. The film flags only when Mr. Ratman must turn his attention the soggy romantic subplots, in which each of the men must deal with the demands for domesticity made by their adoring but subtly domineering female companions. — Dave Kehr, The New York Times

      January 15, 2007
      Polyester and Power at Play for a Mogul and His India
      By ANDY WEBSTER
      Published: January 15, 2007

      You might think it would be difficult to fashion an entertaining account of the life of a polyester manufacturer, even a fictitious one. But the Tamil director Mani Ratnam, known for intelligent political dramas, has done so with “Guru,” an epic paean to can-do spirit and Mumbai capitalism.

      Guru is the nickname of Gurukant Desai (played by the busy Bollywood star Abhishek Bachchan, lately in “Dhoom 2” and “Umrao Jaan”), who leaves his home in rural Gujarat state for work, but later returns determined, he says more than once, not to work for the white man. On his way to becoming a business mogul, he deals in textiles, establishes the Shakti Corporation and builds factories, fueled by (another refrain) his aversion to the word “no.” He also tussles with meddlesome relatives, a press lord (Mithun Chakraborty) and of course the government. Fortunately he has his devoted wife, Sujata (the stunning Aishwarya Rai, here hardheaded and practical), to lend support. Given a rich, multidimensional role, Mr. Bachchan ably seizes on its abundant opportunities.

      Mr. Ratnam’s experience shows in his gorgeous compositions and fluency with pacing and effects; the inevitable, though unobtrusive, musical sequences display a similar command. His convictions are evident when Guru is accused by the authorities of corruption.

      Defending himself, Guru exalts India’s rising influence: “You call us the third world; why can’t we be the first world?” He adds, “Shall we tell the world that we are coming?” The soundtrack responds with martial rhythms signaling a national dynamo barreling forward.

      August 13, 2005
      With Song and Cries of Patriotism, India Revolts
      By NED MARTEL
      Published: August 13, 2005

      A Bollywood movie will usually try to seduce its audience with billowing, bejeweled costumes swaying and twirling in musical production numbers. An attractive couple will shower each other with compliments that liken their attributes to pleasing natural features: wind, a stream, bird chirps and the like. “Mangal Pandey: The Rising” uses such showstoppers to interrupt its important messages about global trade, corruption and martyrdom.

      As discordant as all that may seem, the film takes you somewhere, teaches you something and inspires smiles in a way that few retellings of the anti-imperialist revolts of 19th-century India ever have before. It’s my first time delving into the conflict between sepoys and sahibs, but it feels safe to say the gory conflict is usually not so lavishly embroidered, complete with sequins.

      In real life, Mangal Pandey led a failed rebellion against the British military leaders he served, and his biography is the basis for this spectacle of splash and meaning. The camera drinks in gorgeous landscapes and trawls through high-end bordellos, and the direction, by Ketan Mehta, is suitably sweeping and swift.

      The crux of the epic is Mangal’s on-again, off-again alliance with a Glaswegian military officer who is in the employ of the East India Company. William Gordon, the Scot, has left his homeland behind and is fully invested in the fragile order he has helped impose between soldier and subject.

      The overall injustice of the arrangement is obvious to all parties, and even so, Pandey and Gordon work to maintain a mutual respect. The two alpha males, played with ample gusto by Aamir Khan and Toby Stephens, square off in a wrestling pit. Together, they rescue a widow in distress just as she’s about to be consumed by the flames of her husband’s pyre.

      They each fall for women who complicate their impulses to lead many followers. They both comprehend the fraud that the mercantile class perpetrates, and they both abhor the bigoted ugliness embodied in one British soldier who indulges in prostitutes and lies about it in polite company, who uses the power he has over servants to unleash some deep-seated cruelty.

      The movie instructs and amuses with each passing hour – and there are almost three of them. At times, the racial hatred seems rabid and cartoonish, the political discussions of the opium trade become preachy, and the romance feels more like a cause for dance-offs than an exploration of intimacy.

      But the movie meets its grand incongruous aims with the exaggerated smiles and scowls of two gifted principal actors. The whole production is a cinematic mythologizing of a martyr, and Mr. Mehta manages to leaven that leaden topic. In this strange and sultry melodrama, “Mangal Pandey” proves that warfare mixed with winking sexpots can be a bloody good show.

      Like

  53. Thanks Satyam to bring Aap Ki Adalat here.

    Like

    • ideaunique Says:

      my rating for KHALI”DA” as a reviewer – (minus) ten out of 5 😦

      Like

    • This guy sucks. He reviewed “raajneeti” like a petulant 9 year old, lol. His reputation as a biased reviewer precedes him anyway!.

      oh, raajneeti is FAR better than his disaster of a film, “fiza”.

      Like

  54. BoC:

    Box Office: Raajneeti opens to 80-90% occupancy at multiplexes
    HETAL ADESARA 04 June , 2010

    MUMBAI: Prakash Jha’s multi-starrer political drama Raajneeti has opened to approximately 80 – 90 per cent occupancy at multiplexes across the country in the morning and noon shows.

    According to initial reports with Businessofcinema.com, the movie has taken a very good opening. The positive word of mouth is expected to boost the movie’s performance at the box office through the weekend. Given the political theme of the movie, its performance at single screens is also likely to be positive.

    Raajneeti stars Ajay Devgn, Nasseruddin Shah, Arjun Rampal, Ranbir Kapoor, Manoj Bajpai and Katrina Kaif amongst others. It is co-produced by Prakash Jha and UTV Motion Pictures.

    Like

  55. The reviews seem split. I’ll leave it to Rangan to be the tie-breaker here. I’m sort of wavering with this one.

    Like

  56. Why_so_serious Says:

    The adaptation of Mahabharata is to put it bluntly, shallow. There is no interesting ‘facet’ or ‘aspect’ or ‘subversion’ to talk about. So no surprises here. One cannot seriously expect a “Kalyug” here. Keeping that aside. What could have been made interesting is marred by its caricaturing, it’s not as much the caricaturing itself is bad but in the worst sense possible that it doesn’t go beyond cardboard cutouts, who do not serve to connote much in ways of better drama and thematic richness.

    As for acting performances, Bajpai getting noticed for a role that one would think is within his ballpark. One wishes he stops parodying this character in his subsequent films.

    And Oh Ranbir is Ranbir, a refined, superior version of Pacino.

    Like

    • Bajpai seems to have really won out here. A much needed shot in the arm for his career.

      Like

      • he did seem to me the most impressive in the reviews.. having said that more reviewers have praised Ranbir than anyone else.

        Like

        • No doubt, and that’s probably a result of his dominant screen time. From what I can tell, though, Ranbir seems to have made noise in the expected (read: not easily reliable) corners…with some of the less mainstream reviews I get the sense Bajpai’s the scene stealer.

          Like

  57. mksrooney Says:

    QUICK TAKE…

    KIDDY VERSION OF MAHABHARAT AND GODFATHER..

    doesnt live a lot impact, nor u feel for characters, disappoints at several level…

    but still nana patekar rocks, and compelling retelling of mahabharat…

    ranbir kapor aint al pacino.. but neither he fumbles .. its ok performance..
    KATRINA LOOKS GOOD.

    OTHER CHARACTER ACTORS PERFORM WELL

    better compare to bollywoods disposable cinema..
    OVERALL RECOMMENDED.

    ps- it was housefull, at the last choice multiplex in ahmd,
    ppl reaction was neither great nor bad.. it will carry one time watch to recommended kinda wom…

    one thumbs up.. for sheer canvas, and collective effort.. still lacked emotions..

    Like

  58. http://www.indianexpress.com/news/raajneeti/629509/

    `Raajneeti’ could have been the film of the year. It had the potential, and the actors, but it comes together only intermittently. This is not the Prakash Jha who has made some of the most politically resonant films in Hindi cinema.

    Like

  59. Sandy’s review:

    Raajneeti review: Promises big, delivers little

    Sandhya Iyer
    Friday, June 04, 2010 AT 12:00 AM (IST)

    http://www.sakaaltimes.com/SakaalTimesBeta/20100604/5355799377468386220.htm

    Like

  60. Komal Nahta’s Review: Raajneeti – 2/5

    …On the whole, Raajneeti suffers on account of a dull, boring and overly lengthy second half. Considering its very fine start, it should do reasonably good business in India but since its business in the Overseas circuit will not be good enough, it may be a problem for its worldwide distributor (UTV) to recover its investment of over Rs. 65 crore.

    http://koimoi.c2w.com/2010/06/04/komal-nahtas-review-raajneeti/

    Like

  61. alex adams Says:

    “what other Bollywood film are you likely to see more than two ‘actors’ in, let alone one frame?!”–lol

    Like

  62. alex adams Says:

    was hoping to catch it but the nearby multiplex (UK) which showed kites (and even houseful) is not even showing it…
    ranbir is ok and not bad but i fail to see ANYTHING standout in him till now (including these promos)
    from the reviews, the only positive seems that bajpai (who i like as an actor-shool, aks NOT satya) seems to have got a lease of life. so another proper “actor” saved from oblivion…

    Like

  63. Katrina’s salaam to Bajpayee

    Bowled over by his stellar performance, the actress touched the thespian’s feet; Incidentally, Tabu had done something similar years ago during the Satya premiere

    http://www.mumbaimirror.com/article/30/2010060520100605025647759bb25ae24/Katrina%E2%80%99s-salaam-to-Bajpayee.html

    Like

  64. Reviews are really split on this one.
    Understandable, given Jha’s apparent inabiltiy to connect at some level.
    I find it interesting that suddenly Jha is supposed to be this maker of excellent political dramas who somehow is not able to deliver. I never heard these people praise Jha’s earlier efforts so much before!
    Ad people who have liked OSO and/or RNBDJ should be informed that they lost the privilege of commenting on serious films a while back.

    Like

    • “I find it interesting that suddenly Jha is supposed to be this maker of excellent political dramas who somehow is not able to deliver. I never heard these people praise Jha’s earlier efforts so much before!”

      LOL, true!

      Like

    • mksrooney Says:

      problm with rajneeti rajen is that it leaves a lot to be desired… here ranbir ala michael corleones tragedy is not feeled.. i didnt cry.. neither around me any one..

      one should never forget michael life was a tragedy of a good men… and even when sonny dies u feel bad ..

      when michael feels dont insult his intelligence u feel…

      lines are same but u dont feel.. i dont blame ranbir ,but jha for it…

      also nana patekar rocks… in his krishna avatar with his smiles and all.. but see he starts the movie by introducing characters.. but at end he lord krishna doesnt commnt anything on mayhem thats been casued…

      Like

  65. Raajniti Review – **** (My own Review)

    An Explosive Drama!

    Coming from the Stable of Prakash Jha(Damul,Mrityudand,Gangajal,Apharan), is the latest offering in the form for Raajniti, which includes one of the biggest ensemble casting in recent times.

    The movie got pretty good coverage throughout its making and post-production stages.Then the promotion took it to all new level. Age old question is,does the movie deliver? And the answer is a Thumping Yes.

    The movie pretty much starts with the birth of a son from a Unmarried Mother(Later to be Ajay”Karna”Devgan),who is covered in a cloth and put near the riverside by Nana”Krishna” Patekar .

    Swiftly, it moves 30 years ahead(in today’s time), where a Patriarch Politician is trying to regain Power in his state constituency in the capacity of Chief Minister. During one of his speeches he gets an paralytic stroke.

    His Sudden retirement at a position of Power, leads to a havoc across the family where there are 2 main People vying for the coveted position.(Manoj”Duryodhan”Bajpai(son of the Patriarch) and Arjun Rampal(son of Patriarch’s Brother).

    Much to the dismay of Bajpai, his Paralytic father put his own brother(Arjun’s Father = Uncle) in Active Managing Position of the Party.

    Thus starts a Power struggle between Bajpai and Rampal.

    Also thrown in the mix are Ranbir Kapoor(Rampal’s younger brother) and Katrina Kaif(Kapoor’s Prospective lover).

    Things start shaky though still save under the Leadership of Uncle, Bajpai finds his perfect Right hand man in Devgan, who is an emerging Dalit Leader.

    But as Bajpai see’s more and more rejection of his ideas, he gets hysterical to the point of Killing his own Uncle(through Devgan), Yup!

    This thrusts an uninterested Kapoor into the dirty world of politics, where he now has to save his brother(Rampal) after his father’s Death.Where is his brother, he is in jail on charges of beating the police and on rape conviction, yeah he’s dirty too.After some struggle the Brother gets out of jail on bail.

    What about the Love Life,well, Katrina Kaif loves Kapoor but Kapoor loves his “Videshi” friend.

    Somehow Kaif ends up marrying Rampal instead of Kapoor, due to monetary reasons of running the Party.

    Now with 2 sides(Devgan/Bajpai vs Rampal/Kapoor) totally ready, what ensues in the next 1.5 hours is pure devilish acts of dirty politics, people are killed all over the place, kidnappings etc(with some Gay Tragedy thrown in )all under the watchful eyes of Patekar, things reach such levels that even Katrina jumps into the movement in the last act of the movie.

    How the movie ends, you have to see but it goes by at a very fast pace(may be little slow in the 2nd hour).

    Is the Climax satisfying, well depends what you expecting but if you go by realistic measurements by the mid of the movie you should be getting a rough idea of the things ahead. I didn’t mind it at all.

    Overall the Movie keeps you engrossed.

    Now down to the performances:

    Ranbir Kapoor : This Guy is here to stay, the way he starts as an innocent amateur and within sometime is running the whole show is amazing. Shows great screen presence. If not for the amazing cast, he might have stolen the show.

    Arjun Rampal : Plays his role to the “T”, if you didn’t like him in Om Shanti Om, if you didn’t like him in Rock On, you will definitely like him here, be it emotional outbursts or facial expression, he is there.

    Nana Patekar : Probably one of the coolest characters in last few years, he underplays to perfection. No Hysteria this time, total Coolness.

    Manoj Bajpai : Cunning,Shrewd,Crook,insecurity are just a few of his traits and even these will fail to define the character of Bajpai in the movie, he will go any extent to get “Power”. One word – Powerful.

    Ajay Devgan : Another Very Good performance by Devgan, though it must be like Child’s Play for him to do these characters, but even then he shows great control across the board.

    Katrina Kaif : Well she speaks Hindi and speaks it well. Really takes over in the penultimate sections of the movie and actually pulls it(character of Widowed Politician) off, Kudos to her, though she stumbles in some early emotional scenes.

    Cons: The movie is almost like a comic book, random killings happening, little to no existence of human emotional reasoning’s mostly at display, people moving on with life as if nothing happened, though it tries to show the addiction of Power Frenzy but its extreme to say the least. Will this affect your movie watching, probably not, because the movie has a large and mostly engrossing entertainment quotient.

    ****(4 stars)

    http://boxofficekings.com/?p=331

    Like

  66. Thanks, i am new at this, 2nd review.

    Like

  67. Yes, Raavan will be coming after 2 weeks, same time, 🙂

    Like

    • nice review Doga,welcome man @ satyamshot,although i spoke to oyu at SB on NG but pleasure to have you here..

      Like

  68. Utkal Mohanty Says:

    Well, I did say that Ranbir and Rampal are going to be the performance highlights of the film. People who havea very stereoypical view of acting were casting aspersions on the ablities of Rampal, ranbir and Katrina. Now the opinion is near unanimous that Ranbir and rampal have delivered brilliant performances and Katrina is fine. Time to open one’s mind a bit.

    Like

  69. Looking at the relative sizes of the various stars in that poster, I don’t think anyone can deny Katrina’s contribution to the opening.

    Like

  70. I don’t think Katrina itself brings those opening, Sonia’s role got the lot of attraction.

    Like

  71. alex adams Says:

    “I don’t think Katrina itself brings those opening, Sonia’s role got the lot of attraction.” Agree partly–Feel it is both–the writer and director has very intelligently but subtly kept enuf (not everything) common between sonia and katrinas (reel and real) persona…
    still havent seen the movie but am happy to see the apparent growth in arjun rampal. as pointed out by someone, he seems hungry for another award. Find him really good-looking ( in a normal sort of way) and was the really good in houseful …
    saw a few songs on tv and was surprised to see wayne sharpes name for music. know adesh srivastav has given one song; but why was a firand needed for the musci score of this v desi film–surprising to say, wayne sharp seems to have done a v good job (from the little i have seen in the promos)….

    Like

  72. alex adams Says:

    “I don’t think Katrina itself brings those opening, Sonia’s role got the lot of attraction.” Agree partly–Feel it is both–the writer and director has very intelligently but subtly kept enuf (not everything) common between sonia and katrinas (reel and real) persona…
    still havent seen the movie but am happy to see the apparent growth in arjun rampal. as pointed out by someone, he seems hungry for another award. Find him really good-looking ( in a normal sort of way) and was the really good in houseful …
    saw a few songs on tv and was surprised to see wayne sharpes name for music. know adesh srivastav has given one song; but why was a firang needed for the music score of this v desi film–surprising to say, wayne sharp seems to have done a v good job (from the little i have seen in the promos)….

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.