A much Wanted masala detour


From the perspective of a masala ‘nostalgist’ like myself the success of Wanted was a welcome surprise following Ghajini within a year of the latter’s release and historic business. It was even more gratifying to see the single screens become the dominant part of the narrative relating to the film’s box office performance. Having been tortured for years by Yashraj inanity (this is not merely an ideological objection but one premised on the idea that this cinema was essentially bankrupt at its core by many measures of film-making) and finally having seen this model turn a corner in the current decade was tonic for the soul! At the same time one wished for that true masala success that would put the final nail in the coffin besides reinventing the masala universe for a new age. Ghajini finally offered respite from a masala drought in ‘Bollywood’ that had been decades in the making. Now Wanted has done a repeat even if on a scale dramatically reduced from Ghajini’s. This is but natural as history is not created every other day. But significant as both moments are it is crucial not to misread what each film means. Any possible reclaiming of the masala model depends on this.

Aamir’s great gamble with Ghajini has consistently been underestimated. The star definitely started out with the ambition of enabling a commercial action venture that would hearken to the ‘tradition’. He therefore invested his own capital on this project which was in some ways more risky than any other he had attempted since Lagaan. This precisely because there had not been a major action hit in Hindi cinema for about two decades, the last two being Santoshi’s Ghayal and Bachchan’s Aaj Ka Arjun (both released in the same calendar year). Aamir in effect had to select a subject that he could sell to a multiplex audience long hostile to any ‘return of masala’ and quite likely to define such an attempt as regressive by definition. The actor selected a Tamil hit and remade it in Hindi with the original director because he rightly intuited that no one in the Bollywood firmament was capable of giving masala a true makeover. Ghajini could be sold as an action film but also as a thriller. The Memento angle itself proved to be a positive as it allowed the audiences to believe this was a progressive film and of course Aamir’s connection with such a venture made it ‘prestigious’. Again, the actor invested some serious capital here.

The film created box office history by putting up an initial and final gross many degrees of magnitude removed from the other blockbusters of the age. But in an odd sense the film also served as a kind of ‘memory palace’ (as I termed it in a piece at the time) for masala cinema as opposed to signifying the reinvention of the same. Aamir sold his film almost too successfully. The multiplexes did not believe this was a masala film nor did the media focus very much on this aspect of things. The narrative basically revolved around the idea of Aamir attempting a commercial entertainer and achieving an extraordinary degree of success. The brilliance of Aamir’s wager was therefore missed at both ends of the spectrum. A masala hit was ironically not recognized as the truest masala. Ghajini was more or less assimilated with a different sort of paradigm.

Enter Wanted. This was more or less masala at the low end or on the cheap. It seemed like a throwback to an earlier era which for a multiplex audience is usually an imagined one. An entirely different media narrative developed here. Salman Khan who was ideally suited for this film inasmuch as it was never a prestige deal and hence entirely consonant with Salman’s downmarket (this was not always the case) image. In other words the lowbrow Wanted found its lowbrow hero who added a great degree of authenticity to the proceedings. The media and trade celebrated this film for restoring the balance and making single screens active after a long time. The multiplexes were still not sold and the film’s performance with this group has never been more than decent or half-decent. But the most important bit of the media narrative consisted in passing the film off as the real masala deal (the contrast with Ghajini was only implied!) and the real sign of the genuine mass entertainer. This was problematic as it also meant designating ‘primitive’ masala (it is critical to point out that masala does not begin with Bachchan even if it reaches a kind of apotheosis in the titan and his work) as the only real kind and preventing the more ‘refined’ Ghajini from being defined as such. It equally meant accepting Wanted on the terms that it was a wonderful curiosity referencing time past in a more stable world of the multiplex film. Here too the film’s ‘charge’ or promise was weakened.

Masala was never only the Manmohan Desi brand of cinema though the latter completely usurped this space beyond a point. Masala was also serious drama with a mixture of the high and low. Beyond a point and mostly owing to the Bachchan phenomenon the Desai ‘comedy’ framework completely devastated the leaner (and purer) Zanjeer or Deewar kind of narrative. But even as these films have remained iconic and canonical since their initial release the multiplex audiences (the most economically power segment in today’s Bollywood system) have not considered these to be ‘truly’ masala. In their understanding it is only the Desai school in all its manifestations that legitimately warrants the term. Ghajni was hence juxtaposed with one side of this equation and Wanted with the other.

But Wanted had another massive problem. The film operated with a completely absence of historical compass points. For one the Telugu source material or the Tamil remake (perhaps more the latter) were not translated as successfully as these might have in terms of their original ethos. In other words the film was referencing a Southern masala tradition as opposed to a Bombay one and this further enforced that sense of it being a cultural artifact. A literal blast from the past. To be enjoyed, even adored but ultimately from a distance with a sense of bemusement if not downright condescension (here too Salman is along with Akshay one of only two major stars whose successes prove the audience’s bias far more than do the failures). The only way to not take Salman or Akshay seriously is by taking them seriously in their genre stuff! Wanted in any case pretended history had stopped sometime in the late 70s or early 80s and proceeded to act accordingly though as already stated this too was a bit of a ‘fake’ move since no Hindi film tradition was being referenced here as much as a Southern one. The two are not at all the same. Ironically Ghajini was all too obsessed with history while Wanted operated with an indifference to it.

This entire discussion should not lead anyone to believe that this viewer is less than thrilled with the success of Wanted. The question however is about defining an impasse in this masala history. Clearly the Southern industries have updated things and masala is not something to be apologetic about in those ‘regional’ industries. In ‘Bollywood’ though the burden of making the case always rests on the film-maker and star who would venture into a masala project. Aamir’s prestige sealed the deal for his film and it also confirmed his other narrative of always being able to spin box office gold out of any and every subject. Wanted went in a different direction and was immediately equated with ‘purer masala’, a faulty notion as I’ve just explained above. The wager remains open. Ghajini and Wanted are simply the bets made no matter how strong. The question is: what will the rest of the industry learn from these films? Carrying on as before would be extremely regrettable and yet one might be forgiven for thinking that these two films do not, for all their differences, really offer a way out. The Aamir example keeps most other stars away from his subjects as they are unlikely to have the same confidence in their own judgment tools. Wanted meanwhile celebrates masala in a rather reactionary way. If there are paths leading from these two films to a newer ‘re-imagining’ phase in ‘Bollywood’ these are at the current moment not yet clear..

40 Responses to “A much Wanted masala detour”

  1. Great piece !! Lolzz at “lowbrow Wanted found its lowbrow hero who added a great degree of authenticity to the proceedings”

    Well satyam, this is for amitabh fans to prove their SB … Try it

    http://bollybusiness.wordpress.com/2009/10/06/quiz-identify-these-movies-and-heroines-of-amitabh-starrer-2/

    Like

  2. Wanted has not been adapted properly as hindi film.Prabhudeva did a bad job as a director.

    Like

  3. Masala has become a abused word offlate..

    Like

  4. A well-written summation of the Wanted success, thanks, Satyam. I haven’t seen Wanted and don’t plan to but to my mind neither this nor Ghajini represents a true return to anything. They only offer glimmers or shards of a history that has long since passed. I agree that if these films represent a kind of passageway towards a re-imagining of that history, I’d be happy for it…

    I will say though that what I miss is precisely the Desai kind of masala which had a great comedic slant. It’s exactly why for me Hirani’s Munnabhai series remains the masala fragments from this decade I most adore along with maybe Santoshi’s Khakee.

    Like

    • The Desai masala achievement is the most permanent one within the field but beyond a point his films diluted the dramatic element and this is something that I find detracts a bit from my sense of satisfaction as a viewer. It isn’t that he doesn’t have these sequences right upto the very end but the films are essentially comedies punctuated my moments of drama rather than dramatic masala potpourri ventures with the comedy being part of the mix. In the first camp falls a film like Coolie, in the second Suhaag (my personal favorite among his works).

      But you are certainly right in pointing out the Munnabhai franchise in this context. Khakee incidentally (and in the context of this piece) was for all its excellence in so many respects another ‘dead end’ in the masala sense. This film was again on the Deewar side of the equation with its very focused narrative and so forth but it didn’t ‘reinvent’ anything and from the perspective of the present this perhaps seems less surprising than it did at the time.

      And I don’t just mean the box office when defining success. DCH was hugely influential without being very significant in box office terms (it would have been a huge multiplex success today but then would hardly have had pioneer status). But these masala films haven’t done that. BnB which was a genuine achievement in so many ways nonetheless seemed to open up a path only for Abhishek or ‘Bachchanism’ (irrespective of whether they chose to follow it or not), Munnabhai is (I agree with you here) the most successful masala manifestation (even if again without the dramatic element) in the present age. And yet even here one doesn’t quite see the history being created.

      Like

      • You’re right to an extent on the history being created by Munnabhai. This is a film that may not be age-defining and may not have created a sociological ripple to historic degrees, but it is also a film (and a series and maybe because it is a series) that has carved a very considerable niche for itself within popular history…

        Like

        • quite right.. then again it might have some connection with the smaller rooted films that abound these days, many in a comedic vein.

          Like

        • and in fairness I bring up the history question only because I have been trying to look at the whole masala issue from the perspective of ‘re-vitalizing’ the format for a contemporary Hindi audience. So it’s not a knock on Munnabhai to suggest that it might not have created a history. Most fine films or even iconic ones in an industry are not ultimately heralds of paradigm change.

          Like

      • Agree on Desai, Suhag is my fav. too among all Desai movies, and it ran for 35 weeks in my town at the time of its release(incidentally that was first screening of new cinema opened). No doubt Munnabhai and Khakee were perfect masala entertainers with right dose.

        I will prefer Bluffmaster rather B&B. B&B looked trying hard, Bluffmaster was New age masala based on old formula. However i liked the MetaMovie kinda deal in both.

        Like

        • BM seems the greater achievement even if in a minor key. I’ll agree there. Certainly this is a rather deceptive film in many ways and one whose virtues are revealed more with each viewing which is not really true for BnB.

          Like

        • Abhishek though (and this is often missed) has been despite his patchy box office record in some ways (which too gets overstated at times or rather the greater sense of expectation confirms the fact that for better or worse he can never be seen as just another star and functions with ‘elite’ baggage) has had proportionately far more films with shelf life (whether understood in terms of buzz or cult appeal or iconic) than I think any of his contemporaries. Even widening the list and always excluding his father Aamir’s the only actor who can be termed ahead on this score. But you have Yuva, Guru, BnB, Sarkar, BM, Dostana for sure. Even Dhoom for that sort of franchise (and despite the D2 asymmetry) is a more remembered film than many others. This factor is what covers up the box office gap for him. Again even in a nothing film like Dus his dus bahane song is easily one of the iconic ones around and along with BM’s rap number he’s made these moments more lasting than Hrithik’s KNPH numbers. The latter were once so huge but seem dimmed in comparison today. Abhishek meanwhile seems to get a lot more out of his fun dance moments even today as desi girl proves. Part of the reason is that he does this sort of thing sparingly which of course affects him in box office terms but at the same time marks out those instances more.

          Similarly with his upcoming films and even as we criticize him for doing so much risky stuff the legacy issue must not be forgotten. He again has more films that are more likely to get better reviews with time than all of his peers (Aamir gets them anyway). A good example would be D6. These are films that could be re-invented in a different age. Specially with a star’s greater box office standing. And this is critical in an age where the ‘prestige’ argument counts.

          On the extreme opposite end you have stars like Akshay Kumar and Salman Khan who irrespective of their standing don’t have this element because they’ve rarely done a sensible film. When the age of such a star passes future generations always have a problem understanding why the star was that big in the first place. Shahrukh is an even better example in this sense. Even though he has been hugely iconic for so much of his career and so much a part of Bollywood’s cultural history in its multiplex/diaspora manifestation that entire brand of cinema just a decade or less later seems extremely passe. KKHH seems ‘ancient’ while JJWS has enjoyed a revival. So history takes interesting turns but only when the star in question is associated with something truly worthwhile in the first place.

          Like

    • Not to mention that both Ghajini and Wanted are Southern “transplants” — nothing illegitimate about that, my point is the fact that “transplants” are needed shows the field is so barren that stock needs to be “brought in”, not just in terms of films/projects but directors too!

      Like

  5. “On the extreme opposite end you have stars like Akshay Kumar and Salman Khan who irrespective of their standing don’t have this element because they’ve rarely done a sensible film”

    Good comment. maybe stars like Akshay and Salman have never been offered such plum roles and/or pretigious projects.

    Like

  6. Wanted could have been better if it is properly adapted.It is not Bombay masala.A properly adapted wanted could have done miracles.

    Like

  7. Nice read…I liked both Ghajini and Wanted. Just a good distraction from what is usually served up. But “like” in the sense of entertainment – they’ll never make a “bests” list.

    Munnabhai is the best example in this era – its not only a great series but it hits the right notes for all demographics. Its can cater to masses and multiplexes. Its got the strong drama and comedy and the emotional touches as well. Khakee was maybe too hard hitting to have this all round appeal whereas Ghajini had a big gimmick and a major star who is striking gold with anything. OSO was more a spoof – not masala. It was mimmicking masala – does not mean it was masala.

    But Hirani ‘s probably struck the right blend of commercialism and cleverness to get it right. And more than anything, great masala has to have great characters and memorable ones at that and Munnabhai and Circuit offer that in bucket loads.

    Like

  8. On a unrelated note, several hiring/firings going on in Hollywood. The twin heads of Universal Studios were canned yesterday after a dismal performance at the box office this year (Funny People, Bruno, Public Enemies, Land of the Lost all faring poorly). This follows the removal of Dick Cook at Disney who had been with the studios for 34 years. Hollywood can be very unforgiving even giving that its a very cyclical business.

    Like

  9. Wanted, even if entertaining sounds like a rather lazy adaption. Ghajini was done with a lot more thought. But then, thats the difference between Salman and Aamir.
    Bollywood has often looked to the South for inspiration and am glad that it has for ‘Southern’ cinema ( I know it is blasphemy to refer to it as if it is a single entity) as it seems to have plenty to offer. Again, like Satyam the other day, I wish this comment gets buried without GF getting the wind of it.
    Interesting thoughts,Satyam and largely agree.

    Like

  10. I’m surprised as to why this film is being praised so much . This is a dated and beaten to death subject.

    Like

  11. Ok for novelty value it’s welcome blast from the past but that does not mean masala is back .

    Like

  12. “”Yes I know.. OSO particularly abused it.””

    Satyam,

    When i said “”Masala”” is a abused word i meant that every Tom dick harry is jumping to this bandwagon and explaining what masala is all about…Ghajni and Wanted seem to excited a lot of people…I didnt meant ghajni and Wanted have abused masala…It seems you have a habit of misinterpreting things to suit your own advantage…

    and the way you responded it showed you immaturity to the subject again….

    Now i know this comment will be deleted because i do understand you insecurity…

    Like

  13. “”SRK is so diametrically opposed to the masala world in all his iconic films it was certainly odd to see him suddenly jump on the bandwagon!””

    Satyam,

    At one end you say OSO is not a masala film and at the other end you say he has suddenly jumped the masala bandwagon…Are you not contradicting yourself…?

    Like

  14. “””not really.. the attempt was there to jump onto the bandwagon but the final result was a fake one..””

    and this is decided by you..right??? LOL..

    Like

  15. I saw Wanted last night. I’d seen Pokiri a few years back and remember vaguely thinking it was a fun little action film.

    Wanted is more of the same really although Salman Khan’s meatheaded charm, needless to say, didn’t work nearly as well as Mahesh Babu’s ruffian.

    On revisiting the above piece I have to say I’d agree that compared to the film making merits of something like Yashraj this is preferable. But that’s not saying much and it’s also not the bar that I hope mainstream cinema is setting itself up to. Wanted isn’t a complete train wreck but it’s certainly not the kind of film I’d patronize for any reason outside of the fact that they don’t make enough films of its kind, or of its genre.

    A note on Prakashraj. He is characteristically fantastic here though he could probably, literally, play this character in his sleep by now. It’s really funny seeing him bemused by the incredulous world around him and in his climactic bout with Salman, I secretly hoped that he’d win.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.