Thoughts on barfi

Just like satyajit ray’s classic kapurush the picturesque location of Darjeeling becomes the backdrop of story of barfi with its vintage location and here again backdrop of story start with protagonist who is married and the dilemma which she faces after her marriage and ironically the guy who played the husband in kapurush( haradhan bandhopadhyay and was part of many of ray’s movie ) played jhilmil’s mentor in muskaan  and come back with a wothwile role after a long time.

The hide and seek game and the nautghty antics of barfi tries to imitate and portray the body language of Charlie Chaplin which is evident in the huge cutout of Chaplin in one of the scenes of the movie whose antics is lovable and has been the inspiration of generations starting from raj kapoor to mr bean in recent times and ironically the same portrait scene was used in cinema for the first time during that peirod only(during raj kappor’s era)
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wI4jJq98tU&list=PLD7FA150B5BA19009)
Film run on documentary style of narration describing the central character and ironically the name barfi( which took inspiration from classic Murphy radio of old time) is mute unlike its source.
Unlike bhansali’s version of handicapped who derive there strength from there defect(black khamoshi and even guzaarish)here the backdrop of story concentrates mostly on sympathy factor and unlike the landmark movie of indian cinema on same theme gulzar’s koshish  which focus entirely on handicapped struggle and motivation of winning over it or for that matter a vintage love story of pushpak anurag basu try to hollywoodize with mixture of thriller, romance and at time comic angle with strong background music which takes the narration forward infact the only cause for handicappedness comes from a normal girl who abandons her husband and for a morally right thing devotes her life teaching sign language but she is equally selfish when she finds jhilmil is gone and she is the sole oener of barfi or when she marries other guy for a secure life
Movie works mostly on emotional connect which at times are forced but anurag basu never concentrated on post martial life (except in form of climax) and lack of children unlike koshish where two handicapped person in reel life faced the real struggle and make their children normal which was normalcy for them which gives the message handicapped people need separate and different company and the inherent layers are certainly missing in both the female characters which is unable to describe there sudden transformation at times
Anurag basu should be lauded for innovativeness where he used many popular sequences of both Indian cinema as well as western cinema on same subject to form some real beautiful moments which is the strength of the movie to get some emotional tear jerkers which at best could be called inspiration and cleverly used mostly from the old classics.

Darjeeling’s portrayl in bollywood in form of toy trains continues and ranbir’s haunding of people on train through wheel was certainly innovative ( especially the modified version of kamal hasan’s sadma  climaxwhen illeana is leaving Darjeeling and barfi hounds her) and so do the music (pritam is a big surprise) and also the chase sequence of the movie between barfi and inspector which pays homage to another master mani ratnam and his famous chase sequence in thiruda thiruda(acknowledged in credits)

Picturesque location and the meaty role given to sub characters (who all very much competent and proven performers) much like the kahaani in recent time is praiseworthy but it surely lacks  the script of kahaani which was much linear and to the point a case which is further evident with just to many songs randomly taking the story forward much like basu’s life in metro where focus was mostly on hard rock to show chaos and here it shifts entirely to melody and silk sootiness and at times simple lyrics exhibiting 70’s.

Use of background music as haunting score to elevates the movie pays homage to martin scorsese style of filmmaking but at times it makes the movie loud . Unlike the main protagonists its saurav shukla of kallu mama ( satya fame) with his restraint act and with minimum dialogues makes the maximum impact.
Script is taut and various sequences converges nicely but it lacks linearancy and plays to the commercial angle

Ranbir kapoor at times mostly concentrate on using facial feauture and chaplin antics but when at times he is restraint and underplayed that’s where he is effective but certainly having a chocolate look and being decent dancer helps . Priyanka has almost negligible dialogues and concentrates mostly on body language and at time she got the nuisance of charcter but at times she annoys and illeana does her job of looking great and being restraint at perfection.
Its certainly a film which can be watched easily with family (having almost clean content ) and is watchable but it could have been much better and could have been a benchmark with elevated status

36 Responses to “Thoughts on barfi”

  1. Good stuff Rockstar. Enjoyed reading this. Also liked ur observation regarding Darjeeling and trains and also when u talk abt Muskaan’s selfish. Think u should do more pieces like these

    Like

  2. nice review rockstar

    Like

  3. “and illeana does her job of looking great and being restraint at perfection.”

    thats it? i thought she is the best thing in this film – even a notch ahead of RK.

    Like

  4. Great to read Barfi review.
    Thanks

    Like

  5. I was quite disappointed with Barfi. At the level of the script, the two halves — Ranbir/Ileana & Ranbir/Priyanka, never quite gelled, and the film seemed quite pointless to me (this isn’t a problem where Gangster is concerned, but Barfi is clearly trying to be more). One never feels the sense of the great romance/opportunity missed, such that Ileana’s dialogs/voice-overs to that effect seem forced.

    Stated differently, it’s true that the film has a point, but it seems to be a rather condescending one: the deaf-mute character (even he!) doesn’t hesitate to grasp at life, so why should you? This notion, of the “handicapped” character who serves as a vehicle to edify the “rest of us”, is deeply offensive on so many levels (although, I will concede, not in ways unique to Barfi), and I’m simply tired of it. I also completely agree with Rockstar on Darjeeling’s depiction: in fact, the meekness of films like this is underscored by these sorts of ravishing locales — “hey you might not like the film, but it’s easy on the eyes!” — and Barfi verges on timidity, with Ranbir making it clear that he’s going to channel his grandfather in similar ways whether the character is a deaf-mute; a middle-class boy as in Rockstar, or whatever (if the boy isn’t careful, he’ll end up like Hrithik, who feels every character outside of a five block-radius is varying degrees of simpleton).

    Like

    • in fact, priyanka’s character look unnecessary to me – instead at the script level, they could have shown intense romance betn. RK and Ileana and then the rejection by Ileana and in the end the reunion (i.e. when she buys the second ticket and at the last moment boards the train -that shd have been the end of the movie). Here it looks quite idealistic when RK and PC are shown married (what they do for the entire life is not shown to us) – in the other case if RK/IDC were shown together – we cud still imagine that ok IDC worked in a school and took care of RK’s materialistic needs also…

      Like

    • I’ll have to check it out but I was afraid of these kinds of problems overtaking the film…honestly I can’t think of very many Indian films that have a handicapped character at the center and don’t in some way use that character as a heavy handed vessel to communicate all sorts of banal ideas about how to live life. Black, no matter how much I may admire it for other reasons, isn’t immune to this criticism either.

      Like

    • Q – I think you saw a different movie or probably went to see with expectation to see Ray. IMO Within commercial format, this was a perfect example how can you make your product good. But then our tastes differ.
      Sometime back I saw “In the mood of love” and thought what people are clamoring about ? It has a decent story and good sound track.

      Like

      • I like In the Mood for Love but I’m a much greater fan of the sequel, 2046. And yeah both films have great soundtracks.

        Like

      • I didn’t go expecting Ray, but I did expect an entertaining and enjoyable film that was more meaningful than the usual mainstream movie: but leaving every other thing aside, I found Barfi slow and overly-long, and hence boring. At 2.5 hours, this should have been shorter (it’s funny: Dabangg was under 2 hours and felt rushed; that film should have been longer, and Barfi, by contrast, is the kind of film that would have done its breezy promos and vibe more justice had it been more brief). Second, I found it pointless — is it a grand romance? If so, I found the characterization of Ileana’s character and her relationship with Barfi quite unconvincing (early on in the film, she says that whenever she came into Barfi’s life, she did so as a “museebat” — but the rest of the film seems to bear the opposite out). The only point I could discern was that Ileana has missed her chance because she was afraid to grasp life, and played it safe — which is fair, except that message is a bit muddled by the Ranbir/Priyanka angle (the fact that Priyanka, the opposite of Ileana, is severely autistic, doesn’t necessarily send the right message on this front — because the audience could easily slot her in the “she doesn’t know any better” category). All in all, I agree the film would have been better, either without the Priyanka story, or the Ileana story…

        Like

      • I saw this movie after all this while and completely agree with Qalander. After all the praise I had heard, and my own liking for Basu’s films, I was really expecting something special here. It didn’t work for me at all. Really, what is the point of the film? I was not moved, and I am someone who cries easily. English Vinglish made my eyes moist a couple of times. This was way too superficial and a choreographed film for me. The two romances are forced. Sorry, this was Basu’s least engaging film for me, maybe Kites excluded.

        Like

        • A word on English Vinglish that I again saw only now. Absolutely fantastic. Extremely nuanced, entertaining film. I remember Rangan’s review who had some issues with the film. I had none. I thought it was a film that was near perfect.

          Like

        • The only problem with EV was Sridevi. If Vidya or Madhuri had done that role, the film would have become more watchable.

          Like

        • I would say I agree 100% except I don’t think Basu ever merited great expectations!

          Barfi is the Bollywood equivalent of Oscar bait.

          Like

        • yes, come to think of it, there is only Gangster and Metro. Certainly neither is a masterpiece, but both had terrific moments and were written from the heart. My problem with Barfi was that it seemed so artificial.

          Like

        • Barfi is a one time watch. And it was awesome if one watched it for the first time. It made one laugh and cry with the characters. Priyanka was simply unbeatable in that role. Ranbir and Ileana gave memorable performances.

          Like

        • Barfi was a magical movie. Especially from bollywood.

          Like

        • ideaunique Says:

          sandy! how can u say that abt a movie which stars ileana????? how? why? how? no – never /)(*_)*_)*U)(U

          ha ha – Madhubala / Tabdi and now Ileana – my 3 all time fav actress sandy – ek bhi labz inke khilaaf agar nikala to……..Surya ki dhulai kar doonga 😉

          Like

        • Ileana reminds me of Suchitra Sen, the enigmatic beauty.

          Like

        • Agree with sandy/ sandhya that barfi was grossly over rated. Actually I has a brief nap towards the middle of the viewing.
          Barfi was helped by good music, cinematography & media overzealousness to anoint ranbir as the next biggest star.
          Also agree with unique raju that ileana was the best thing bout barfi– 🙂 Any updates /fb etc on ileana?

          Like

        • great to see you here after a while Sandy.. hope all’s well..

          Like

    • Re: it’s true that the film has a point, but it seems to be a rather condescending one: the deaf-mute character (even he!) doesn’t hesitate to grasp at life, so why should you? This notion, of the “handicapped” character who serves as a vehicle to edify the “rest of us”

      I am surprised at your reading of the film,Q.
      Why do you feel Barfi grasps at life – Is it because he is shown to have similar aspirations as a non-handicapped ( political correctness be damned) would have? Whne goes looking for love in life and falls in love, is one grasping at life ?
      Does a deaf-mute person have to conform to a stereo-type where he is always anguished and frustrtaed at his disability?
      Barfi is essentially a a love story. The central character happends to be deaf-mute. I did not for a moment get a sense that there was any condescension. As far as Ranbir chanelling his grandfather, there is some of it but nowhere near what you imply.IMHO.There was more of it in earlier half of Rock Star.
      The rest of Rockstar was as different from his grandfather as humanly possible. Am somewhat biased being a rAnbir fan, but even at this stage of his career,Ranbir is twice the actor that his grandfather was at his best. As is his dad. And ,this comes from a Raj Kapoor fan.

      Like

      • It is not being condescending when the handicapped is not portrayed as an angst-ridden, complex plagued person. I simply cannot see where this criticism stems from. I am sure Q being Q has a valid reason for feeling this way but I cannot figure it out for the life of me.

        Like

      • You make a fair case but I’d argue that at this point the whole angle of a handicapped person loving life despite the hardships of their handicap is something of a cinematic stereotype as well. Perhaps not specifically in Indian cinema but there are a lot of life-affirming tearjerkers out there that sell this worldview. And I’m not saying that’s some great wrongdoing but beyond a point it becomes cliched as a storytelling device and can run the risk of dismissing the truth of how difficult things can be for people who do suffer. I haven’t seen Barfi, though, so I can’t speak too deeply with respect to what you and Q are discussing. I’ll kindly shove off now and let you two discuss!

        Like

        • Re: the whole angle of a handicapped person loving life despite the hardships of their handicap is something of a cinematic stereotype as well.

          Very fair point. And, Barfi is ‘guilty’ of it as well. It is just that atleast for a Hindi film, the way it is done is a fresh change. And, IMO the cause of the film has been greatly helped out b by exquisite performances by Ranbir and Priyanka. Barfi’s character doesnt evoke pity. But, I dont think that should be a problem at all. And, yes he doesnt live in some squalid quarters or a chawl as one is accustomed to seeing in films about handicapped people. The story is set in the scenic Darjeeling and I dont see it as a crime. If some of the darkness of the storyline or the misfortune of the central character is offset by beuatiful visuals, that is a trope and a liberty that a sincere film maker is allowed. Dont punish Barfi for not being all doom and gloom.

          Like

        • My problems with the film are somewhat different and more mundane. Obviously, some sequences have been lifted. Probably, blatantly so. And, the flash backs are a little ‘jerky’.And, the obvious injustice to Ileana’s character. It is far from perfect. But, charmingly so.
          Much as I liked Koshish and to a large extent, Sparsh – GIVE ME A BARFI ANYDAY OF THE WEEK .AND TWICE ON SUNDAY.

          Like

        • And, I would have put down my obvious liking for the film to being a Ranbir fan. Except that BR’s review gives me some solace and justification!

          Like

        • I actually can’t think of a Hindi film that places a handicapped character in a “grittier” setting. I think Bala’s Naan Kadavul is in many ways a rather thoughtful movie about the handicapped and of course that film is a very dark movie but then I think it also splits the difference in a rather interesting way. Meaning it’s a film that has some rather grim scenes that can be seen as manipulative and perhaps even cliched but there is also a “reason” why the director has chosen to make a film with the handicapped and it’s not because he’s imparting the usual, tired, message that life is beautiful no matter what. Part of the reason I don’t like when directors do what Basu has presumably done here is that he’s not really telling us anything very new. Which makes the use of handicapped characters seem all the more manipulative. Again can’t say this with any kind of certainty as I haven’t seen the film but hopefully I’m making some sense.

          Like

  6. Finally—
    Rajen uncle comes out of his ‘panty-business’ (those who are not new know what’s being talked about!) and speaks some sense!!
    Some good points there–
    As always –I don’t care / ‘discriminate’ where the good posts come from!
    & speak what I truly have to!!
    The question is–
    For how long can he stay away from his ‘inner urges’…. 🙂

    Like

  7. Though can see qalanders points asks somewhat
    ESP about the lack of ‘gelling’
    And the ‘meekness of this enterprise’
    Ps: I actually didn’t love this film as much as some here have ..

    Like

  8. Kamal Hasan’s Pushpak was a silent film with no handicapped people around. And it was so much fun watching all the actors going into silent mode.

    Ranbir never had that bechara look his grandfather was so famous for. Rishi Kapoor successfully shook off Raj Kapoor’s hangover.

    Barfi has repeat value due to so many factors and one of them is the confusing flashbacks. To unravel, one has to watch it again.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.