An Jo on BLACK WIDOW

Watched BLACK WIDOW in the cinema hall in XD box version. What hell of a difference the viewing experience it makes! With each and every bullet ricocheting and creating goosebumps up your arse, it was a thrilling ride. The last time I watched a movie in theater was in December 2020 and that too only for Nolan, for TENET. The superbly shot Bombay sky-scraper sequence, the initial opera attack, and the reverse entropy scene, those were the highlights for me in terms of cinematic experience.

The story is truly ordinary – frankly, which super-hero/mythical movie ever had an extra-ordinary story except ‘Mahabharata’ and then, ‘Ramayana’ in that order? But Scarlett fills up the screen with her glowing radiance. And make no mistake, she hides no effort to show that she is one of the hottest women on this earth; whether as Natasha Romanoff she’s just washing her face in the women’s restroom or she’s showing her scarred upper and lower-back. She pouts, she flaunts her dimples, but sends the adrenaline soaring high and she also has the intelligence to bring it down with her serious notes. [Watch her dramatize when she ‘severs the nerve.’] The camera deliberately focuses on her body but in a non-RGV-esqe vulgar manner. [And then I realize she’s executive-produced the film!] But, but, it is Florence Pugh as Yelena Belova that dazzles with her take: In a way, she’s Dharam’s Veeru to Amitabh’s Jai in ‘Sholay.’ She is great in action scenes – she’s so cool with a plan but no plan when she just force-reverses the wheel, opens her side of the door and knocks out the motorcyclist chasing them – but more so, fantastically comical: I would love to see her in a totally zany avatar one day! Her mocking of Natasha’s ‘style’ of landing on the ground and spreading her right leg and looking up is so hilarious, it almost threw me out of my seat laughing my lungs out! What timing! Ray Winstone as Dreykov plays a stereo-typical Russian General. Rachel Weisz as ‘Melina’ has either gotten old or made to look old. She does her job ‘professionally’ to put it mildly. David Harbor is hilarious as the faux-father to the ‘girls’ and it is superb seeing Yelena put him to brain-rest as she talks of women’s reproductive system. The one who does get a raw deal is Olga Kurylenko – of the infamous ‘Quantum of Solace’ Bond movie – as Dreykov’s daughter Antonia who suffers a collateral damage that Natasha never intended.

The film globe-trots across Morocco, Hungary, Norway, and the ‘Red Room.’ But what surprised me in the crediting of other locations when the end-credits roll were mentions like Australia and New Zealand. The action scene in Budapest is superbly shot and so is the scene in Norway. The initial confrontational/action scene between Natasha Romanoff and Antonia Dreykov on a bridge in Norway is superbly conceived and shot: And so is scene between Natasha and a bunch of ‘Black Widows’ where she single-handedly takes them on a la Tarantino’s ‘KILL BILL’ scene starring Lucy Liu’s O-Ren Ishii and her acolytes; though of-course, the scene here not as cartoonish or as violent as the one in ‘KILL BILL.’

This is not a very great movie. However, it is highly entertaining albeit with a bloated middle. But the ‘girls’, keep the movie thoroughly interested and the credit for that should evenly go to the director Cate Shortland and the screenplay by Eric Pearson.

The trio of Cate, Scarlett, and Florence kick patriarchy in super-hero movies/universe somewhere between a place called subtlety and in-your-face, if there ever was a place like that.

7 Responses to “An Jo on BLACK WIDOW”

  1. Shivaay Says:

    @An Jo- Mythological movies have ordinary stories, so you do accept Bahubali’s plotline has nothing to write home about. I’d like to hear from you on the heavily over rated (and disinteresting in my opinion) Game of Thrones as well.

    Like

    • @Shivaay: I truly agree super-hero movies have some-to-none plot-lines. There is hardly any greater sum; but there are fantastic moments which run toward that goal-post — and so are sports-based movies — of ethics and morality.

      I have not watched a single episode of GOT: Only because I am very faint-hearted and cannot withstand gory violence. I know it could be a gripping series — even with one of the leads holding a Starbucks cup in the middle-ages — but extreme violence is not for me. So I cannot comment on that.

      BAHUBALI 1 was astoundingly entertaining for me, merely because Rajamouli somehow was able to capture the magic of ‘Chandamama’ comics for me on-screen: A totally rooted, Indian film for me without caring a hoots for what Hollywood had done in this particular genre, be it Wolf-gang Peterson’s ‘Troy’ or Kirk Douglas’s ‘Spartacus.’ Part 2, was not even 20 percent of what part 1 was, Raja went over-board with the action sequences and VFX that one could laugh about it openly.

      The reason I singled out ‘Mahabharata’ is because of the spokes Krishna yanks out of the wheel of ‘morality.’ There are many instances where he guides us and then makes us question his wisdom a 1000 times; ‘Kill Karna NOW, when he is busy lifting his chariot-wheel’, and then, when Krishna gets out of the chariot, the entire chariot that supported Arjuna collapses and Krishna says that it was the charioteer, he, who was responsible for Arjuna slaying Karna. If not him, who? If not Krishna, then weren’t Arjuna’s questions right to begin with in the 18 day war? Krishna places a huge burden on us to understand these type of conundrums. That’s why I said, except for the MAHABHARATA, I have hardly seen any mythical/super-heroes with complex questions and swirling consciences…

      Like

      • Shivaay Says:

        “Part 2, was not even 20 percent of what part 1 was, Raja went over-board with the action sequences and VFX that one could laugh about it openly.” – totally agreed. Couldn’t have put it better. Bahubali 2 was a shambolic mess with visuals that were nothing more than a laugh riot (flying ships, bulls with horns on fire, palm trees as catapults took the angry bird droppings though!) but if you look at Rajamouli’s filmography, part 2 is more of his zone while part 1 comes off as more of a one off fluke (Magadheera was a laughable disaster, Vikramarkudu is a disgusting film and Eega is nothing special despite all the awe and aura about it).

        Like

      • I didn’t touch GOT till 5th season because I have certain aversion to Fantasy genre. And it does have it share of violence and nudity. But in terms of story expanse and grandness, I think only Mahabharat comes near (if at all someone makes it). They did very good justice till last season (or till they have book material ) according most. I didn’t find last season problematic but may be rushed, it could have been 3-4 more episodes to make things more progressive in terms of time. Also till book everything was well connected and but when the executive producers wrote last 2-3 seasons, it went away from book in terms of homages, prophecies described in earlier episodes.

        As a voracious TV series consumer, I consider following top notch:
        1. Breaking bad – wafer thin plot but screen play and acting are top notch.
        2. GoT – I can talk endlessly 🙂
        3. The Wire – gritty and very real.
        4. Line of duty – very well done police procedural drama.
        5. There are some K dramas – Season one of Stranger, Signal

        The Bureau (French) is very good but at times very dry.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Shivaay Says:

          Sherlock season 1 & 2 were outstanding adaptations till it went downhill from season 3 due to uneven writing & character arcs. True Detective season 1 is a masterpiece, Luther is good as well. As a movie fan i’d rather take limited anthology series than long endless one’s that last for years.

          Like

  2. Nice review, An Jo.

    I can only talk about the specifics once I watch the movie. But good to see you back to writing reviews once again.

    Like

    • Thanks Saket. I recommend to you, and all, if theaters are open in your areas, watch it for the experience. You will RE-LIVE what it was like to watch grand action sequences on screen.

      THIS is what the big screen is built for.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.